What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?
-
@derpfaf said in What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?:
I think that for lower rated players who dont want to get crushed 10 times in a row till their MMR settles, some AI opponents might be an easy, friendly way into ladder 1v1.
Please show me evidence of these people getting crushed 10 times in a row. People match with around 500 rated players in the beginning and last I checked the win rate for the first ever ladder game of players was a bit under 50%
-
When I started playing ladder....at the very beginning...
I got crushed, but not 10 times in a row. Lots of both players flailing. Yes, I lost a lot, but I can't say it was super expert players on the other end, and winning was within reach. Usually
-
-
I don't mind @ThomasHiatt idea of 1 unranked game a day. I don't really get the mindset, because I don't value my rating as much as I used to, but it might help some people play more ladder.
-
I also don't think there is much to do other than highlight good ladder players and give them some non-monetary reward that makes them look important to the community. The nature of ladder makes people not want to play it, and since not many people play it, it is hard to get games and less people play it because it is hard to get games.
-
Although it is kind of hard to understand what Espiranto says due to the language gap, I agree with some of what he says. Most people don't want to get better, not at the cost of losing and having to self-improve. No way to change that.
-
-
Comparing 1v1 to 4v4, the main difference is for me that I have less things I HAVE to do in a set amount of time to be somewhat competitive in a team game. The stress of 1v1 is simply due to having to do too much.
It becomes (partially) about being the best at doing the most, instead of being the best at the core aspects of a strategy game - I have to compromise/prioritize so much that I just get annoyed that I know what I should do, but cannot. Of course, I have very low APM, so I might be more affected than most, but I think it is still valid as a principle - less things that require fast and continuous clicking means less stress:-Maps with no mex-clumping: Much more to react to and having to constantly micro units, meaning more stress to do that while also scaling
-Fully open/large maps: Same reason as above
-Navy, land + air all at once is stressful (more so for lower ratings because they generally are lacking the right hotkeys to deal with it)
-a COM is much more valuable in a 1v1 and yet, you basically cannot play without risking it (and micro-ing it) causing more stress and intensity (because of the fear of snipes or mis-micro). I dont really love this suggestion myself, but it might be a solution to make the com do less damage but have much more health in 1v1's. Gives more time to react, without it becoming OP.
-Small, manual reclaim chains: Huge APM drain from the very beginning so that when other things take more micro later, one is already getting somewhat fatigued -
@penguin_
I would love a mapgen only ladder queue. It would certainly remove the idea from newer players that they need map specific B.Os to play, and people wouldn't be focused on trying to rote learn maps off by heart, and start to actually learn the game itself instead! -
you do not need map specific build orders, you just need to get better at improvising them. nobody in the lower rankings has a good build order, otherwise they wouldn't be lower ranking. nobody in the higher rankings has a good build order either, they all just got good at improvising them
only map that i can think of that actually has a commonly used build order across the playerbase is loki
frick snoops!
-
I would like to propose a potential solution, albeit not necessarily the most optimal one.
In order to better accommodate players with sub-1k ratings, it may be worth considering the implementation of a restriction whereby they are only able to access land maps of dimensions 10X10 km that are randomly generated without pre-existing mass.
Furthermore, I suggest that we remove maps featuring pre-existing reclaim from the map pool for all ratings. Doing so has the potential to simplify the gameplay experience by reducing the complexity, meta-knowledge, and initial game pace.
-
@waffelznoob I do agree 100%, however newbies are in general terrible at improvising build orders, and thus gravitate towards rote learning instead in order to compensate. By removing their ability to rote learn, this lowers stress and will make them actually start improvising, because they know the other player has to do the same and therefore feel that the game is 'fair' (which makes them more likely to queue ladder). Perception shapes reality in this case and all that.
P.S And yes trees on Loki are fun to get out early bombers when you're lower ranked
-
Build orders are part of the game. I realy like it to see a map were I have a good build order. Also build orders are counterable. If I know what my opponent is doing then I can try to thwart his plans.
I'm not playing 1vs1 anymore as I simply don't like the maps. I would prefer 5x5 km land maps. The other maps are stressfull as you have to trop islands or you have a disadvantage against hover factions.
-
@mach said in What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?:
imo only mapgen ladder would be close to "fixing" it because it removes the map knowledge advantage, but it will always be "scarier" than other modes because 1v1 of any kind is hard
This would make me stop playing 100% because after awhile you realize Map Gen is not all that random and it becomes business as usual.
