@LoliChan said in MapGen 1x1 Tournament:

@TheWeakie I changed my choice (hybrid explained to me that the rating distribution is better) Therefore, the players will be distributed according to the rating.

Distribution according to the rating can mean multiple different methods. Which one?

For a shielded units there is a special icon when the shield is manually disabled.

I wish a mod that add a special "reload" icon when shield is recharging (after losing all its hp)

@Swatoslav team?

@waffelzNoob I'm pretty sure 1v1 is more popular than 2v2. 1v1 is also super distinct, I absolutely agree it has a lot of value

@IndexLibrorum I made it up Roughly from my experience

There are 2v2, 3v3 and 4v4 team match making. They all are pretty similar - automatically created team games. Currently they all have separate rankings.

In TMM more than 90% games are played in 3v3, rougly 8% in 4v4 and less than 2% in 2v2. Thus 2v2 and 4v4 rankings does not represent any value. There are numerous examples of people actively searching all tmm options, getting only 3v3 team games and being unable to calibrate their 2v2/4v4 rankings.

Since it's very rare to find and 2v2 & 4v4 game, those rankings do not represent any value. They are not realistically achievable and are not correct. The mere calibrating to get gold or diamond badge can take up more time searching in queue than in game.

Rankings would be more accurate and less streched out if all TMM games (except 1v1 ladder) had unified ranking. When players have the same ranking in 2v2, 3v3 and 4v4, whichever they find first.

I would not even be so sure that last 25 games were actually rated. It’s not specified. Could as well be 6 players survival.

That’s the general problem which was brought up on many occasions inside faf statistics megathreads for example. Most raw data is meaningless until you apply a multiple filters to it. But if it was, the result of additional work would likely far exceed quick forum reply format

@Evan_ said in AEONS are GARBAGE!:

In fact if you use up the hp on your shield it will recharge to 8k hp in 75 seconds which is over 100 hp per second. That is much more effective hp and regen than Seraphim's nano, which by the way is more expensive.

It’s incorrect approach. You may get 100 hp/s while recharging, but you don’t get it while not recharging. Meanwhile regen upgrade works all the time. You cannot compare them this way.

It also works other way around. Lower CPU rating = better CPU

Sign up Sainse 1620 (4v4)

@ZLO said in Possible to pull players’ APM from replays?:

https://fafafaf.github.io/
However you need to remember that numbers are pulled from the amount of commands that player makes. So afaik shift+clicking units in factory will give 5 commands

@ZLO fafafaf gives inflated numbers compared to Kazbek faf analytics, faf analytics counted all commands in a single tick as one command (which is realistic, no one really gives 2 different commands in 0.05 seconds)

@xclkvnspoijfoisn said in 15minutes of gaming?:

@Sainse said in 15minutes of gaming?:

long dynamic games are the best.

That makes no sense. And you too fail to see the larger point.
Long game does not = turtle game.

Well you failed to see a basic point that I didn't claim "Long game does not = turtle game", I even directly stated "long dynamic game" is a thing. My point was that dynamic games tend to end faster, so most of them is relatively short as a result.

You could just read other people's messages carefully before claiming they fail to see something

Wrong dychotomy. It's not "t1 gameplay vs t1/t2/t3/t4 gameplay". It's "turtle gameplay vs dynamic gameplay". Dynamic games generally don't last as long cause any mistake gets punished immediately, so games tend to be shorter. But long dynamic games are the best.

The way to make it less abusable potentially is to make the pause on per-team voting. Like recall. But in this case "force pause".

The other problem it would introduce is in this case the whole team shouldn't make any orders on pause, which is not realistic and would interfere with the game rules about game advantage

@Nuggets "don't pause the game to get game advantage" is already bannable

I wish a mod that allows for hotkeys to choose:

• Nearest transport (empty)
• Nearest transport (with any number units on the board)
• Iterate though units in the transport, i.e. choose the first one in the transport, the second one and so on. Without needing do to it with the mouse for multiple drops like now

Rule update.

In order to provide more equal opportunities for both teams:

Map pick rules for Bo3 (and only Bo3)

• "Lower rated captain picks first map, highest rated second map. After that the team who lost 2nd game choses 3rd map"

Map pick rules for Bo3 (and only Bo5):

For Bo5 the rule is still the same as before:

• "For every game the lower rated captain picks the first map (and then alternating) which cannot be used again. There are no Vetoes"

@Caliber it’s not, it just takes ages to be done

@Kilatamoro Italian accent may less funny than German but that nowhere near to be called abysmal