The veteran FAF was never made clear as to its purpose.
So it got treated as a played/participated in FAF or FA for many years.
Hence why Mize and VIP have it as they are from GPG era
Personal/Custom Avatars
The board did not vote on any avatars. Tournament avatars are awarded at the discretion of the tournament director.
Okay, because then Noc's message sounds like a really strong bias honestly as the decision about the sanctions was explained in a different forum post. Acting on the own when it comes to things such as custom avatars is something I definitely don't support and the reason I'm asking for a clarification of the conditions.
@sladow-noob
Pepsi requested compensation as he could not get prize money due to the sanctions.
For no other reason than he requested as the board refused to pay him.
Ras Boi's save lives.
@sheikah Would not that mean they should only be permitted to assign avatars specific to the tournament - doesn't make sense their 'pallet' is all the avatars ever.
@NOC not trying to fry you here, just asking. ^^
Whatever the case, I don't mind working on special avatars for these odd cases, but they will for sure not be personal - they'd have to be based on the actual tournament avatars imo, or as I proposed earlier, we can make an avatar for everyone who ends up in this situation.
There has never been a strict policy on avatars, the tournament team and moderator team historically worked together to assign avatars from tournaments with whatever policy they saw fit.
in the discussion between the board, NOC and espi about the russian sanctions, espi requested a personal avatar as an alternative. I said that the board didn't talk about avatars, but that avatars are possible in principle, because they have no monetary value.
The discussion was maybe a bit unclear, because the terms "personal avatar" and "custom avatar" were both used without clarification what exactly everyone means.
As we can see the end result is that espi now has a personal avatar, but that was a decision of NOC, as the tournament team lead he has the permission to give out avatars. There also was no follow up to ask the board once the avatar was made to greenlight the avatar. As I explained, NOC doesn't have to do that, so no issue here, I am just mentioning this to make it clear that the board did not make any decisions about avatars as Sheikah already mentioned.
If there are no rules for avatar lets see what we had... Avatar Guidelines. Is it deprecated? It is not marked as deprecated. Since there were no new rules I think this one can be applied.
“Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected.”
— Steve Jobs.
My UI Mods
I think it is quite a shame that player receives ”high tier" avatar for having a prized place on a tournament. Such avatars, in my humble opinion, must be given to ones that did significant contributions into FAF project. I dont remember any for Espiranto.
“Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected.”
— Steve Jobs.
My UI Mods
@zer0d4y said in Personal/Custom Avatars:
If there are no rules for avatar lets see what we had... Avatar Guidelines. Is it deprecated? It is not marked as deprecated. Since there were no new rules I think this one can be applied.
Those were the rules that FtXCommando used when he was Player Councilor and was in charge of tournaments. They are not binding.
If these rules are not applied, then there are no rules cor avas, right? Everyone can have therse? Or I miss a part where someone made up new ones and didn't share? I don't get this approach.
“Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected.”
— Steve Jobs.
My UI Mods
That sucks though honestly. Speaking from my / our perspective (as I spoke with others via DMs) it literally just feels like a middlefinger we get thrown at us. We know we're not getting paid but getting told custom avatars are not a thing just to see a basically random person walking around with it the next day is insanely frustrating and irritating. If there are rules aka. if we can see why certain actions happen, there's no problem. But if some players have the permission to get such a status while the other contributors do not, then that's simply not a thing I support and get insanely annoyed about. Like unironically my/our motivation for the current projects just dropped quite a bit because of this.
@sheikah said in Personal/Custom Avatars:
At the moment it is mostly just driven by what has traditionally been done in the past.
What has traditionally been done in the past has been no personal avatars. The "no personal avatars" rule preexisted me being PC.
The issue is there is no oversight. Its not clear who has access to issue avatars and its not logged (anywhere I can see) who issued/uploaded them. It caused problems last year when someone decided to do a purge, created a discussion about who should control issuing of avatars and resulted in nothing happening.
As the espi avatar was related to tournaments it shouldn't be a personal avatar but a tournament one issuable to anyone who has turned down (voluntarily or not) prize winnings. Though it becomes more complicated with Gieb greenlighting it to some degree.
I have no idea about the 'FAF veteran' one because I wasn't even aware it existed, or where/who was responsible for giving it out. But as its not related to tournaments it is by definition only issuable by the mod team.
I think custom avatars should not be allowed for anyone. I also think if we have a faf veteran one it should have a clear criteria for getting it. Maybe u can get it if u have had a faf account for x years.
Only upon reading this did I even find out Rowey got a (semi?) custom avatar.
As a board member:
We have not discussed avatars in any capacity. If this you guys think this is an important issue then we can add it to our discussion topics for this month's meeting, but that would require some more detailed explanations of problems and proposed solutions.
As a moderator:
Avatars are something most moderators don't really want to deal with. We have enough to do without keeping track of who has what avatar and for what reason. Typically someone requests an avatar be give, we get some additional information to make sure they actually won the tournament or whatever, and then we grant it. At that point our work is done, we never want to think about this avatar again.
We have had an issue the past few months where avatars have disappeared from some users. We don't really know why. Could be a bug, could be some rogue moderators messing with us. We have no logging so there's no way to tell. Anyway this has resulted in the moderation team hating avatars even more so.
As a player:
The reason I haven't kept up with this discussion is because I personally don't care about avatars. I acknowledge they're important to a lot of the player base, but they're completely irrelevant to me. The only reason I even have a moderator avatar equipped is because moderators don't always show up in #aeolus and I've had at least one awkward interaction where I tried to give someone a formal warning and they were like "bro are you even a moderator?"
