FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Matchmaker Pool Feedback Thread

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    240 Posts 63 Posters 98.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BanthaFodderB
      BanthaFodder
      last edited by

      Setons is the perfect 4v4 map.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • MoraxM
        Morax @kdrafa91
        last edited by

        @kdrafa91 said in Matchmaker Pool Feedback Thread:

        played 4v4
        Win
        Game was not rated: unknown result

        Is this normal on ladder?

        No, but this is also a thread about the maps used in the pools. I would recommend discussing this in the "I need help" forum (and its sub forums) or the #technical-help channels in the FAF discord:

        50f99bf4-d9bd-43e7-b672-f435a12c5cb9-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • TheVVheelboyT
          TheVVheelboy
          last edited by

          Addition of adaptive lone Eagle should be imo reconsidered by the TMM team due to bad texturing and terrain sculpting which doesn't allow players to tell what is a hill or not at first glance, instead requiring to zoom in close and even free-cam to find the reason why engineers aren't capable of reaching the reclaim and mexes. It literally costed me 2 idle engineers in the beginning of the game due to how poorly the elevation and impassable terrain is conveyed on this map which imo is inexcusable.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            Exselsior
            last edited by

            Yeah I played one game on there and my build on it got cancered thinking I could walk to the hydro behind me. Was a very gassed start because I couldn’t tell the terrain wasn’t passable. Maybe that’s a me problem though

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MoraxM
              Morax
              last edited by

              @E33144211332424 @Exselsior FYI:

              PNG image 8.png

              We will be removing it from future pools until the author updates the map.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • N
                Nooby
                last edited by

                The Bjarg map is not one i like, very misleading unreclaimable wrecks that should be removed from the map, or map removed from pool

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RoweyR
                  Rowey
                  last edited by

                  that's just part of the Maps aesthetics it take you 1 game to know that certain wreck arent reclaimable + if you just one quick Ctrl+shift you can clearly see that they have no mass value

                  "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" - Spock

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    Nooby
                    last edited by

                    No other map I have ever seen has this. It is just needless, unfriendly and unintuitive. Seems very silly to introduce this mechanic for a single map. The it takes 1 game argument does not hold up.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • MoraxM
                      Morax
                      last edited by

                      There was a large amount of feedback regarding visuals of the map being difficult to read as well, so it likely won’t be in folding pools until it is updated a bit.

                      I will mention this to the author as well.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • X
                        XerxesGRONDNoob
                        last edited by

                        I would enjoy a reduction of the percentage chance that I get a map gen pool map whilst searching in the competitive mode, I have been experiencing, through bad luck or whatever other factors are at play, 3/4 map gen matches in succession. Seems a bit much. I thank you all, much love

                        MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          Dukes
                          last edited by Dukes

                          Hi, was playing 2v2 ladder and got the map Xellaria. The map is way too dark to play on and is really difficult to see the terrain changes. Also with fog of war and radar pings it basically blends into the background, When the game ended and put us into obvs view it was actually a lot brighter and easier to see. any chance it could be made to that light level permanently

                          sorry, just seen the map is already being removed for next pool ect

                          MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • MoraxM
                            Morax @XerxesGRONDNoob
                            last edited by

                            @xerxesgrondnoob said in Matchmaker Pool Feedback Thread:

                            I would enjoy a reduction of the percentage chance that I get a map gen pool map whilst searching in the competitive mode, I have been experiencing, through bad luck or whatever other factors are at play, 3/4 map gen matches in succession. Seems a bit much. I thank you all, much love

                            So I have been playing ladder quite a bit recently and have not noticed this, myself. 3/4 matches sounds really, really high. Has this issue persisted for you?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MoraxM
                              Morax @Dukes
                              last edited by Morax

                              @dukes said in Matchmaker Pool Feedback Thread:

                              Hi, was playing 2v2 ladder and got the map Xellaria. The map is way too dark to play on and is really difficult to see the terrain changes. Also with fog of war and radar pings it basically blends into the background, When the game ended and put us into obvs view it was actually a lot brighter and easier to see. any chance it could be made to that light level permanently

                              sorry, just seen the map is already being removed for next pool ect

                              UPDATE: When was this map in the pool? I do not see it in any pool within the past few months??

