@Deribus said in UEF air factory engineer roll off direction:

@Nuggets said in UEF air factory engineer roll off direction:

We know why it happens. We just dont want it to be this way

@Psalm-19-1 said in UEF air factory engineer roll off direction:

Why do engineers roll out the UEF air fac

Unlucky. Guess Yew isnt educated in the ways of uef..

@Nomander said in UEF air factory engineer roll off direction:

Because the model only allows the engis to roll off from the front and the right side. Otherwise it works fine, it chooses the closest rolloff point for the queued order.

We know why it happens. We just dont want it to be this way

@TankenAbard said in Petition to remove UEF from the game?:

I can not take this seriously.

GG, in that case lock the thread!

It is a minor thing, but I basically notice this every single time I play UEF. Its so annoying even though it doesn't have that much of an impact. Probably because FAF pathfinding is bad enough without this

@Psalm-19-1 said in Petition to remove UEF from the game?:

How is reviewing like for like units just dumb? I cannot compare a summit to an omen class? or a galaxy class? Saying it's dumb, is dumb.

Yes. You got it.

Reviewing any unit on its own is just dumb. Can say that for anything in thr game. Why build a destroyer when it just gets overrunnby t1.
Lets remove all diversity and everything higher than t1

@Crofis said in Addressing the Decline of 1v1: A Proposal for a More Balanced FAF Experience:

@Nuggets Might be an idea, botted mapgen lobbies so people can join them and not get kicked for being too low. Maybe with a game requirements (like no more than X, or rank lower than Y). I have no idea on the tech side either, but good suggestion!

Doesnt have to be just mapgen. I think this would be pretty sick tbh to always see a hosted mapgen and teamgame by a bot which allows those kinds of ratings.
Its easier to use than queue, because it doesnt start automatically, so you can do something else meanwhile. Although it would need an auto kick function if a player doesnt x...

@Crofis maybe something hosted automatically by a bot?
Have a bot host your average teamgame map or mapgen (or both).
Its a huge difference to tmm, because you know the map and the players before the game. Not sure how well players would use this, but in my mind it should work fairly decently

On the technical side ofc, i have no clur + the fact that someone also has to do it...

You wont revive 1v1 by forcing players to play it. Instead you should think about making it more interesting. For me I will never queue 1v1 because I do not see the point of playing a random map and most likely getting a map I do not enjoy. It has nothing to do with the map pool, its just that I dont enjoy most of those maps.
The only way I would play (pretty sure others think the same) is if I could somehow select the map or select x maps (although most maps I enjoy are not even in the pool)

@Haidovic said in So why is the lobby option named like this?:

its the drunkenphantomfixes

fool!

It renamed my lobby options without my consent and used insulting terms!! Must have happened when i joined a random phantom lobby

So I deleted almost every SIM mod I had and was done to this list (including deleting the phantom mod, but the option was still ingame):

Then I deleted "DrunkenPhantomFixes" and the option disappeared.
After reinstalling the normal Phantom mod the option was back to normal. Then I reinstalled the DrunkenPhantomFixed and the option went back to "Fuck Youse Benny"

(Yes I got randomly motivated to do this. And @Saver regarding the mods on the list, most of them are from Sainse, Azot or myself)

Just posting this so you can do what you want with this information.

There you go!

Obviously there are some phantom mods here and there, but without deleting it (and maybe even have to reset game.pref) there is no way for me to tell if that is the mod doing this.

@Saver said in So why is the lobby option named like this?:

Take a picture of your mod list. Then it can at least be reconstructed.

The problem is not reinstalling the mods, the problem is figuring out which specific one is doing this.

I have no idea which mod is overwriting the phantom options and now that I know how this happened its honestly too much effort to figure out which specific one is doing this.

But now I know how to fix this, thanks

So I've posted this twice before, but apparently if I post this as a joke nobody understands it, so I will attempt to do a normal post for once.

In the lobby options, the option to select how many phantoms there are is named like this with those options to select:

What does this mean? xd

@Radiance said in Setons Summer Slam Tournament!:

Signups are officially now closed!

Alright, thanks for the tourney, see you next time!

@NOC said in Why not use STEAM NETWORK to improve connection?:

oh god one reason there alone not to. Voice comms
Im sorry I do not want to hear the 12 man dual gap russian voice coms

I would

@IndexLibrorum said in New account in FAF:

@NOC For as long as is reasonably necessary for the purpose of that data, as defined by the organisation, actually. Have a quick google to learn more.

@Nuggets said in New account in FAF:

I think "most" people here know which account we are currently talking about. According to what I've been told his smurf / alt account / whatever you want to call it was playing "a few months ago", not years (and then deleted and now he / she is here with a new one - allowed by faf because of "something he did for faf"). That being said, this is second hand information and might be completely false, as I do not have the option to verify this.

Allow me to clear that up for you: all of this is false.

okay, thanks. Figured as much because it sounded way too sus

If everything is as you have written @magge then I retract everything I said and find this completely reasonable.
I think "most" people here know which account we are currently talking about. According to what I've been told his smurf / alt account / whatever you want to call it was playing "a few months ago", not years (and then deleted and now he / she is here with a new one - allowed by faf because of "something he did for faf"). That being said, this is second hand information and might be completely false, as I do not have the option to verify this.

The main problem here for me is not doubting if anybody on the moderation team is lying, it is the reasoning that is being questioned here. Although questioning this, from my perspective, is not easy because, as i said, i only have second hand information.

Would actually be a good idea. Is there even an official youtube channel though?
Nice tactical shot!!!