FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. SiwaonaDaphnewen
    3. Best
    The current pre-release of the client ("pioneer" in the version) is only compatible to itself. So you can only play with other testers. Please be aware!
    S
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 29
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Fire beetle balance suggestion

      Last time balance team reworked it I suggested to redus its damage to symbolic 100, but add EMP with decent AOE to this unit.

      This way you can use Fire Beetles:

      1. Stun groups of enemy units or PDs when getting in close range with your army
      2. Save units on retreat. For example avoid enemy units to catch Hoplites

      Instead of killing something with Fire Beetle you stun it and kill with something else. No sniping ACU or eco structures, only useful against units and PDs.

      https://youtu.be/YasCEKgd0o4

      How do I link youtube on this forum?

      May as well just keep things as it is. It's more fun without Fire Beetles right?

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • Calibration tournament #2

      Calibration tournament #2.
      26.06.2021 18:00 (Moscow time).

      Tournament directors: SiwaonaDaphnewen (Apofenas), Inspektor_Kot
      Challonge will be announced by the start of the tournament. IRC channel won’t be used, instead we’re going to use tournament channels in Russian discord (https://discord.gg/rW6AHqr).

      Description:
      Last month we ran test tournament for low-rated players for Russian community. This time we got some funding and doing same for all FAF players.
      Tournament will take place in Rus discord, but not exclusive for Russian only.
      This tournament will have swiss-style or round-robin format depending on how many players we get. This is based on suggestions from last tournament so participants could accumulate replay base and ask personal trainers for analysis. (you will likely have to play 5-6 games during tournament regardless of results)
      Game rules are not standard, so take a look at details below. In short, time for game is limited, you get 20 minutes to kill opponent and if none of players succeeds – map starts shrinking every 5 minutes until 25% of map is left (min 40). Maps will be generated so there’s land in center of map. - this way we limit round length. Previously participants didn't even live long enough to see first shrink

      Player requirements:

      • Ladder rating is higher than 700, but lower than 1200; Global rating is lower than 1300;
      • Account was registered before 01.06.2021;
      • At least 50 games played total;
      • At least 10 ladder/matchmaker games played after tournament was announced.

      Tournament rules:

      • Tournament will happen if there’s at least 6 players registered;
      • Round robin system if we have 8 players or less, Swiss style if we have more;
      • Only 2 prizes are allowed if we have less than 8 players;
      • Sign up period will be closed 1 hour before tournament starts;
      • All participants need to be in discord channel 15 minutes before tournament starts;
      • Participants would have to get in voice channel and stream their screen to confirm their identity;
      • Draws are replayed on same map;
      • Desynchs and disconnects before minute 3 count as draw;
      • Desynchs and disconnects after min 3 count aren’t replayed, winner is decided based on FAF vault results;
      • VPN is restricted;
      • All players may be checked for rating manipulations, smurfing or giving their account to other players;
      • Situations that weren’t listed in rules will be decided by tournament directors.

      Game rules:

      • Tournament directors and streamers are allowed as observers, other observers are restricted;
      • Maps will be generated and listed in challenge when tournament starts;
      • Game mode: Claustrophobia;
      • Claustrophobia preset: Custom;
      • Claustrophobia Custom Preptime: 15 min;
      • Claustrophobia Custom Interval: 5 min;
      • Claustrophobia Custom Shrink Count: 5;
      • Claustrophobia Custom End Size: Not small;
      • All other settings are default.

      Prizes:
      1 place: Tournament winner+50$;
      2 place: Faction face+25$;
      3 place: Faction logo.
      Winner pays the commission for money transfer.

      Sign up:
      We use discord platform to run tournament. This means in order to sign up you need to send a private message to tournament director and state your FAF nickname and FAF ratings (Apofenas#2305 Inspektor_Kot#7713).

      Tournament sponsors:
      Morax
      SiwaonaDaphnewen

      posted in Tournaments
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Council of Setons EXPOSED - Part 1

      Ah lovely shitstorm. And this ugly forum...