                              Just checked and yes: it is absolutely awful to look at the very dark textures... I will make a note to the team and reduce its aesthetic score until addressed so it does not show up again.

                              Thank you for your report.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Plasma_WolfP
                                Plasma_Wolf
                                last edited by

                                Just had a game on Moonlight swamps. Very dark texture, so it's impossible to see the height differences, and also that there's a lake in the middle. Checked the reclaim, which is imbalanced under water, and also not symmetrical on land.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • S
                                  snoog
                                  last edited by

                                  How often is the maplist changed? I've noticed a lot of variety lately, including quite a few maps I've never even seen before like Adaptive Fate and Adaptive Sin. Also Salem Bay is pretty neat, wish that came up more.

                                  That said, I had a match on Re Requisite FAF Version and honestly wouldn't mind never seeing that map again. Way too much for a 4v4 and way too much empty space. Such a slow and boring map.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Plasma_WolfP
                                    Plasma_Wolf
                                    last edited by

                                    I thought the map list for 4v4 had 15x15 maps for the generated map? I just got a full-on 20x20 map (Corner spawns). Are there weird settings for the map generator? The map I got was on neroxis_map_generator_1.8.5_zsjc2pa7g4kpm_baia

                                    Coincidentally, I never want to see a 20x20 corner-to-corner map again 😞

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • H
                                      HerpesHank
                                      last edited by HerpesHank

                                      i can attest to not being able to easily tell moonlight swamps had a lake in the center, i know its kind of in the name but it doesnt look like one.

                                      has there been any conversation about a veto system? i know there are maps in every pool that people dislike. cant avoid them forever but i think a properly implemented system would help mix up the variety a bit, especially in 4v4 where the <500 rating maps are more likely to be selected in the 0-1000 brackets.

                                      sidenote; i didnt see pina coladas in the june 4v4 map pool post, but when i logged in and looked at the map pool it was there. was kind of annoying when i was hoping that map would be pulled this month. im sure its a great map with plenty of options at higher ratings, but <1000 its nightmare.

                                      thank you to the matchmaking team, i deeply appreciate the efforts made into making this all work. been enjoying learning a game i never bothered to learn. just wish it was more populated so us americans didnt have to be up so early for some TMM games. looking forward to future adjustments.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • FtXCommandoF
                                        FtXCommando
                                        last edited by FtXCommando

                                        Been conversations about vetos since 2014. Pina Coladas is trash at high level, I thought it was there for new players 4head.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • H
                                          HerpesHank
                                          last edited by

                                          hopefully vetos can find its way in at some point. i cant fucking stand pina coladas as an ~800 4v4 player.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Plasma_WolfP
                                            Plasma_Wolf
                                            last edited by Plasma_Wolf

                                            In the 2v2 pool, Therum is way too dark to see.

                                            I've enjoyed 5v5 Pina Coladas but 4v4 is horrible. If the opposing team's player knows how to play when he doesn't have an opponent in his channel, and your team's player doesn't, the game's over at the start.

                                            Edit: Phenom Spartiate is imbalanced with the mexes. There is one mex that is not placed symmetrically (might be more, but this one can be noticed right away).
                                            Left, just above the line of water, vs right, just below the line of water. The one on the right side is placed closer to the water and can't be built because the hill is too steep.

                                            Overall, Phenom Spartitate is not symmetrical in the textures, so it's very difficult to judge if the mexes are placed symmetrically, but I've got the impression they're bad.

                                            (The mex icons are also not aligned to the build grid, but this is just visual)

                                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post