FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Small suggestions topic

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suggestions
    291 Posts 90 Posters 72.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JipJ
      Jip @arma473
      last edited by

      @arma473 said in Small suggestions topic:

      Suggestion: make it easier to swap positions with another player. I'm not exactly sure what this would look like.

      From the perspective of the host we have this:

      3c2e2149-5f6e-40f6-a39c-45ae87d43233-image.png

      We could expand this feature to allow swapping between players: if a player requests a swap then the player number becomes green? The user in question can then just ignore it if he / she sees fit.

      I think that it is important that the host feels in control of the lobby however, so what if a player wants to swap with an AI? Do we insta-accept that?

      A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

      arma473A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • arma473A
        arma473 @Jip
        last edited by arma473

        @jip said in Small suggestions topic:

        I think that it is important that the host feels in control of the lobby however, so what if a player wants to swap with an AI? Do we insta-accept that?

        I would say no, players should not be allowed to offer swaps to any slot that does not have another player in it.

        If a player stops being in the spot (they leave, get kicked, move to a different slot, move to obs) the offer should be taken back.

        If the player in that spot changes (if the host swaps them, or if they swap with someone else) the offer should automatically be taken back.

        If the player who offered the swap moves to a different slot (for any reason) the offer should be taken back...

        If offers didn't automatically get taken back under those circumstances it could cause problems.

        Also, you would have to make sure that someone couldn't maliciously set it up to allow themselves to "accept" offers that haven't been made. Or else they would be able to always force their way into any slot.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          relentless
          last edited by

          Add a reclaim metric to the post game graph. Actually I've never checked if its recorded during the game, I just remember it from the supreme score board during replays.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • R
            redhotchilipeper
            last edited by

            • as it's already been said, having an audio alarm when power stall is about to happen is nice, but also when you overflow mass and/or energy ? could help very bad players like me...

            • same when a factory goes idle, and when your acu is really low on hp, like 2 or 3k hp...

            • having engies on reclaim prioritizing high value items would also be a great improvement

            • I suck at 20x20 maps, so when chosing which custom game to join, having the size of the map displayed could help...

            Ctrl-KC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Ctrl-KC
              Ctrl-K @redhotchilipeper
              last edited by

              @redhotchilipeper
              First two are strange, but i think there are already some mods can do this.
              Third is impossible because it effects engine part.
              Forth: you can hover over Map name with mouse in lobby and see its info.

              โ€œBe a yardstick of quality. Some people arenโ€™t used to an environment where excellence is expected.โ€
              โ€” Steve Jobs.
              My UI Mods
              Support me

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                Nijntje_Piep @Jip
                last edited by

                @jip
                Thanks for all the work you do!
                I would like to suggest a small change if possible.
                Having mouse buttons be available as key bindings would be super.
                Tanks in advance.
                Kind regards!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JipJ
                  Jip
                  last edited by

                  I'm afraid that that is engine related and out of our control ๐Ÿ˜ž .

                  A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nine2N
                    nine2
                    last edited by

                    The one about sharing team radar circles is golden. We need that

                    JipJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                    • R
                      redhotchilipeper @Ctrl-K
                      last edited by

                      @ctrl-k thanks for your answer ๐Ÿ™‚

                      well for the first two, as I said, it can be a big helper for bad players like me, I understand it may look awkward for peolpe with more practice of supcom ๐Ÿ˜‰

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JipJ
                        Jip @nine2
                        last edited by

                        @nine2 said in Small suggestions topic:

                        The one about sharing team radar circles is golden. We need that

                        I look forward to your pull request ๐Ÿ™‚

                        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • D
                          Defiant @Elmi
                          last edited by

                          @elmi To limit people spamming pause, host the game with only 3 pauses.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • W
                            wikingest
                            last edited by

                            Suggestion do load nukesubs automaticly. If basicly everybody builds nukesubs for nukes (and not for other things), why do we need to start loading manually every time? Tml's, antinukes, nukes on land etc. load automaticly. But with nukesubs, we need to keep eye on factory, to see when it is ready, sometimes find the nukesub in the middle of other things, and start loading manually, every nukesub. Seems like artificial difficulty, that should be easy to change.

                            JipJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                            • gabrilendG
                              gabrilend
                              last edited by

                              My suggestion is to allow factories to set their waypoint to a unit group. When the factory finishes constructing a unit, it'll receive the same orders as the rest of the units in the group. If there's more than one order, it'll assign one randomly (or maybe by unit type)

                              The reason I want this is because then I can setup air patrols to be continuously replenished by a factory. Right now if you make a patrol order from a factory then give an order to the patroling units, there's no way for them to rejoin the patrol again. But if a unit group had the order and the factory was just assisting the unit group, then you could give the units any order you wanted and the factory would create more units for them.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • JipJ
                                Jip @wikingest
                                last edited by Jip

                                Work is being done to work on the suggestion of @Giebmasse , see also this and this pull request on Github. And from another topic a pull request emerged about adding an ETA timer. We're getting there to implement some of these suggestions. Note that some suggestions appear small, but they may be difficult because they require engine changes. We can't do that for the average suggestion.

                                @wikingest said in Small suggestions topic:

                                Suggestion do load nukesubs automaticly.

                                I'll ask around if this is desirable.

                                A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                QuietJoyQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • QuietJoyQ
                                  QuietJoy @Jip
                                  last edited by

                                  @jip said in

                                  I'll ask around if this is desirable.

                                  make sense to me to load them automatically. Nuke launchers and smd on land load automatically. A nuke subs only real purpose is to launch a nuke so yeah autoload please ๐Ÿ˜Š

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • S
                                    Sprouto @QuietJoy
                                    last edited by

                                    @scout_more_often It makes sense - IF - the cost of the missile is included in the cost of the unit. This should be true of any unit which is required to 'build' ammunition. SMD, SML, TML or otherwise.

                                    We implemented this choice into LOUD some years ago, allowing players to determine IF missile units were to be autoloaded, and by how much. Needless to say, autoloading does encourage certain behaviors.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      thecore
                                      last edited by

                                      While on the topic of nuke sub, should they be able to make anti-nukes (smd) as well? So the player could have an option to either make a nuke or anti nuke from the nuke sub.

                                      Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                                      QuietJoyQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DeribusD
                                        Deribus Global Moderator
                                        last edited by

                                        That's more of a balance change

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • QuietJoyQ
                                          QuietJoy @thecore
                                          last edited by

                                          @thecore i like this idea, would be great if the balance team could consider it. Would give an option to build smd for water areas of the map ๐Ÿ˜Š

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • G
                                            ghnaf
                                            last edited by ghnaf

                                            Suggestion: Make the factory engineer attack not ending.

                                            Engineers lose this sweet sweet mode when they canยดt find any mass or sometimes randomly.

                                            The annoying part is, you have always to watch if there is still mass on the ground, if you are 2 secounds to late
                                            the engenieers go idle and leave the attack mode, despite you would like to send them to another mass.

                                            When they donยดt lose the attack mode you can be more relaxed and move the factory attack waypoint just later.

                                            I donยดt know if this is an issue, but someone could send some engineers to a location as a weapon and try to eat enemy units,
                                            but this would be probably a very bad deal.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post