Not to mention a lot of the biomes are really awful to look at…
-
@waffelznoob said in What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?:
you do not need map specific build orders, you just need to get better at improvising them. nobody in the lower rankings has a good build order, otherwise they wouldn't be lower ranking. nobody in the higher rankings has a good build order either, they all just got good at improvising them
only map that i can think of that actually has a commonly used build order across the playerbase is loki
Crossfire canal, point of reach, the ditch (you be damned if you don’t know how to manage that unique amount of reclaim), tag craftious, ronoake, sera glaciers, theta passage, open palms, and tons more have unique openings.
You just don’t feel it anymore as you’re so used to it…
-
Also this thread title is leading people to believe something that is not true: reason Ladder is low in play at a decent level is because everyone is tired of it, and 4v4 tmm is the new, fun, social thing.
-
@cetea then do something that counters their build order. any disruption in their build order will force them to return back to their true level of gameplay. even something as crazy as first bomber can completely crush all the preparation they did
@Morax i dont have a bo for crossfire canal, its always improvised and always shit
i treat PoR, roanoke and sera glaciers as basic intie/trans rush BOs, ditch is the same as any other insane high reclaim map (which mapgen can be too), theta is unique i agree, and my tag/open palms build orders dont extend beyond land fac (pgen) 4 mex hydroAll this and im still able to sit somewhat comfortably around the 2k rating range. That is proof enough that lack of build order knowledge is not a valid excuse. Work on your general gameplay skills and you'll be able to work around it. Starting with a disadvantage never means an immediate loss even at the top tier of ladder play, let alone in a lower rated game
-
@morax said in What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?:
@mach said in What would make ladder less stressful, intense, or scary?:
imo only mapgen ladder would be close to "fixing" it because it removes the map knowledge advantage, but it will always be "scarier" than other modes because 1v1 of any kind is hard
This would make me stop playing 100% because after awhile you realize Map Gen is not all that random and it becomes business as usual.
Not to mention a lot of the biomes are really awful to look at…
sounds like mapgen just needs to be improved more, the concept behind it is sound itself
-
For me, it would help if the client did not fail to log back in after a disconnect. Forced to close client to log back in using the browser and can then not reconnect to a game.
-
isnt 1v1 ladder supposed to be intense scary and stressfull? i think its good as it is, its just not the kind of game experience i want most times. and who you can annoy with pinging when only you are there to make bad plays?
-
@voodoo I understand that b.os are a big part of the game, especially once you get to the top tier where it starts to matter a lot. It also gives a lot of different style of games because you get maps like the ditch, loki, where it's really satisfying to get it right and just get an advantage right off the bat via your superior opening. However it's also what drives away a lot of newbies since they think (incorrectly, but you can never get rid of the idea) that they need to have B.Os down to a science for every ranked map before they'll even touch it, which lowers the number of players who are willing to get into ranked.
If there was a way that made it where lower rated players just get map gen (i.e anyone below 1500 in 1 vs 1), while above that you start getting special maps, that would be pretty awesome IMO, because the higher skilled players get their special maps that they can have home field advantage on, while the lower rated players can relax (especially since B.Os really don't matter much below a certain rating anyway).
@waffelzNoob I agree as well, any early raids or aggression usually forces someone who's just rote learning a B.O to revert to their natural skill level, but most players are around the 700 rating skill level or something. So what is natural for any 1400+ player is basically impossible for these players already, they're too busy trying to sim city early on to do any raids, let alone do first bomber micro. Some of those players might be good enough to improve, and my idea is just to make the game seem less 'scary' to them, so they can play in ladder and hopefully improve and give the higher rated players more competition eventually.
-
I like the Idea of a mapgen ladder. Also I have no problem with includint AI as a possible opponent in the lower ranks (let's say below 500?). On chess sites you can also play vs AI of different difficulties which are considered to have a certain rating (Elo).
Of course you can set up your own game vs the AI but the element of randomness with the mapgen and the match getting rated sounds pretty appealing to me. It would also help newbies getting some expierience without getting crushed from more experienced players and avoid some frustration.
Another thing could be a 10min build up timer for games in lower ratings so you can focus on your bo without getting harassed.
-
increase game speed ie less hp for buildings, more damage(x2) for units.
simple as -
I don't like early raid as i don't have the apm to take care of my build order and take care of that single bomber/lab killing my engi
