A Topic of Dumb Ideas!

FtXCommando

siege tank is redundant but it sounds cool

Azraaa

@FtXCommando said in A Topic of Dumb Ideas!:

siege tank is redundant but it sounds cool

:wesmart:

Azraaa

How is the spilling lagging the game? I'd love to know more about that, seems that it wouldn't be that expensive to compute each tick.

So each projectile that hits the shield has to be calculated, now test by throwing like 10 janus at a shield and watch ur simspeed drop massively

deletethis

@Azraeel No, what difference does it make?

edit: Thanks for the helpful reply.

Jip

Oh - that kind of spilling. I thought you were talking about economical spilling, e.g., spilling to allies.

Azraaa

@deletethis said in A Topic of Dumb Ideas!:

@Azraeel No, what difference does it make?

A lot

Mvk_-

Rather a Siege or Assault Tank or whatever, by name sake would seem relevant in say Supcom FA, FAF or just the Seraphim why that might have specific attributes to it, mostly from some storyline say aspect buy could just be more technical also.
Herb reclaim can be a say priceless feature but debatable for its say utility to function.
I've heard several times Engineering Stations are not as efficient as mobile engineers. Rather a reduction of build power is not, im not certain, but if applied they should gain an initial build capability. Rather a full t4 or just t3 is whatever for a question.
Mexes seem reasonable already, no need to change, perhaps adding where max Mex output is variable based on Mex location. Out of a total of say 4 maxes, 2 might end being lower valued outputs despite build.
T2 Scouts would be nice but to what effect?? Seems to be a lack of support by all factions for such a unit.
Unit veterancy may be a gameplay breaker but still offers gameplay changes. Solving some better way of calculative than ridding seems better off.

Photek

I agree that 'siege tank' might not be the right name.
You don't use it?
not an informed opinion
idem
I feel like adding t2 scouts is gonna create a different air play dynamic, which could be good but also bad.
Yes, you got my vote!

ZLO

t2 or t3 land scouts!

The_Janitor

t2 or t3 land scouts!

while on that note, how about a proper uef land jammers with proper unit formations

Azraaa

@ZLO said in A Topic of Dumb Ideas!:

t2 or t3 land scouts!

How'd that even work lol

Azraaa

Mobile Radar!

Pearl12

Just make siege tanks really good at killing walls. 1000 dps vs walls. Then they are siege tanks. Problem solved.

deletethis

mobile smd!

Photek

cybran T3 stealth sniper

Azraaa

@deletethis mobile smd would need assisting, so like basically has no Buildpower itself

@stealth9 just Cybran t3 Mobile Stealth instead

deletethis

@Azraeel you could think about sera battleship/t3 nuke subs only they make smd instead, the land equivalent would probably end up as t4 tier, or maybe extremely limited range...

ZLO

@Azraeel said in A Topic of Dumb Ideas!:

@ZLO said in A Topic of Dumb Ideas!:

t2 or t3 land scouts!

How'd that even work lol

More HP, much more speed, much more radar range, more vision, maybe tiny omni range, improved versions of abilities of lower tier units... like t1 arty-like thing for UEF scout, stealth+cloak for cybran, ability to traverse montains and walls for aeon, short range teleportation for sera or maybe some EMP ability to disable single unit for 10 seconds for 5000 E or something like that... or maybe that ability would only work against buildings idk

arma473

@Pearl12 Give siege tanks an engineering tool same as a t1 engineer, except have it auto-reclaim on nearby unfriendly walls, and don't allow it to be used for other purposes. Call it a "siege drill"

moses_the_red

I actually don't think this is dumb, but I imagine its the kind of idea that people will just hate.

I think that reclaim micro needs a nerf, particularly in the case of map based reclaim.

So... what is the purpose of putting reclaim on a map? Its there to give players busy work. I'm not so much talking about large reclaim points or wrecks... those aren't so bad. I'm talking about small rocks and trees.

Small rocks and trees are an APM sink. If you're good and you have the APM you can sink a portion of it into collecting tons of little rocks and little trees to gain an eco advantage. If you're bad at it you can lose matches because fuck you, reclaiming little rocks mindlessly is hard baked into the very core of the game.

And its a significant enough eco advantage that your opponent must try to match you in order to have a chance at winning.

And you can do attack move or set up a circular path if you want, but you'll be at a significant disadvantage if you do against the clicky high APM types. The higher you go in ladder, the more critical clicking those little rocks become.

So now you have this APM race to the bottom set up where both players are forced to repetitively click rocks... forever... or at least through the early game.

Its a dumb idea, a dumb thing to do.

Rocks and trees should not be reclaimable. If you want to add reclaim to a map, add wrecks. Lets not add something that is repetitive, boring and gives you an artificial advantage that's not based upon the choices a player makes, but is instead based on the speed with which they can repetitively click the ground.

I haven't brought this up, because its so fundamental a part of the game, and because the ladder folk will balk (they've invested a lot of time raising their APM so they can be the clickiest players of all).

But its a bad mechanic. A terrible mechanic, and maybe if people started to see how stupid it is, we'd slowly be able to pull ourselves away from it.