Sign up 1293 , why is first half of tourney bad maps and only then mapgen, wtf!!

I identify myself as vena242424.

@TheWeakie said in Add the Tombstones from the 2025 April Fool's Update as a Permanent Feature:

It could be added as a ranked sim mod

Its an idea but some people will filter out games with sim mods and others just ignore games when sim mods are enabled (especially as there is no way to see if a game is ranked or not - they will just assume its not).
Lobby option would be the best imo

Maps have been posted

So your problem is that people might be better at setons or dual gap only? xd

Can I sign up with my 1293 1v1 rating?

mods there appear to be people impersonating someone

Full reinstall includes: FAF, Supcom (on steam) and Java

@Created_in_abyss sorry, somehow i didnt see your first message

@Caliber said in Im done with billy nukes:

@Nuggets My point was UEF have no weak points unlike other factions, can you tell me one area that uef are weak in?

Such as Cybran shields and PD are weak.

Imo worst t2 navy and bad experimental stage

Btw, considering cybran shields weak is insane. Yes 1 to 1 maybe, but they are the cheapest and fastest to build, so i would consider them the best. Also cybran pd is very good vs t1 as it has 0 overkill. Uef pd (especially t3), does.

Not to mention all the things you listed earlier are just one side of the coin. You listed what they are good at but not the negatives of them. For example percies are very bad vs spam

You can also download working versions from the coop discord

The draft was a bit too close to the tourney date itself now that i'm looking back into it. Its mostly because of one specific player holding up the entire tourney for literally 1,5 days to see if he can play or not.
Sorry about that. Next time (if its the same setup) will probably be a week before or something like that

Oh boy, i can already see how this (if implemented) will get exploited, gg

I agree with it being unified, but do not agree to merge 2v2 and 1v1. Its a HUGE difference if you have a teammate you can maybe even rely on instead of doing everything else. I wonder why i dont search 1v1

Toxic discrimination!!! I will discuss it with myself.

@Jip said in Suggesting rule change: make immediately unpausing after a player asked for a pause against the rules.:

Some people do not appear to understand that this topic is a suggestion. And you can disagree with the suggestion without ridiculing it.

I very well knew this is a discussion, thanks for your kind reminder. I could disagree without ridiculing it. Maybe we should create a rule for it

Call it what you will, its still the fact of a subscription for a mod.
Another issue is that if you are "selling" the mod i actually expect support for the mod. I hate to say it but your history shows you dont really update the mods based on feedback (no, i am not talking about guess elo).

Also not a huge fan of the fact you edit the main post which was upvoted for "hype" reason and not mentioned a paywall or whatever you call it. And now its showing your Boosty as if people upvoted that. Regardless if people find it good or not its just the fact that the up or downvotes where for something else

@FtXCommando said in Another Novax conversation:

@Dorset said in Another Novax conversation:

Clearly there would have to be an adjustment to the cost of it because that 36k includes the laser, I try not to state the obvious when I'm speaking.

One thing is for sure. It seems pretty clear that it needs a rework. Been a hot topic for the 6 years I've been playing and nothing's been done about it.

The adjustment would be making it like 30k mass cheaper. It’s not a t4. You made a t4 unit a t3 unit.

It’s a combination of a soothsayer and an eye, nobody would be paying anything higher than 8k mass for this.

And doing this, now you need to explain what UEF compensation is for having no air t4.

Wdym? UEF even now has no air t4. Novax is way more similar to t3 arty than anything else, so why would this change need a compensation in the form of t4 air.
Obviously it would be good to see, but that has nothing to do with this.

@waffelzNoob i dont think so. Right now ladder rating = maps in the pool but not any kind of mapgen (or barely any)

And i dont think this is really an argument, because it some point it was asked to have a dual gap or astro specific rating and it got immediately dismissed

@Dorset said in Another Novax conversation:

I truly believe that allowing them to target each other is the best place to start. Why doesn't FAF take a year and make quarterly adjustments to see what the community prefers. 3 months of allowing Novax to target each other then 3 months of novax costing less but no laser and so on? I think the ultimate solution is allowing them to target each other but it can only be known if we try. Same as many suggestions. I also think that perhaps FAF just allow Novax to be unit restricted but still allow for a ranked match would be an interesting idea too. Whats a year of live "beta testing" to see what works. A year is nothing anymore lol

So i will try to take your comment seriously and try to explain.
By having Novax being able to fight / shoot each other would make the only counter to Novax, the Novax. Yes you could argue that you can still shield your stuff, but allowing them to shoot each other clearly shows that that is INTENDED to be the counter. I'm sure there are comparisions in different games but i believe that would categorize something as OP, if the only counter is in its own faction.
Its like saying only one faction will have AA and the others can just shield their stuff.

The 2nd biggest issue is, as i mentioned before, that by allowing novax to shoot each other, you create a 4th category to fight in, which includes only 1 unit. You have water, air and land, and you are now trying to create a category for a single faction. This is not the case currently. Currently novax is similar to an arty, just stronger (as you can only shield against it).
Dont really know how to explain this properly but i hope you get why creating a 4th category for a single faction is a bad idea?