Well, i think the reason everything seems worse is quite obvious.. the connection issues. It's as simple as: there are connection issues > games is not fun > am not motivated to play that much (or at all) > incapable of finding games (at least high rank games).
There are a bunch of complaints regarding this change or that change (which do have an impact), but i still firmly believe that the main issue is that i can't just start a game and know it will be a good game (connection wise).
The first seasonal Mapgen Tournament is divided into four distinct seasons, each representing 1-2 unique biomes from Mapgen. As players advance through the tournament, they will progressively experience the biomes of later seasons, showcasing the diversity of Mapgen.
Tournament Dates:
11.01.2025, 14 UTC for the Main Tourney
18.01.2025, 14 UTC for the semifinal + final
Tournament Director: Nuggets
Tournament Organiser: Sainse
Challonge: https://challonge.com/3v3seasonalmapgen
Communication: A Channel in the official FAF discord: https://discord.com/channels/197033481883222026/1323688978922213517
Captains-Channel: https://discord.com/channels/197033481883222026/1326590378949742622
Coverage: https://www.twitch.tv/faflive
200$ - Sponsored by FAF.
1st place: 150$
2nd place: 50$
(All payments must follow FAF official payment guidelines: https://forum.faforever.com/topic/7161/faf-official-tournament-payout-guidelines)
1st place avatar: 
2nd place avatar: 
3rd place avatar: 
If you would like to contribute please contact Nuggets (discord: nuggets3858) directly.
This 3 vs 3 tourney is open to everyone, single signups only with captains pick system (highest rated players pick out of the other signed up players). Captain amount depends on sign ups, but a minimum of 6 and maximum of 8.
Lowest rated to highest rated captain for first AND second pick.
Signups will close on the 8.01.2025 for the captains pick to then commence. Team-name can be sent after the pick is done.
This 3v3 tournament will be a Double Elimination with BO3s for each round in the top bracket leading up to a BO5 in the final. Loser’s round will be BO1, except for Round 3 and 4. Teams consist of 3 players.
For every game the lower rated captain picks the first map (and then alternating) which cannot be used again. There are no Vetoes.
See example here (Line showcasing the first and second day):
Pre-generated Mapgens ranging from 13.75km to 15km. Here are the maps sorted by biome (check challonge to see what biome applies).
Prayer (Spring):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_2kuhanlp7gp5k_ayfqecagaqaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_5olsex57hnbwu_ayfqecagayaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_kkv5b7jqofyno_aygaecagaaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_o37tmjsmcnv4s_ayfqecagaiaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_owavgud5elgic_ayfqecagauaag7l5
Wonder (Spring):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_jkavwb6ztlwfi_ayfqecalayaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_zbqwmeptqeyw4_ayfqecalbaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_zemtvo6dqvbxm_ayfqecala4aag7l5
Desert (Summer):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_3z6l55ixujatk_ayfqecabbaaac7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_7vystflniyyp2_aygaecaba4aag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_lumt66h7fk7vu_ayfqecabayaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_ovizjqwawzzye_aygaecabbiaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_qzazesm45emlm_aygaecabaqaag7l5
Stones (Summer):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_3rfzvvddshdig_ayfqecahaaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_bsf2tkse4as2k_ayfqecaha4aag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_xpg5lszfoxuom_ayfqecahaqaag7l5
Sunset (Autumn):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_5tqoj4aycbvek_ayfqecaibiaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_bvvtx63iyal6g_aygaecaiayaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_fzvmoftip575k_bagaecaiaeaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_r4u65meyrsi4y_aygaecaibiaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_wfm3l33qnjrfq_aygaecaibaaag7l5
Frithen (Winter):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_b7uvlkxztdol4_aygaecadayaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_k5a2cwqcew3wc_aygaecadbaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_omcpiej72fvce_aygaecadbaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_tdbgkhkcqr5qq_ayfqecadaaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_w56bzxr5u5kmu_aygaecadbiaag7l5
Crystalline (Winter - FINAL):
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_3l7tzvc2jfqhq_ayfqecambiaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_25loae6qwquyw_ayfqecamaaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_mnnk2mswc7jva_ayfqecambaaag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_q55npq7ne5ppq_ayfqecama4aag7l5
neroxis_map_generator_1.13.0_t6mv5pegqitce_ayfqecambiaag7l5
Currently signed up / picked :
In order to provide more equal opportunities for both teams:
"Lower rated captain picks first map, highest rated second map. After that the team who lost 2nd game choses 3rd map"
Map pick rules for Bo3 (and only Bo5):
"For every game the lower rated captain picks the first map (and then alternating) which cannot be used again. There are no Vetoes"
This post? Fantastic. Clearly addresses each of our concerns, points out problems our solution has, and describes where our communication has failed.
The situation is: mod team comes out with a (ridiculous) change. Now WE have to take the time to formulaten an article on why this is bad. You are saying it is not acceptable to just write "bad change, reverse". You want an entire article with pro, cons, examples and whatever.
How about YOU (mod team) post a 'proposal' and not a change that might be reversed if enough people complain (obviously this is not appicable to every change, but it clearly is here).
