Game-enders are generally almost never built, even in large 6v6 or 7v7 team matches. On Mapgen, even when the total mass income per team is 1,500–2,000, players prefer to build EXP or T3 artillery. If we make game-enders even more expensive, they’ll only continue to be built on dual gaps. Let’s not remove 5 buildings from the game.

@hybrid_ In my opinion, this will greatly devalue the victory in this tournament. For example, if you compare with this tournament where there were only 5 teams, but they gave out unique avatars. https://forum.faforever.com/topic/8336/setons-clutch-tourney-2024 or this 2x2 tournament with only 6 teams https://challonge.com/ru/zb2sb4m

If you think it's right to give out "King of Seton" avatars only for the tournament of the same name. Then it would be just as correct to take the avatar "King of Seton" from the past winners of the tournament. Just like the avatar u1900 champion is taken away after a new tournament.

You can give the winners of this tournament at least the old avatars of the "King of Seton", which are less beautiful. Or be consistent and take the "King of Seton" avatar from everyone except the winners of the last "King of Seton" tournament

@NOC Can you provide statistics to confirm your words? Or proof of the involvement of specific people in DDOS attacks? How many games have you played over the past year to draw such conclusions about the players of the ru community?

And I'd also like to discuss custom maps for 3x3
I often hear the opinion that we have very few custom maps for 3x3
Here is a pool of maps for 4x4

Close 1 more slot and any of these maps can be played 3x3 and it will be a good game

@Nuggets Bad is bad. It wasn't my goal to offer an alternative balance for each point. I've gathered the opinions of different pro players. Most people think it's better not to change snipers and sacu at all than to change it like that. Because it will destroy the balance at the t3 stage.

The other proposed changes are interesting and no one objects to them.