A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy
-
You told me to read properly but you missed out on multiple mentions that this is NOT about 1 destro vs 2 subs, it's about higher numbers, like 4 vs 8.
-
In which multiple cogent human beings temporarily lose awareness of the concept of scaling
-
@wikingest said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:
I just ran a fast sandbox, and it seems that they are broken again. 1 Sera destro barely wins against 2 subhunters, but in bigger groups they get wrecked by subhunters. Althought maybe less than in the past...
@FemtoZetta My first post. As you can see, it never was about only 1 destro vs 2 subs.
-
Well whatever then, seems this thread is a mess already anyway with like 3 different discussions at the same time.
-
@melanol
put 10 sera subs against 10 of any other faction. they lose, largely because they waste torp defense on the same torpedo. 1 on 1 its even, as number increase sera lose markedly. can confirm for cybran and uef, never tested aeon ill be honest -
This post is deleted! -
When you thought your post was not controversial but you come back to this comment section lol.
Also, back to main point, sera needs a torp relevant buff at at least one tech. I actually think its ok if sera destro sucks in mass if the t1 or t3 sub is actually good enough to compensate (which it currently is not).
-
Why in the world are you making 10 t1 subs anyway
-
@exselsior I think you are hitting on a good point, which is that t1 subs are generally minimally viable across the board in most cases. but regardless, I still hold that the sera t1 change would be beneficial for both faction diversity and balance.
-
Last time I tested torp defence I found it unreliable. Also not very efficacious due to the long reload time.
A general rebalance of torps and torp defence (including vs torp bombers) would be nice to see.
-
This post is deleted! -
The solution: torp defence on sera sonar.
