• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login
FAForever Forums
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login

Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
100 Posts 41 Posters 11.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    TheWeakie
    last edited by 19 Sept 2021, 03:37

    I once had a 70k mass killed atlantis on sentons. Time to nerf them theyre clearly op

    C 1 Reply Last reply 19 Sept 2021, 19:55 Reply Quote 1
    • C
      CPTANT @TheWeakie
      last edited by 19 Sept 2021, 19:55

      @thewheelie

      A => B does not equal !B => !A. I did not claim this was proof they were OP, I said this is a weird case to showcase how they are not.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        TheWeakie
        last edited by 19 Sept 2021, 22:16

        I wasn't responding to you

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          relentless
          last edited by relentless 22 Sept 2021, 03:40

          I've always wondered why the novax doesn't consume power when its firing similar to a SMD or something when they are building missiles.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Arran
            last edited by 23 Sept 2021, 11:41

            Requiring energy to fire the Novax seems like a good way to subtly nerf it. Just like how T3 Arty consume energy to fire. Please flame me if I'm mistake as I've not fact checked.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              Deribus Global Moderator
              last edited by 23 Sept 2021, 12:41

              That'd be such a minor nerf as to be irrelevant. By the time you have a novax (or T3 arty for that matter) you have the power overflow to sustain it.

              It's like T3 PD. Did you know that costs energy to fire? Yeah, no one does because it doesn't matter.

              K 1 Reply Last reply 23 Sept 2021, 13:28 Reply Quote 1
              • K
                KaletheQuick @Deribus
                last edited by 23 Sept 2021, 13:28

                @deribus I knew.
                But yeah, it's not super relevant, unless it was made to do damage based on how much power was consumed and was uncapped. That would be hilarious.

                You must deceive the enemy, sometimes your allies, but you must always deceive yourself!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  Broker @Jip
                  last edited by 20 Oct 2021, 16:30

                  @jip said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                  I just had a game vs a player that did this and they lost:

                  • https://replay.faforever.com/15171437

                  They're annoying, but really cheap to counter. And remember: if they spent 30K mass on a Novax, and you spent 10K on some shields, it means you have a 20K advantage.

                  You can not build shields around all map.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    Nooby
                    last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 13:36

                    A single novax should be nerfed so it does not get through any factions t2 shield or cybrans t2 shield when upgraded once.

                    I also like the idea of novax needing significant energy to fire

                    Giving novax energy ajacency to get back some of its DPS is also an intresting idea - Mabie when fully surrouded by t3 pgens it has same dps as current

                    Take this setons replay: Lategame, mavor + multiple novax is really the ultimate game ender. The counter to mavor is to build power all about the map for the nuke subs and carrier strat bombers. However the novax can scout and kill these indifivual pgens really easily:

                    https://replay.faforever.com/18645999

                    F 1 Reply Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 13:43 Reply Quote 0
                    • F
                      FemtoZetta @Nooby
                      last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 13:43

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        Nooby
                        last edited by Nooby 12 Feb 2022, 14:41 2 Dec 2022, 14:21

                        The novax did far more damage that game than the mavor, and that game had multiple people much higher rated than you in it

                        Mavor alone does not win a double naval loss on setons

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          ComradeStryker
                          last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 20:59

                          The rationalization of the Novax is to barrage shields to prevent them from refreshing / recharging.
                          Another point of it is to raid enemy structures on the outskirts of maps or structures that the enemy didn't bother to shield 25 minutes into a game.

                          To counter a Novax, a player just needs to spend about 600 mass on building T2 shields. Yes, that adds up, especially multiple shields and multiple players, but... by building 10, 20, or even 30, T2 shields to protect what's decently important means you've spent 6, 12, or 18 thousand mass and they spent 36 thousand mass. Either way, you're saving mass.
                          If they build a 2nd Novax... well, they should've built an Arty instead, honestly.

                          Once the Novax is countered, it's practically useless aside from tickling away at a shield - its Omni, radar, and vision radius is pitiful, especially for a satellite that supposedly orbits the map.

                          It's an experimental... If the damage is reduced; well... they may as well move the unit into the T3 stage.

                          A Nuke is far cheaper and far more deadly because it causes the enemy team to invest in SMDs to protect their bases. SMDs are far more expensive than a T2 shield (Obviously) - hence why the nukes are being nerfed.

                          A Novax does not need a nerf in my opinion as its cost, performance, and abilities are already at a disadvantage.
                          Again, its strength of it comes from being able to raid unshielded structures - which can be countered by proper scouting when the structure is being built.


                          ~ Stryker

                          ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                          C N 2 Replies Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 21:02 Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            Cyborg16 @ComradeStryker
                            last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 21:02

                            @comradestryker said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                            its Omni, radar, and vision radius is pitiful, especially for a satellite that supposedly orbits the map

                            Surely intel should be a satellite's main strength? Why not buff this part.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply 2 Dec 2022, 21:04 Reply Quote 1
                            • C
                              ComradeStryker @Cyborg16
                              last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 21:04

                              @cyborg16 said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                              @comradestryker said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                              its Omni, radar, and vision radius is pitiful, especially for a satellite that supposedly orbits the map

                              Surely intel should be a satellite's main strength? Why not buff this part.