      Yes, I did post announcement about Sanctuary RTS in Ru discord. Because I considered it to be a FAF project in a first place. It is being developed by people who worked on FAF here and there, it was planned to be free to play an it is being created based on community feedback (which mainly consists of FAF players). (correction i had info about it being f2p by the moment i posted it, but apparently it isn't - my bad XD)

      Creating mod based on 15 years old game engine with its source code being held in Square Enix is better?

      Then why posting about Plannetary annihilation on forums wasn't a problem when kickstarter campaing took place? If it wasn't for FAF i would never knew about PA. If it wasn't for FAF i would never knew about Zero-K when it got steam release.

      The discord post i made is not a problem of this conversation and i'm going to tell you why. What happened to it? It is still there!

      It is already second post about Sanctuary RTS and they both are still there! Nobody tried to reach me about it. Nobody tried to give me a warning after posting them. Nobody tried to ask or force me to remove them. Very likely nobody reached ZLO or Sid so they remove it instead of me.

      When this council shitstorm started nine reached me and in result i had to change some parts of text.

      I was open for chat and waiting for someone knocking on my doorstep trying to threaten me, but nobody did. Because NOBODY ACTUALLY CARES!

      Instead some councilors use this post to throw shit at each other in public. This proves that the actual issue is personal relationships between multiple mature people.

      And btw, Louvenarde wrote FAF rules and FtXCommando using links to those rules after he pushed her out of FAF is kinda funny...

      haha

      haha

      ha

      posted in General Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Torp bombers are too strong vs subs

      It's not the issue that torp bombers are too strong against subs. The issue is that subs are generally too weak.

      T1 subs are complete rubbish. I wonder if someone could take pure stats on how much frigates are being build in every naval maps compere to subs. Most likely t1 subs wouldnt even be built in most situations on all naval maps regardless of their size and player count.

      They have no role in this game. They lose to every unit with torps except what? Wagner? T3 sonar?

      EQ fixed that years ago. FAF didnt even bother to make it less worse. Because the point you start looking at naval balance and adjust t1 subs you will realise t2/t3 phase is way too unbalanced with different unit rosters for each faction (the way torp defence works is also a factor). I highly doubt someone in FAF team would do something this big.

      ...or if someone would just copy-paste EQ in FAF.

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Nuke Sub Rework

      Years pass, people still propose nuke subs to be reworked into billy nuke launcher...

      I did try that in Nomads and both the result and feedback I recieved weren't really good.

      Let's be short:

      1. Most naval units have damn TMD with huge range. Billy nuke as it is won't break through single cruiser/battleship/ect defence.
      2. Naval units are spread too much so you wouldnt kill many units pre missile meaning its inefficient against t1-t2 things.
      3. T3 units are too tanky. Billy nuke would be inefficient against Battleships even if it somehow hits them.
      4. Stacking Billy nuke with cruiser/torrent missile valley leaves little to no chance to defend the land firebase.
      5. Single Loyalist would kill your nuke sub and everything nearby because FAF can't copy EQ features since 2016.

      Current nuke subs are fine as they are for FFA games. Much easier to hide, much harder to understand who launched it. In most cases it is used for cybran because stealth is too cool, but sometimes could be used by other factions. This IS what should be done for all factions.

      IMO if nuke subs needed a billy, they should get it instead of their TML weapon (most of the time this TML is useless anyway), not instead of actual nuke.

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Absolver

      Not sure if you need to copy Absolver completely. Hover/amphibious ability is something you would never use so might as well just not bother with it.

      Could make use of Cybran T3 MAA ground weapon. Change it to some anti-shield rockets and get it to launch at 65-75 range with low arc like Hoplite.

      However what to do with aeon Absolver? Delete?

