Petition to remove UEF from the game?

waffelzNoob

bring back high hp uef buildings!!!!!

Yew

Given most of UEF units fire at the rate of a slug slugging it's way across the concrete on a wet, damp autumn morning, trying to get to the grass 1 meter away, higher HP isn't a bad idea. For all slow units at least

UEF should have double HP on everything, maybe even triple to make up for it's sheer lack of fire rate and slow movement on some of its units - like the summit for example, an absolute troll meme of a unit. Or the Atlantis. Half decent in numbers, an absolute joke on it's own. Also their t1 air fac, why don't engineers roll off in the direction you queue, like with other factions? Na UEF just likes to troll the fuck out of you as much as it can. What about the Neptune? Good on paper, appealing to the eye, damn that laser beam is sexy af. But what's the point of it. It gets annihilated by any battleship, and you can just counter with either submerged sera destros or mass t2 subs. That unit is a joke. It's recharge on the beam is too slow too. No surprise there. You can probably kill it with 20 frigs and chasing it down lol.

Back to summits though.. that unit is completely garbage. It misses 80% of its shots, making its effective dps 0.2x of what the unit db states. It moves slower than when our family dog was 14 years old nearing the end of his life, and would take him 3 hours to haul is decaying body 10 feet to eat his food. Also the unit is fat as fuck. You could't dodge a t3 arty shell firing at it on an 80km map.

Neytron

Не могу сказать что ты шаришь в этой теме

Yew

@Neytron said in Petition to remove UEF from the game?:

Не могу сказать что ты шаришь в этой теме

Please translate to spanish cause I don't speak arabic

Nuggets

Reviewing any unit on its own is just dumb. Can say that for anything in thr game. Why build a destroyer when it just gets overrunnby t1.
Lets remove all diversity and everything higher than t1

Yew

How is reviewing like for like units just dumb? I cannot compare a summit to an omen class? or a galaxy class? Saying it's dumb, is dumb.

Nuggets

@Psalm-19-1 said in Petition to remove UEF from the game?:

How is reviewing like for like units just dumb? I cannot compare a summit to an omen class? or a galaxy class? Saying it's dumb, is dumb.

Yes. You got it.

Tryth

Yikes

HAID_SOLO

funny post

and I also agree to some degree, I dread getting UEF (I play mostly random) specifically on navy maps

its so much easier to push with say omen/gc instead of summit/fatboy

it really feels like a faction thats good at stalling, but not winning

no idea how to fix it tho

snoog

Give fatboys a novax

KnownSniper

Make novax intel only building and give uef some experimental wars or blackops big ass airship

Very big

Yew

If it's too much work to remove the faction from the game, can we at least have a random but UEF faction option in lobby's.

Brutus5000

Let's go even further and remove all factions from the game. I guarantee it will once and for all settle all balancing disputes!

ipconfig-release

Pure lobby sim for the true, undiluted FAF experience

Yew

@Brutus5000 Removing all factions is extreme and we wouldn't be able to play the game. Just UEF.

TankenAbard

I can not take this seriously.

Nuggets

@TankenAbard said in Petition to remove UEF from the game?:

I can not take this seriously.

GG, in that case lock the thread!

Caliber

Novax & Billy Nuke = The two most cancerus things in the game both belong to the UEF

DDDX

are we just gonna ignore the op ranges the UEF has? Best ranged point defence turret, best ranged t2 bot, best ranged cruiser TML, best ranged arty, albeit t4, best ranged experimental....

Range baby! That's UEF's jam. The fact you don't list it as a strength is why you lose when you play as UEF.

SonOfThunder

@Psalm-19-1 that's Russian