• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login
FAForever Forums
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login

Talking about the Fatty

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
94 Posts 35 Posters 12.1k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P
    Pearl12
    last edited by 18 Sept 2022, 22:33

    Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

    I just don't think "it's balanced if you micro it" is the argument we should be leaning on. Isn't that just a skill filter?

    S 1 Reply Last reply 19 Sept 2022, 16:45 Reply Quote 0
    • F
      FtXCommando
      last edited by 18 Sept 2022, 23:55

      For sera t3 land to be decent you need to babysit it so this is a weird argument since the UEF guy doesnt need to babysit his sniper blob

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        Nooby @Tex
        last edited by 19 Sept 2022, 14:05

        @tex said in Talking about the Fatty:

        Vanilla fatty was a monster. It packed those big boy summit cannons. Shell damage and speed was massive. Dps was way higher even with like, 1/4th the ROF. I miss vanilla fatty. It would still suffer from the same problems but it was way cooler.

        Why not half its ROF and double its shell damage?

        I think this would suit the faction more

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          veteranashe
          last edited by 19 Sept 2022, 14:19

          I just watched a cast of Rambo coms dodging around half the fatty shells so that might be a bad idea.

          T 1 Reply Last reply 19 Sept 2022, 15:11 Reply Quote 1
          • T
            TheVVheelboy @veteranashe
            last edited by 19 Sept 2022, 15:11

            @veteranashe
            It can be also accompanied by buff to the shell velocity. Tripple the damage, lower the rof, at the very least double the shell velocity and you have a beast of a unit. Switch the explosions to the summit one and you have a unit that now also have a good sound/visual punch to it.

            And if going this route one could also experiment with changing the firing randomness to make it more of a precision artillery piece rather than current one that is more about shelling your opponent with thousand small shells.

            Also another thing I would look at is small buffs to the riot guns. Giving them a little bit bigger turret Yaw could make them much more reliable to use.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Sladow-Noob @Pearl12
              last edited by 19 Sept 2022, 16:45

              @pearl12 said in Talking about the Fatty:

              Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

              There is a chance I simply misunderstood it, but your opponent indeed has to micro as well. He walks chicken into your fatty and you retreat - His chicken will die.
              He also has to pay attention and react to your movements, otherwise his units just get hit for free -> I would actually say your opponent (If you're the one with the fatty) has to use more apm due to finding mistakes in your micro so he can push and once he was in range and needs to get out, he has to run in zig-zag as well

              Inactive.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:14
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:21
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:29
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:32
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:34
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:37
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:40
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 17:41
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 18:00
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 18:02
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 18:10
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 18:12
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 18:32
              • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 19 Sept 2022, 19:30
              • C
                ComradeStryker
                last edited by ComradeStryker 20 Sept 2022, 18:01

                I have to agree with your post.

                The Fatboy is a great unit, perfect in the right conditions, but those conditions need to be near-perfect for it to be effective, otherwise, it will die quite quickly...
                As for other Exps, they are much more forgiving and have a wider 'effectiveness' range, if that makes sense.


                ~ Stryker

                ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • C
                  CaptainKlutz
                  last edited by 20 Sept 2022, 18:08

                  93a3f768-4a54-49c8-a3e3-5b43ff469436-image.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
                  • T
                    TheWeakie
                    last edited by 20 Sept 2022, 18:31

                    Yes.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • Z
                      Zeldafanboy
                      last edited by 20 Sept 2022, 18:49

                      an opinion can only be correct if it fits in a single sentence

                      put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        veteranashe
                        last edited by 20 Sept 2022, 21:39

                        +1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 6 Oct 2022, 21:09
                        • C ComradeStryker referenced this topic on 10 Oct 2022, 06:17
                        • H
                          HarambeOccultist
                          last edited by 6 Jan 2023, 17:56

                          I concur with the idea of buffing the shell speed and allowing it to move while building units. Personally also like the idea of giving it a personal shield and buffing its general HP but those might be too much. Maybe ever so slightly buff its movement speed as well?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            ComradeStryker
                            last edited by 9 Jan 2023, 17:44

                            I suggested that the Shield HP and the Base Unit's HP be swapped - It would still have the same HP as it does right now, but it'll
                            work slightly differently over time.