I don't even know how to say how ridiculous it is that a rule is getting an insanly strict update (not sure how to formulate that), and you expect people to go "Yeah ok, it helps moderation".
Maybe a bit of an exaggeration but this is what it feels like to me.
As far as i understand this mod is completely graphic and no balance change? Can this be flagged as ranked? As dumb as it sounds, i have no interest in playing it if its unranked, as also most people wont join
This is a pretty bad idea. Recall is the option for the team to vote if they want to continue the game. By disabling this, you are "forcing" play a game they might not want to continue.
Otherwise players will just randomly quit and that is even more frustrating / confusing for the team. In most of my games if I vote to recall, and my team votes no, i continue to play (even in a brutally crushed position) because apparently my team sees a way to win. If this feature didn't exist I would just leave.
Maybe some players don't "fully understand the impact of their choice" but they will do so after the first (or maybe only at the 2nd) recall. If they don't.. well, we can't change game mechanics because people are incapable of learning.
This change is actually insane. Aswell as the reasoning behind the decisions. Imagine creating rules based on the size of the community. Say faf suddenly grows by 100k people. Are we now changing rules because of that?
The real question is "who asked" (as in who asked to check / control usernames). I do not mean this as a joke. Up to now literally no moderator cared until there was a report. So it literally did not matter unless someone is annoyed about you and wanted to pay you back. Now I'm supposed to stick to username from myself and i better not rename to somebody else (even by accident)!
You (moderation team) are now saying EVERY player must know the other players. There can be no confusion on usernames. Do I even have to talk more about this?
The example with the confusion regarding screenshots also has little relevance in my opinion. Surely chat logs must be saved somewhere, so reports should only be possible with a timestamp. Just like when reporting something ingame.
Also, when is the discord username purge coming?
Apparently there is a guy on FAF since 2013 or something called Nugget, so i guess i'm not allowed to have my username anymore - gg (also getting ready to report anyone with Nugget in their name).
Hello.
I propose to remove the game.
This is not a secret and everyone plays it. Therefore, it is not needed at all.
It only forces you to play for no good reason at all.
There will be no need to write and maintain any code. You can just remove it all.
I hope at least this proposal will pass.
@jip said in Discussing the "rename rule":
@ftxcommando said in Discussing the "rename rule":
Does it contribute to a healthy environment to ban people that are having fun having impersonating names and not being toxic within the rules? Because currently like 10-15% of the active 1800+ players have taken each other’s names and are impersonating each other. Do we stop that?
Do you need to impersonate others to have fun?
What kind of question is that. Of course you can have fun without. Doens't change the fact that you can also have fun with the name changes.
It's like asking if you need to have ingame chat to have fun.
Congrats to Team Wifi for 1st place, Team TheWeakie for 2nd place and Team Lunyhsko / zwaffel for 3rd place!
@Brutus5000 said in New forum ui once again fucked up the design:
So we can raise a bug ticket but it's hard for me to tell what you think is wrong. So I assume the separator lines in the icons did not exist before?
What else?
You cannot detect the unread topics because you did not select the unread topics. Not sure what visual indicator you are missing, the default theme does not mark me already read topics in the recent view.
before you could clearly see in bold white what topics i have not read and in "normal" white which are already read. Now i can't really tell the difference.
I mean, can you easily tell the difference between read and unread topics in the screenshot i posted
@Brutus5000 said in New forum ui once again fucked up the design:
Which browser, which theme? Dark mode active I assume?
I am not using dark mode and everything looks normal.
I use opera. Wdym by dark mode? I use the skin "slate" (which worked perfectly fine until yesterday)
So yesterday there was a new update with the designs in the forum. Lets say its not optimal.
See here:
I can BARELY see which topics i have read and which i have not read. Also i dont know what is going on with the icons and lines in the top bar. Can this be changed back or optimized?
Thanks for your report @SplashGG
Please tell your friend to enable dark mode on windows.
Congrats to Team Wifi for 1st place, Team TheWeakie for 2nd place and Team Lunyhsko / zwaffel for 3rd place!
@Jip said in Suggesting rule change: make immediately unpausing after a player asked for a pause against the rules.:
Some people do not appear to understand that this topic is a suggestion. And you can disagree with the suggestion without ridiculing it.
I very well knew this is a discussion, thanks for your kind reminder. I could disagree without ridiculing it. Maybe we should create a rule for it
Its not about getting advantage (didnt think of that, but maybe also relevant). What i see with this is: someone got pissed off, pauses and says "brb" and people literally have to wait even though everyone knows its not a serious pause. Not to mention "oh misclick"
I tried to get a mod rated recently. The perfect organisation of FAF told me to talk to 3 different teams with each team telling me to talk to that guy and that guy and nobody could make the call to get it rated.
Oh boy, i can already see how this (if implemented) will get exploited, gg
In theory this makes sense but in practice this rule does not. I agree with snoog here, you can't create "anti-asshole" rules for everything, because everything can be exploited. Will there be a rule that a pause has to be for a serious reason also?
