• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login
FAForever Forums
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login

Fix tactical artillery - Battleships/T2/T3 mobile artillery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
19 Posts 10 Posters 1.6k Views 1 Watching
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    FunkOff @Deribus
    last edited by 25 Dec 2023, 21:36

    @deribus I'm glad you asked.

    1- It would buff T3 mobile artillery, which are currently under-used. (Although I think the main issue is their extremely low HP, this HP issue can be mitigated with use of shields. Their damage is low, but their damage radius is very good which mitigates that. That basically leaves the range as the only problem.
    2- This would serve not as a nerf to battleships mainly, but as a modest hedge against their domination against bases.
    3- T2 static artillery seem relatively balanced (aside from their weakness to battleships) and so changes should focus on requiring minimum changes to them.

    Regarding #1 in particular, I've been sure to watch ALL the LoTS games on Youtube. These games surely represent the top tier of play. In my view, it's pretty clear that direct combat units of all tiers (tanks, T2 tanks, T3 bots) take precedence generally, and only in specific situations do the 'support' units such as MMLs and T3 mobile artillery warrant consideration. Hypothetically, the game could be balanced in the reverse, that mobile artillery are always better than tanks, except in rare/specific circumstances.

    I'm not asking for a paradigm shift, just a modest adjustment.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • I Offline
      IndexLibrorum Global Moderator
      last edited by 25 Dec 2023, 21:37

      Why should a T2 unit be able to hold its own against a significantly more expensive T3 unit?

      "Design is an iterative process. The required number of iterations is one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any point in time."

      See all my projects:

      F 1 Reply Last reply 25 Dec 2023, 21:39 Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        FunkOff @IndexLibrorum
        last edited by 25 Dec 2023, 21:39

        @indexlibrorum I agree with you that a T2 unit shouldnt hold its own against a T3 units without a large resource/numerical advantage. This is, in fact, why I propose that T3 mobile artillery should have an improved range to help them combat T2 artillery. Regarding t2 artillery against battleships, under my proposal, battleships will still win, at least until T3 shields are used to help aid the defense of the t2 static artillery.

        I 1 Reply Last reply 25 Dec 2023, 21:49 Reply Quote 0
        • I Offline
          IndexLibrorum Global Moderator @FunkOff
          last edited by 25 Dec 2023, 21:49

          @funkoff then, do you propose to decrease the damage output of the static T2 arty?

          "Design is an iterative process. The required number of iterations is one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any point in time."

          See all my projects:

          F 1 Reply Last reply 26 Dec 2023, 00:58 Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            FunkOff @IndexLibrorum
            last edited by 26 Dec 2023, 00:58

            @indexlibrorum If the balance team deems it necessary to reduce the raw DPS of the T2 static artillery for this purpose, then I'm sure it is a needed change. I will only add that a transition from low arc to high arc will likely change the effective DPS of the T2 static arty without needing to change the raw DPS because it's much more likely to miss entirely and less likely to hit valid targets behind the intended target even when nominal misses occur. Therefore, the high arc will reduce the raw DPS somewhat, but a range increase may make a nominal damage decrease necessary in addition to that.

            L 1 Reply Last reply 26 Dec 2023, 03:55 Reply Quote 0
            • L Offline
              Lunyshko @FunkOff
              last edited by Lunyshko 26 Dec 2023, 03:55

              @funkoff I dont understand why t3 mobile artillery should be better than t2 stationary when the t2 costs x2.5. Also if you make some cringe arcs with t2 artillery its going to be a huge buff to a fatboy, the things are more interconnected than meets the eye.
              A small incompetent balance change may lead to enormous amount of balance tweaks in other areas that will ruin balance, balance is not about arty vs ships, its about how every units is interconnected to each other, also note that if you make too much of an arch the air units will be hit, rn they dont fly that high

              "Good luck and a safe landing commanders!"

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • S Offline
                snoog
                last edited by 26 Dec 2023, 04:23

                As a general concept, I fail to see why mobile artillery should be better than stationary. Also, do people actually think t3 mobile arty needs a buff? I don't think I've ever seen anyone ask for that. I see them used quite often and they can be exceptionally good at base breaking unless countered by Ravagers or even more T2 arty.

                F 1 Reply Last reply 27 Dec 2023, 23:00 Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  MazorNoob @FtXCommando
                  last edited by 26 Dec 2023, 11:46

                  @ftxcommando said in Fix tactical artillery - Battleships/T2/T3 mobile artillery:

                  made uef the worst at yet another tech level

                  Made a list just to check if it's true.

                  T1 land -> arguably yes, but not by a lot
                  T2 land -> no, Cybran is
                  T3 land -> no, Cybran is
                  T4 land -> sure

                  T1 air -> arguably yes, but by a tiny margin
                  T2 air -> yes
                  T3 air -> no, Sera is
                  T4 air -> arguable since they have Novax and it's not like Cybran bug is any good

                  T1 navy -> after Aeon buffs, sure
                  T2 navy -> no, Cybran is
                  T3 navy -> no clue
                  T4 navy -> no, Cybran and Sera are by not having naval exps

                  S 1 Reply Last reply 26 Dec 2023, 14:52 Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    Sladow-Noob @MazorNoob
                    last edited by Sladow-Noob 26 Dec 2023, 14:52

                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F Offline
                      FtXCommando
                      last edited by 26 Dec 2023, 17:48

                      cybran worst at t2 navy, ur actually insane

                      and i was talking about navy stage

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Offline
                        FunkOff @snoog
                        last edited by 27 Dec 2023, 23:00

                        @snoog I would like you to find a single LOTS game in which they were used. (I believe I saw one, myself, but just one. And I wont tell you which it was 😜 )

                        S 1 Reply Last reply 28 Dec 2023, 01:42 Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          snoog @FunkOff
                          last edited by 28 Dec 2023, 01:42

                          @funkoff Don't even know what LOTS is.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          17 out of 19
                          • First post
                            17/19
                            Last post