FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Pending Balance Changes Feedback Thread

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    224 Posts 53 Posters 42.3k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      FunkOff
      last edited by

      I think nerfing teleport this bad is a mistake. I think some other common sense solutions are better, such as a cooldown on the ability up to 60 or 90 seconds, perhaps a warning that it's being used ala nuke (warning sent when teleport sequence is initiated) and or a 10 or 20 second stun time after teleport completes and before weapons turn on (but move/build still allowed)

      There are lots of ways to nerf telemazer that dont totally kill it. Also, importantly, the nerf doesnt even do that much to stop it there is a lake or sea near an enemy base or acu which could be used as a safe intermediary jump point before and after the kill jump

      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • waffelzNoobW Offline
        waffelzNoob
        last edited by

        the changes you propose are even harder nerfs to tele

        frick snoops!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
        • N Offline
          Nex @FunkOff
          last edited by

          @funkoff said in Pending Balance Changes Feedback Thread:

          Also, importantly, the nerf doesnt even do that much to stop it there is a lake or sea near an enemy base or acu which could be used as a safe intermediary jump point before and after the kill jump

          That is the intention probably?
          It's not so that you simply can't get a useful telemazor off (which your changes would do), but so that the enemy has more time to react to it.
          so if you need 2-3 hops to get to the enemy base, then your opponent will have more time to react to the teleport and will also possibly be alerted by the sudden appearance of a radar signature.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • Chenbro101C Offline
            Chenbro101
            last edited by

            Just make it so you cant tele inside anti nuke radius. You can then buff tele however you like to be better in other situations. Job done.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
            • veteranasheV Offline
              veteranashe
              last edited by

              I would like to see how a warning pops up like nuke, could do it when the tele starts or when you actually tele

              TheVVheelboyT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                snoog
                last edited by

                You already get a warning when you actually tele, it's the sound of the laser killing you.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TheVVheelboyT Offline
                  TheVVheelboy @veteranashe
                  last edited by

                  @veteranashe said in Pending Balance Changes Feedback Thread:

                  I would like to see how a warning pops up like nuke, could do it when the tele starts or when you actually tele

                  That's a great way to make sure tele stops being useful snipe tool. Now everyone can just walk away or get countermeasures ready in no time. Making sure that you will never come back from the tele attempt.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • veteranasheV Offline
                    veteranashe
                    last edited by

                    If the warning prompts right when tele happens I'm not sure on countermeasures.

                    If tele warming prompts at the start You can get tele just to mess with people by clicking tele and cancelling

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ? Offline
                      A Former User @veteranashe
                      last edited by

                      @veteranashe Make it uncancellable

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        TankenAbard
                        last edited by

                        I actually like the idea of telesnipes as a late game win option. It's desperate, and it's not very difficult to stop.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • veteranasheV Offline
                          veteranashe
                          last edited by

                          Can't remember if I mentioned this before but make a constant move order like patrol but you don't stop moving, ever. A lot harder to snipe in general

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                            Zeldafanboy
                            last edited by

                            It seems like the game is being taken over by people who are anti-snipe. Over the years, Firebeetle Drops, Mercies, T3 bombers, and now Telemaser have all been gutted. People just want to sit back and play simcity

                            put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T Offline
                              TankenAbard
                              last edited by

                              pulling a fast one on people is a great feeling.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • FtXCommandoF Offline
                                FtXCommando
                                last edited by FtXCommando

                                What's with the constant fear of creating something new that's good? You see the current issue with uef shield is that it's too expensive for the hp so the solution is to make it cheaper but also make it shittier in survivability again? It's supposed to be some mongoose upgrade when half the boon of mongoose is the speed which you now can't use because they are tethered to an ACU that has a more expensive but shittier survival upgrade in every way than Aeon?

                                If the point is testing things out in beta why don't you err on the side of making things good enough to actually break the meta inertia and use the new toy rather than it being too bad aside from 1 in 3400 game scenarios but when that scenario actually arises you forgot the upgrade exists to actually test it out.

                                ZeldafanboyZ TheWeakieT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                                  Zeldafanboy @FtXCommando
                                  last edited by

                                  @ftxcommando

                                  The balance team doesn’t want the inevitable blowback when people start dying and losing rating to the new good thing in the days/weeks before people discover counterplays. It just causes more stress and work for them with regards to keeping FAF humming along and growing. People can drop games over stuff like that. Nobody playing now is going to drop the game because it’s still mostly like it was X years ago. That’s kind of the appeal.

                                  put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • RoweyR Offline
                                    Rowey
                                    last edited by

                                    https://patchnotes.faforever.com/fafbeta.html I've updated the beta Patchnotes page for what is live on FAFBeta

                                    "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" - Spock

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                    • TheWeakieT Offline
                                      TheWeakie @FtXCommando
                                      last edited by

                                      @ftxcommando said in Pending Balance Changes Feedback Thread:

                                      What's with the constant fear of creating something new that's good? You see the current issue with uef shield is that it's too expensive for the hp so the solution is to make it cheaper but also make it shittier in survivability again? It's supposed to be some mongoose upgrade when half the boon of mongoose is the speed which you now can't use because they are tethered to an ACU that has a more expensive but shittier survival upgrade in every way than Aeon?

                                      If the point is testing things out in beta why don't you err on the side of making things good enough to actually break the meta inertia and use the new toy rather than it being too bad aside from 1 in 3400 game scenarios but when that scenario actually arises you forgot the upgrade exists to actually test it out.

                                      Meet cybran nano. To this day there are enough people (Also 2k+ players) that think it's still as OP as the first iteration and those people are still complaining about it even though it has been nerfed massively compared to how strong it used to be.

                                      Aside from that i honestly don't know how you came to this conclusion. You're cherry picking the mass and hp changes the uef shield, even though the biggest changes are focussed on the e cost, regen and recharge time
                                      01a41a99-27a1-464c-aacb-103814a5ba9e-image.png
                                      This makes it have a faster recharge time than first aeon shield, which is widely considered to have an insanely good recharge time.

                                      We don't want to underbuff units yes, but obviously we don't want to overbuff them either and try to get their stats as accurately as possible from the get go. Aside from that i do intend to rather overbuff than underbuff units so it's easier to get data (especially since it's beta), but as you yourself know we have 0 data on the current shield which means it's harder to estimate how it will behave in a game.

                                      I think this is still a big buff compared to the current UEF bubble shield. Will it be enough of a buff since it's bad atm? who knows. Sadly due to a lack of github enthusiasts this suggested bubble change that was decided on the 1st of october isn't in beta yet so we haven't been able to test it to see whether it needs further adjustments or not.

                                      FtXCommandoF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • RoweyR Offline
                                        Rowey
                                        last edited by Rowey

                                        @TheWheelie I've made the changes, I am just awating Tagada to Approve

                                        "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" - Spock

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • T Offline
                                          Tagada Balance Team
                                          last edited by

                                          Will do so when I come back home

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • veteranasheV Offline
                                            veteranashe
                                            last edited by

                                            Im curious why didnt uef bubble shield just carbon copy the personal sheild except the bubble part?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post