Group Details Private

Team Lead

The FAF leadership team

  • RE: Proposal for [Challenge Accounts] | Feedback Wanted!

    Two cents from a trainer perspective:
    As you (aka. the ppl somewhat following discussions on the FAF discord) know, there is an ongoing discussion about the classic "how do I beat turtles?" or other things were trainers most often just give a theoretical advice bc we don't encounter turtles anymore so we can't show a decent gameplay.
    With a challenge account it'd give us (= trainer team) a chance of showing exactly these type of things, similar to a thing such as "Bronze to GM series". We could play 1v1 ladder (yes, I'm basically asking for an exception), downgrade our gameplay so we play without manual reclaim and stuff and point out the important things. Atm it's the only way I see for really showing it cuz I've tried playing against low ranks with my main account, but they end up either being intimitated, trying cheese or simply not playing "standard", which we could avoid with an extra account.

    For challenges itself, I don't really see a reason why you'd need an extra account if said account has a unique avatar basically giving away "oh hey, I'm a secret high ranked going to cheese!", could just use the own account for that. For me it'd require the account to be somewhat undercover so the other ppl play normal.

    posted in General Discussion
  • Improvements to appeal process and FAF rules

    Hi everyone, as we kick off 2025 we wanted to make you aware of some updates related to the appeal process, an update to the FAF rules page, and the publication of a dedicated information page on the reporting and appeal system.

    TL;DR: see the bottom of this post.

    Improvements to the appeal process

    Decisions by the moderation team, such as bans and mutes, can be appealed. This system is designed for requesting a second evaluation of the decision and correct eventual mistakes or miscommunications. We have previously received feedback on the waiting time of the ban appeal system. Due to how this system was organized, appealing short bans often took longer than the ban itself; less than ideal.

    In order to improve the appeal process, we have adopted a new way of submitting appeals. Where before you were required to send an email, appeals may now be filed through the FAF discord using an appeal-ticket. You can create such a ticket through the #Moderation-support channel in the FAF discord. When submitting a ticket, we ask you to explain why you believe your ban should be reduced or revoked. Your appeal will then be reviewed by at least two moderators who did not handle the original report.

    We have been testing this new system for a few months now, and have been happy to see that appeals get processed much faster. The feedback we’ve received on the new system has also been very positive. To make sure that people who cannot or will not use Discord can file appeals, we will also keep the old email system in place.

    We have created a new webpage that explains this process in detail. There you can find detailed instructions on how to file an appeal, as well as an expanded explanation on how the report and appeal system works.

    Clarification of existing rules

    The FAF rules page is another subject we have received a lot of feedback on. Because of this, we have spent the past months rewriting and reorganizing the page. There have not been any new rules added that were not already moderated previously. The page has been improved by:

    • Removing duplicate and/or similar rules
    • Improved organization
    • Clarifying previously not explicitly stated rules
    • Overall update and made rules more clear

    While we do not think it is possible to write a rule set that covers all possible scenarios, we have done our best to remove ambiguity as much as possible. Examples of rules that were not explicitly stated include the ban on political discussion in general chat channels (the decision to moderate was announced in a forum post), and the ban on base CTRL-K (which fell under the vague ‘You will not ruin the game intentionally by any means’ rule).

    Changes to the rules relating to quitting games

    One rule has been changed: the rule relating to leaving games mid-game. As part of our approach to making rules less ambiguous, and given the varying opinions we've heard within the community about leaving games, we have sought the views of the FAF association on what rules to have for people who leave games. The results of these polls have been reflected in the updated rules.

    • Previously, leaving games that were not decisively lost was considered a violation of the "do not ruin games" rule.
    • Based on the poll results, players will now only be in breach of this rule if they leave within the first 5 minutes of a match or if they frequently leave games (defined broadly as three or more reported incidents per week).

    FAQ

    Additionally, we have written a ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ section on the rules specifically and moderation in general. You may find this FAQ, as well as a section explaining how we determine the duration of a penalty, on the report and appeal system webpage.

    TL;DR

    • Appeals can now be filed faster through Discord using an appeal-ticket system, with reviews handled by at least two moderators. Email appeals remain an option, and the new system has significantly reduced response times.
    • The rules page has been rewritten to improve organization, remove ambiguity, and clarify previously implied rules, like bans on political discussion in chat and base CTRL-K actions. No new rules are added.
    • The rule on quitting games has been changed following a vote by FAF association members. It is now considered a violation only if a game is left within the first 5 minutes or if frequent quitting occurs (3+ times per week).
    • A new FAQ which explains rules, moderation policies, and how penalty durations are determined, is now available on the report and appeal system webpage.

    Thank you to the moderation team for the work with the updates and the community in general for the related discussion and feedback.

    posted in Announcements
  • RE: Connections problem due to germany 1 server?

    The German coturn server seems to have crashed on the 09.01. with an out of memory error as it seems. It is back up now.

    posted in General Discussion
  • RE: Ladder Rant....because I am noob

    I can't tell you why it feels like your matchups have changed, but I can assure you that it is not because of the season change. The part of the backend that does the matchmaking doesn't even know about the season change.

    And you should not have to play 10 games again when you were ranked in the previous season. It should only be 3 in this case. It could either be that the client gives you wrong info (which would be a bug in the client) or you indeed have to play 10 games, which would be a bug in the backend. If you could try it out and report back that would be really helpful to fix the bug.
    We don't simply carry over the rank from last time because we want the leaderboard to only consist of active people.

    posted in General Discussion
  • RE: Ladder Rant....because I am noob

    I'm not sure if I understand this correctly, so feel free to interrupt me;
    FAF still uses the ranking itself to balance matches and not the league. If you're 2000 rated but in diamond league, you'd still end up playing against masters / grandmasters and stuff.

    The only thing which resets is the league displayed, but it has no impact on the game balance / quality, it's purely for decoration atm. So yeah, FAF doesn't just forget your skill or ranks you lower, just keep in mind your ranking number matters and not the leagues.

    posted in General Discussion
  • RE: Is this allowed?

    It's allowed

    posted in General Discussion
  • RE: 1v1 u1500 Tournament 2!

    Our Tournament has Concluded, thanks to everyone for playing!

    Our top three:

    1. Cunningfox
    2. AkiraFAF
    3. Index/Fox2Code
    posted in Tournaments
  • RE: ReUI

    Apple Vision Pro required for usage? 😛alt text

    posted in Modding & Tools
  • RE: 1v1 u1500 Tournament 2!

    @Nuggets refer to this message by bully in our rules and roles channel:
    "We may ask players with a global rating significantly higher than their ladder rating to play a few ladder games, if they don't already. If you think this concerns you, you can already get started 😎"

    play some ladder please, 5-10 games if possible, see where your rating ends up, Vindex Paradox Bully and I can discuss it.

    posted in Tournaments
  • RE: 1v1 u1500 Tournament 2!

    @Nuggets Team Lead doesn't know a lot about the forums : )

    posted in Tournaments