                              I agree, it's basically a really expensive Eye that isn't anywhere as useful.
                              But, that's up to Tagada to change.


                              ~ Stryker

                              ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • N
                                Nooby @ComradeStryker
                                last edited by Nooby 12 Feb 2022, 21:17 2 Dec 2022, 21:12

                                @comradestryker
                                First of all, its 1200 mass per point defended (UEF t2 shield) as novax kill anything under a single t2 shield. It also required buildpower being avalable at every one of these points on the map, this takes time and increases cost.

                                You should have a look at how the novax was used in that replay. No other unit in the game can replace the novax in that situation. A first novax on setons is always cost effective (The same can be said with nuke)

                                The game would not have been won without the novax. T3 arty is almost always worse, not better than novax on setons. The novax were more effective than the mavor at less cost. and had greater impact on game outcome.

                                Comparing the two once a single shield is up against a shielded base is stupid, they are for differrent things, and the novax is too good in its niche . T3 arty does not kill expanding engineers or moving cruisers. T3 arty does not snipe thigs like stealthed pgens built across the map. T3 arty does not provide omni vision and scouting. T3 arty does not have infintite range. T3 arty is more eggs in one basket making it easier to snipe. T3 arty takes longer to payoff and longer to build, making it easier to scout and counter. T3 arty cannot be split against multiple targets around the map. It is not cost effective to fire t3 arty at single mexes, but it is with novax.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • FtXCommandoF
                                  FtXCommando
                                  last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 22:33

                                  I wonder about a novax rework where it’s more of a t3 arty that rewards risky placement. Say the distance away from the station causes recharge rate to decrease but it would shoot essentially continuously right next to the station.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • TheVVheelboyT
                                    TheVVheelboy
                                    last edited by 2 Dec 2022, 22:39

                                    I feel like that would require a massive rebalance. As it could make it so you will never get anywhere close to the opponents base with 1-2 novaxes.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      ComradeStryker
                                      last edited by ComradeStryker 12 Mar 2022, 00:15 3 Dec 2022, 00:06

                                      A thought I've had to rework the Novax was something like so:

                                      • Make SMDs able to shoot at the satellites. (2 shots)
                                      • Increase the intel and vision rings of the sat.
                                      • Reduce the station cost by a significant amount. (36K -> 20K)
                                      • Reduce the satellite cost. (10K -> 5k)
                                      • One station can build multiple sats but if the station is destroyed, all sats that were constructed by that station get destroyed as well.
                                      • Increase station HP. (9k -> 15K)

                                      I don't know, I'm just throwing stuff out, here.
                                      I've thought about SMDs countering sats, before, though I wouldn't have the slightest idea on how to balance that.
                                      If that's the case, then the Sat needs to be far cheaper. 7.5K to counter 36K is probably not the way to balance that.

                                      Or a drastic change to an SMD needs to be made, too. But that would also have to keep in mind a Yolo, as well.
                                      Mixing in a Sat with a Yolo is gonna be dreadful with these changes. So, yeah... I have no idea on how to rework something like this without breaking something else.

                                      Would you make the Novax a spammable unit? Or change it to match a game-ender type of thing? That is the question.


                                      ~ Stryker

                                      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • FtXCommandoF
                                        FtXCommando
                                        last edited by 3 Dec 2022, 00:15

                                        novax causing smds to be shot is just asking for cheese nukes to win games and the other changes don’t even work to make novax more fun or unique it’s just trying to make it easier to stack a death ball of them

                                        C JipJ 2 Replies Last reply 3 Dec 2022, 00:24 Reply Quote 3
                                        • C
                                          ComradeStryker @FtXCommando
                                          last edited by ComradeStryker 12 Mar 2022, 00:36 3 Dec 2022, 00:24

                                          @ftxcommando said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                                          novax causing smds to be shot is just asking for cheese nukes to win games and the other changes don’t even work to make novax more fun or unique it’s just trying to make it easier to stack a death ball of them

                                          Yeah, you're right... That'd be just Nuke haven. Probably best to be left as is, then.
                                          But...


                                          Another thought I've had before was to grant T3 & T4 Arties the ability to target and destroy Satellites.
                                          This change would make it so there is an option to counter them but without needing to Nerf or Buff either unit absurdly.

                                          This 'mechanic' is already in-game but it can't be pulled off because the Sat is untargetable.
                                          Though you can see occasional Arty shells (Yolo Missiles too) collide with a Sat and destroy it.

                                          That'd be interesting. Though there would have to be a random chance to miss otherwise the Sat dying immediately to the first shell that is fired, well, that would be unbalanced.

                                          Again... just another idea.


                                          ~ Stryker

                                          ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • First post
                                            Last post