Are walled T1 PD useless now?

I looked at the sheets and while the data is useful, they don't mention how exactly the tests were perfomed. That does seem to matter here though.

If my findings from the last post are correct, you'd always want to fight against pds on flat maps from as far away as possible, e.g. via using attack move, as walls only black shots from up close

The tests were performed on flat ground using an attack order targetting the PDs so the shots can be blocked by walls from far away.

While I have found angles where a wall on flat ground can block a tank shot fired from a distance, at least in my testing those are very rare.

Compare this test, where not one tank shot got blocked by a wall:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y60-_oqdyFk

or this one, where I drive around the pd in different distances:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03kWKjv8gxk

Note that in the latter test, some shots from far away are blocked by a wall, depending on the shooting angle. The vast majority are not though, unless you drive in closer, when all shots are blocked.

My only explanation is that we must be doing something slightly different afterall. I don't know what though. Ideas:

• Is "flat" ground not actually flat?
• Do tanks, or their turrets, sometimes spawn very slightly higher or lower?
• Has there been some, ostensibly, unrelated change somewhere else in the code that changed the tank-wall interaction?

I used Flat 1 mex map and it is flat
They shouldn't
Not that I am aware of, the only changes that were made to either tank or PD or wall files were the ones I made.

It was never consistent before and it still isn't consistent now. At least now it is equally inconsistent across factions. Mass cost and buildtime are pretty negligible for normal amounts of PD so you should still build them.

What's the aim here? Do we want walled PD which block all T1 tank shots or which are slightly porous (to a random degree). Has anyone looked at hit boxes of walls as well as PD?

Yes it was looked at thoroughly and the desired outcome is close to the one we have right now, the Walls block some but not all shots, and all of the PDs behave (roughly) in the same way.

@tagada

I can't ever recall Cybran/UEF walled PD templates ever acting like this, if this is what the PD are being normalized to. It seems like at max range the walls block absolutely 0% of shots, not some percentage.

If game calculates shell mouvement useing ballistic trajectory, or something similar. Then there are some logic in fact that shells/projectiles coming from far away get better over walls. Coming from far, shells draw much higher "arc", and at the moment of impact they are descending much more than when fired from close, with smaller "arc" and less drop.

Drawing higher wall (hitbox) should block all shots. Eventually, after that, drawin narrower/irregular wall (hitbox), with "openings" in wall/between walls, could allow some of shots from different distances to pass. Maybe.

Not saying that it is better in one or other way.

Even though the behavior of walls on flat ground is indeed weird, I'm not sure if we want to change any wall or pd hitboxes.

The reason is quite simple: As Tagada correctly states, on most maps walls do their job very well now.
I haven't tested them all, but It's only only the perfectly flat maps that the weird behavior of highly deterministic, range dependent behavior seems to take place.

Super flat maps are really artificial anyway, so I'm not sure if it's a problem that the wall+pd behavior is also weird.

@tagada thanks for taking the time to respond. And CheeseBerry for the testing!

@zeldafanboy You don't recall it since you didn't make proper tests before and in-game the ground is nearly never flat. Unless somehow the behavior got changed even though there were 0 changes made to the files then I see 0 chance of the behavior being different pre and post-patch.

Has it been considered to make the wall hitbox much taller so it blocks 100% direct shots and 0% arty shots ?
And to compensate, have their HP reduced for example ?

Or is it out of the question cause that would allow t2 pd to be walled, and other unwanted side effects ?

@tagada

Well I was under the impression that “perfectly flat” was more common in maps than it actually is— I.e. I thought that the sides of Open Palms or most of Gap of Rohan were “perfectly flat” but apparently this is not the case. If this weird behavior is only apparent on something like Crazy Rush then whatever

played baadlands against UEF and my loyas were not hitting t1 uef pd with 4 walls