                            ~ Stryker

                            ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V
                              veteranashe
                              last edited by 9 Jan 2023, 19:38

                              Makes me think how much more useful the czar is after dropping the HP and adding a sheild

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                Deribus Global Moderator
                                last edited by 9 Jan 2023, 19:55

                                I want fatty to be able to toss it's shield like a giant curling stone.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • F
                                  Fichom
                                  last edited by Fichom 1 Oct 2023, 03:27 10 Jan 2023, 03:19

                                  If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                  Or give it staggered fire, higher arc, larger scatter and larger damage radius - effectively, a small-scale Scathis. The better scatter + damage radius will make it harder to dodge, though you might want to nudge it's alpha then so it doesn't just wipe non-experimentals from existence.

                                  Or just turn it into a MAA experimental, and have it's main guns able to fire at air targets lol.

                                  Actually you could give it like, in addition to being able to produce T3 land, the ability to produce up to T2 air as well. If paired with I hope soon coming fix to the mobile factories working even when on move, you could churn out some bombers or gunships to help it against incoming direct-fire experimentals.

                                  B Z 2 Replies Last reply 10 Jan 2023, 10:12 Reply Quote 5
                                  • J
                                    Jip
                                    last edited by 10 Jan 2023, 08:48

                                    If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                    I love this idea 😄

                                    A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      Blodir @Fichom
                                      last edited by 10 Jan 2023, 10:12

                                      @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                                      If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                      I also love this idea B) I guess you'd maybe add a little bit of range to the units being transported or something so that it makes sense to use them to augment the fatboy. Sounds like a lot of fun to pimp ur fatboy with different setups

                                      • t3 maa and shields vs strat snipes
                                      • t3 mobile arty for even more bombardment
                                      • percies for direct fire engagements
                                      • stealth field!
                                      • spearheads? shield disruptors?
                                      • sniper bots

                                      Honestly if that was implemented I'd also like to see it become much cheaper (with reduced stats to compensate). T3 armies are kinda trash atm, so being able to load them into fatboys to become semi experimentals would make uef work better aggressively in exp stage.

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply 10 Jan 2023, 17:33 Reply Quote 0
                                      • X
                                        Xayo
                                        last edited by Xayo 1 Oct 2023, 14:37 10 Jan 2023, 11:30

                                        I agree with t3 land being "kinda trash atm" (compared to t4), and think this whole Fatboy discussion is merely a symptom of this.

                                        Things were a little better before the GC buff fix. Back then percies only had to be afraid of Chickens. Now they also need to be afraid of GCs. So against 2/4 factions, t3 land will just brutally lose against t4. Cybran can at least somewhat compete with their monkey/mega, but the fatty just can't.

                                        Changing the T3 vs T4 land dynamic to the point where percies can at least somewhat hold the line might be better than changing the fatty.

                                        F W 2 Replies Last reply 10 Jan 2023, 15:01 Reply Quote 1
                                        • F
                                          Fichom @Xayo
                                          last edited by 10 Jan 2023, 15:01

                                          @xayo said in Talking about the Fatty:

                                          Things were a little better before the GC buff fix. Back then percies only had to be afraid of Chickens. Now they also need to be afraid of GCs. So against 2/4 factions, t3 land will just brutally lose against t4. Cybran can at least somewhat compete with their monkey/mega, but the fatty just can't.

                                          Well to make the GC not as overwhelming vs T3, you could mark some units to be 'heavy' a.k.a. not-tractorable. Say to all 'heavy' T3 land units of each faction - Percy, Brick, Othuum and Harbs.

                                          But that's for another thread, this one should focus on the Fatboy

                                          @blodir said in Talking about the Fatty:

                                          I also love this idea B) I guess you'd maybe add a little bit of range to the units being transported or something so that it makes sense to use them to augment the fatboy.

                                          I'd actually not augment the carried units (if this ever came to fruition). Just leave them as is. You already pointed one pretty busted thing, it having stealth, but don't forget that in multi-team games you could have it quite busted. Using Sera Athanah T3 mobile shield instead of para, a Sparky to get jamming/Deceiver for stealth, bunch of firepower. Like adding 10 Percies would already make it very strong. Or a combo of Percies and Titans, to help with clearing spam.

                                          What's more, I'd give it like 2 slots in the front, and 3 on each side. That way you don't get the benefits of all the units at once, unless they are support units (like shield or AA).

                                          F 1 Reply Last reply 10 Jan 2023, 23:51 Reply Quote 0
                                          72 out of 94
                                          • First post
                                            72/94
                                            Last post