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: 👑THE KING of Seton's Clutch 2v2 66,6$ U4500

      @whendaybreaks said in 👑THE KING of Seton's Clutch 2v2 66,6$ U4500:

      Nomads balance exploits

      https://faforever.github.io/spooky-db/#/UEA0107,UEA0104,XNA0107,XNA0104

      Not intended. Speed differences will be fixed next weekend.

      posted in Tournaments
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Roll off time is indeterministic

      If you're taking a look at roll-off time and do some changes with it, could you also take code from EQ which turns unit inside the factory towards its current waypoint?

      For example: if you had factory send units to the right, you'll have unit get build towards right side. Currently if you change that direction to left, the unit would have to rotate on its spot itself freezing the construction. EQ changed that the way unit gets rotated instantly and can move right away.

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Torp bombers are too strong vs subs

      @nooby UEF and Cybran torp bombers drop their torps directly into the target. The time gap between torp entering the water and torp reaching its target is too small. Torp defence wouldnt have time to work regardless of faction.

      If that is the "solution" to addressed problem, than UEF and Cybran torp bombers would have to drop bombs some time before their targets and that way is much worse when the target is close to some land areas.

      Other case is torp defence: UEF and cybran torp defence would be much better at absorbing damage than aeon/sera. Torp defence is waaaay too different among the factions and that thing never took a good look in FAF.

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Roll off time is indeterministic

      @jip Ur awesome

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: Make repair cheaper

      To think of it, why do we still have 2 different upgrade mechanics to begin with?

      Factories and cybran shields use mechanic that was invented in FAF that takes total cost of next stage and applies a discount according to current cost of building. This allowed to get rid of such things as cheap rebuild and veterancy not taking full unit cost into account. For example currently Cybran ED5 shield costs 4.26k mass, but each stage costs 160m->300(460-160)m->800(1260-460)->1200(2460-1260)m->1000(4260-1260m). You dont build new structure from scratch, you just add more parts to existing structure so it is logical it costs less to upgrade rather than building new.

      Other factions' shields and mexes use old upgrade mechanic that uses full price of unit every time you start an upgrade. This ofc allows you to exploit self-destruction of t2 mex to reclaim 800 mass and build t3 mex. With new upgrade mechanic upgrade would cost 4600 mass and building from scratch would cost 4600+900+36=5536, making self-destruct almost never efficient.

      I remember talking about it to JaggedAppliance years ago. He said its weird to have two different mechanics. Years passed, nothing changed.

      I guess its easier to ignore the problem than solving it.

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen
    • RE: What would it take for Nomads to be FAF's 5th Faction?

      No point in balancing Nomads until models are finished and some units cut or replaced or reworked. Before that happens, all you can do is make things look less worse. Original team wanted to implement some really weird things in mod and some of them exist to these days.

      One thing is certain: mod needs thoughtful approach of "balance team" and "model team" to make things happen. The amount of work to make models of required quality is absurd. And FAF balance team wouldnt handle this job given how slowly they fix things in original game and how ugly they do their job. Quick example: loyalist missile redirection was fixed in EQ in 2016, now the question is the fix in the main game?

      In any case there is one major issue with mod: its intellectual property. It doesn't belong to FAF, it doesn't belong to Exotic's team, nor 2-3 teams before. It belongs to Brute51 and he set some restrictions on how we could change the mod. We certainly crossed the border a little and it cost us a shitstorm a couple times. I personally would scrap 1/4 of what people call "faction identity", but i was not allowed to do so. Orbital bombardment that was mentioned here is one of those things. However one thing is random russian noname doing small things and other is legal entity from Europe changing everything completely.

      My conclusion is FAF does not have resources to implement mod.

      This project was cool, but right now its barely living corpse or better say cadaver. When i first saw Sanctuary trailer I noticed familiar style, concepts and assets there. Why do you think EDA was the first faction you saw on screen? Fair to say Nomads will be finished. In other game...

      posted in Balance Discussion
      S
      SiwaonaDaphnewen