@Brutus5000 said in New forum ui once again fucked up the design:

So we can raise a bug ticket but it's hard for me to tell what you think is wrong. So I assume the separator lines in the icons did not exist before?

What else?
You cannot detect the unread topics because you did not select the unread topics. Not sure what visual indicator you are missing, the default theme does not mark me already read topics in the recent view.

before you could clearly see in bold white what topics i have not read and in "normal" white which are already read. Now i can't really tell the difference.

I mean, can you easily tell the difference between read and unread topics in the screenshot i posted

@Brutus5000 said in New forum ui once again fucked up the design:

Which browser, which theme? Dark mode active I assume?

I am not using dark mode and everything looks normal.

I use opera. Wdym by dark mode? I use the skin "slate" (which worked perfectly fine until yesterday)

So yesterday there was a new update with the designs in the forum. Lets say its not optimal.
See here:

I can BARELY see which topics i have read and which i have not read. Also i dont know what is going on with the icons and lines in the top bar. Can this be changed back or optimized?

Thanks for your report @SplashGG

Please tell your friend to enable dark mode on windows.

Congrats to Team Wifi for 1st place, Team TheWeakie for 2nd place and Team Lunyhsko / zwaffel for 3rd place!

@Jip said in Suggesting rule change: make immediately unpausing after a player asked for a pause against the rules.:

Some people do not appear to understand that this topic is a suggestion. And you can disagree with the suggestion without ridiculing it.

I very well knew this is a discussion, thanks for your kind reminder. I could disagree without ridiculing it. Maybe we should create a rule for it

Its not about getting advantage (didnt think of that, but maybe also relevant). What i see with this is: someone got pissed off, pauses and says "brb" and people literally have to wait even though everyone knows its not a serious pause. Not to mention "oh misclick"

I tried to get a mod rated recently. The perfect organisation of FAF told me to talk to 3 different teams with each team telling me to talk to that guy and that guy and nobody could make the call to get it rated.

Oh boy, i can already see how this (if implemented) will get exploited, gg

In theory this makes sense but in practice this rule does not. I agree with snoog here, you can't create "anti-asshole" rules for everything, because everything can be exploited. Will there be a rule that a pause has to be for a serious reason also?

The draft was a bit too close to the tourney date itself now that i'm looking back into it. Its mostly because of one specific player holding up the entire tourney for literally 1,5 days to see if he can play or not.
Sorry about that. Next time (if its the same setup) will probably be a week before or something like that

Teams are now done. Thanks everyone for signing up, i might at some point do a follow up tourney with a rating limit so the players who did not get picked, get to play

sign up

Just unpin them all and create one thread that links them. Its horrible having to scroll down to see the actual reason why i clicked on the tourney tab
@Deribus ? Or idk who to message

Sign ups are hereby closed. There will be a channel in the official FAF discord, to which only the captains will have access. Picks will start as soon as the channel is created

I figured that, you will just not see many sign ups (i think). Not to mention there probably wont be any good longer games because its just to efficient to go for snipes

This was used in the previous 2v2 tourney (cant remember who the host was). Its the same thing. It makes almost no difference, as when the army dies its just over because all expansions get instantly overrun.

Btw, i think it is incredibly dumb to do "share until death". It just means that you start as a 2v2, you go for a t2 air snipe and as soon as one opponent is dead the game is over. You cant win a 2 base vs 1 (plus also the apm loss). I think you should do full share. The only way, i think, for no share to work, is in a 4v4 or more players

Sign up Nuggets 2006 + Deli 2078

@Created_in_abyss sorry, somehow i didnt see your first message