FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Talking about the Fatty

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    94 Posts 35 Posters 12.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • veteranasheV
      veteranashe
      last edited by

      Lol a exp without support is typically a dead exp

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • phongP
        phong @Pearl12
        last edited by phong

        @Pearl12 Comparing it to the monkeylord is a bit unfair since that's the ultimate rush experimental and it only manages those memorable base wipes when it's brought to bear early enough to encounter little resistance. But the balance team was afforded a luxury when making it so: cybran have 2 land experimentals so they could specialize one of them for early-late-game. Fatties, on the other hand, we should instead compare to chickens, GCs and megaliths.

        All that being said, you are still right, I think. The fatty is more dependent on supporting units than all of those, since it can't tank and its damage is so low. This, I think, was also a deliberate design choice by the balance team, justified at the time by the fact that UEF had what was perceived to be a stronger-than-average t3 land unit mix, some even said the strongest, before snipers became so popular.

        I think that by trying to make it's extreme range the defining characteristic though, the balance team sort of painted themselves into a corner. With this constraint, they had to reduce its speed, damage and health compared to other experimentals, otherwise it could just kite them too effectively. This, in turn, made it disproportionately vulnerable to air snipes and t2 artillery, as people have mentioned. To be clear, I don't think it's a bad design direction to explore, but maybe toning down it's range, projectile speed or shot spread a bit might allow some buffs to it's weaknesses, health and damage. As long as other experimentals, while dodging, can still take it down 1v1, that might be ok.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Pearl12P
          Pearl12 @Sladow-Noob
          last edited by

          @sladow-noob said in Talking about the Fatty:

          Also I wouldn't call "move shields every now and then, otherwise support the fatty" micro-intense, so I adressed that. It does take micro, yes, but only a couple of clicks every now and then, so basically... nothing compared to other units

          Yea, "a couple of clicks every now and then" for an 1800 is "basically nothing," but for those of us plebs who are still mediocre at micromanaging, "a couple of clicks" is gg.

          Sladow-NoobS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Sladow-NoobS
            Sladow-Noob @Pearl12
            last edited by

            @pearl12
            Don't forget the apm of your opponent is limited as well. If we talk about high ranks, then it's only a few clicks.
            If we talk about lower ranked lobbies, then it could be more intense, however the opponent doesn't realise all the possibilities to kill the fatty. It basically cancels out if you understand what I mean?
            Explanation might not be the best here, but speaking from experience low ranks tend to focus on 1-2 things at the time so it's not a problem.

            Inactive.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Pearl12P
              Pearl12
              last edited by

              Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

              I just don't think "it's balanced if you micro it" is the argument we should be leaning on. Isn't that just a skill filter?

              Sladow-NoobS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FtXCommandoF
                FtXCommando
                last edited by

                For sera t3 land to be decent you need to babysit it so this is a weird argument since the UEF guy doesnt need to babysit his sniper blob

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  Nooby @Tex
                  last edited by

                  @tex said in Talking about the Fatty:

                  Vanilla fatty was a monster. It packed those big boy summit cannons. Shell damage and speed was massive. Dps was way higher even with like, 1/4th the ROF. I miss vanilla fatty. It would still suffer from the same problems but it was way cooler.

                  Why not half its ROF and double its shell damage?

                  I think this would suit the faction more

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • veteranasheV
                    veteranashe
                    last edited by

                    I just watched a cast of Rambo coms dodging around half the fatty shells so that might be a bad idea.

                    TheVVheelboyT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • TheVVheelboyT
                      TheVVheelboy @veteranashe
                      last edited by

                      @veteranashe
                      It can be also accompanied by buff to the shell velocity. Tripple the damage, lower the rof, at the very least double the shell velocity and you have a beast of a unit. Switch the explosions to the summit one and you have a unit that now also have a good sound/visual punch to it.

                      And if going this route one could also experiment with changing the firing randomness to make it more of a precision artillery piece rather than current one that is more about shelling your opponent with thousand small shells.

                      Also another thing I would look at is small buffs to the riot guns. Giving them a little bit bigger turret Yaw could make them much more reliable to use.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Sladow-NoobS
                        Sladow-Noob @Pearl12
                        last edited by

                        @pearl12 said in Talking about the Fatty:

                        Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

                        There is a chance I simply misunderstood it, but your opponent indeed has to micro as well. He walks chicken into your fatty and you retreat - His chicken will die.
                        He also has to pay attention and react to your movements, otherwise his units just get hit for free -> I would actually say your opponent (If you're the one with the fatty) has to use more apm due to finding mistakes in your micro so he can push and once he was in range and needs to get out, he has to run in zig-zag as well

                        Inactive.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                        • ComradeStrykerC
                          ComradeStryker
                          last edited by ComradeStryker

                          I have to agree with your post.

                          The Fatboy is a great unit, perfect in the right conditions, but those conditions need to be near-perfect for it to be effective, otherwise, it will die quite quickly...
                          As for other Exps, they are much more forgiving and have a wider 'effectiveness' range, if that makes sense.


                          ~ Stryker

                          ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • CaptainKlutzC
                            CaptainKlutz
                            last edited by

                            93a3f768-4a54-49c8-a3e3-5b43ff469436-image.png

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
                            • TheWeakieT
                              TheWeakie
                              last edited by

                              Yes.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • ZeldafanboyZ
                                Zeldafanboy
                                last edited by

                                an opinion can only be correct if it fits in a single sentence

                                put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • veteranasheV
                                  veteranashe
                                  last edited by

                                  +1

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                                  • H
                                    HarambeOccultist
                                    last edited by

                                    I concur with the idea of buffing the shell speed and allowing it to move while building units. Personally also like the idea of giving it a personal shield and buffing its general HP but those might be too much. Maybe ever so slightly buff its movement speed as well?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ComradeStrykerC
                                      ComradeStryker
                                      last edited by

                                      I suggested that the Shield HP and the Base Unit's HP be swapped - It would still have the same HP as it does right now, but it'll
                                      work slightly differently over time.


                                      ~ Stryker

                                      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • veteranasheV
                                        veteranashe
                                        last edited by

                                        Makes me think how much more useful the czar is after dropping the HP and adding a sheild

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DeribusD
                                          Deribus Global Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          I want fatty to be able to toss it's shield like a giant curling stone.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • FichomF
                                            Fichom
                                            last edited by Fichom

                                            If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                            Or give it staggered fire, higher arc, larger scatter and larger damage radius - effectively, a small-scale Scathis. The better scatter + damage radius will make it harder to dodge, though you might want to nudge it's alpha then so it doesn't just wipe non-experimentals from existence.

                                            Or just turn it into a MAA experimental, and have it's main guns able to fire at air targets lol.

                                            Actually you could give it like, in addition to being able to produce T3 land, the ability to produce up to T2 air as well. If paired with I hope soon coming fix to the mobile factories working even when on move, you could churn out some bombers or gunships to help it against incoming direct-fire experimentals.

                                            B ZeldafanboyZ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post