List of participants in the main tournament:

Paralon 2214
Lunyshko 2121
TheEmperorTime 2002
ikigami 1970
ZLO 1963
BlInChIk 1959
Robogear 1950
FFF 1905
Wifi_ 1889
Swatoslav 1870
Vindex 1813
Inspektor_Kot 1796
Tarnow11 1518
Cunningfox 1507
PhantomSamurai 1488
White_Owl 1222

Players: Paralon; Lunyshko; TheEmperorTime; ikigami will choose their opponents into groups in snake pick order

Pick order:
1st four: Paralon - Lunyshko - TheEmperorTime - ikigami
2nd four: ikigami - TheEmperorTime - Lunyshko - Paralon
3rd four: Paralon - Lunyshko - TheEmperorTime - ikigami

Reserve players:

Neytron 1559
demonstreamer666 1134

More to come over the days as I get around to finishing some graphs I already had ready, but the weather is nice this weekend so we'll see if I have the time.

@Sainse said in FAF Statistics Megathread 2 Statistics Boogaloo:

Great and long-waited work.

To visualize this, in the graph below accounts are divided in 7 bins: the accounts with no steam or GOG link, accounts that are linked but played 0 games, and accounts that played at least 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10000 games.

Could you make the same graph but count only ranked (rated) games?

Yes, I didn't note it in the first post (I'll edit it later to include) but I also have all the end-of-game reports that include things like factions used, game validity, gametime, and whether it was ranked or not. I'll make some graphs related to that info soon. It'll be interesting to see the activity of rated games and compare them to co-op games and solo-with-AI games.

@rampeer ok, I will create a mod for this test in the coming week . Is there an estimation of what speed the launchers should get? similar to the T3 Sonar? or lower?

And I'd also like to discuss custom maps for 3x3
I often hear the opinion that we have very few custom maps for 3x3
Here is a pool of maps for 4x4

image.png

Close 1 more slot and any of these maps can be played 3x3 and it will be a good game

Restart PC just in case. Try to check security software if it blocks any FAF related files or process.

@IndexLibrorum i must have been mistaken then, was sure i got blocked from unpausing a few times. That's one problem less ig.

Before making a somewhat lenghty explanation as to what i think the problem is, i'd like to make sure i'm not starting from a wrong assumption: in ladder (and even custom unless people decide to change the setting) everyone has 3 pauses, right? If not, what's the current system like?

@Strydxr said in Proposal for [Challenge Accounts] | Feedback Wanted!:

Also, Challenge accounts don't have to be given out willy nilly, they can have a vetting process done by either mods or a chosen committee, which may help with keeping track of them.

This is one part the moderation team think is critical for this kind of account to work. If we wouldn't limit the accounts to a very low number and allowed whatever challenge, it would just be smurfing with extra steps. And the consequences of that wouldn't weigh up to the potentional benefits.

In any case, I've read all of the responses to this thread and I'm waiting for some free time to properly collate them all and discuss it with the moderation team. I hope to soon be able to share a more fleshed out concept, or maybe even an announcement for a trial run (if our internal discussion concludes with us thinking this could work).

Fuck it why not. If i remember to play. NOC- 1747

Map pool is released!

There's still time for sign-ups. Registraton will close 24 hours before the tournament.

v229 Update
Smaller update with 6 changes, primarily fixing some naval issues:

Text markers that M28 places for teammates should be removed after 90 seconds M28 should be less likely to think it has air control with small numbers of inties, and shouldn't try and attack air targets near the enemy base if it lacks air control Fixed several issues with how M28 calculates the nearest enemy naval unit in a zone (which would lead it to ignoring units in the same zone as it for parts of the logic)

Acknowledgements

Vortex - QUIET naval replay against v227