mass storage.
-
@SainseRow without storages there were 6, with storages 9.
now there will be 9 without storages. so what? )) -
@FreadyFish I consider these actions pointless.
-
They do have a purpose - they're easy to snipe. They're simple targets that cost a lot, take a long time to return of investment and they have low health. Good candidates to punish your enemy severely with just a few (tech 1) bombers.
You also do not have to click that much, there are in-game options to make capping an extractor a side effect of assisting/upgrading it. If you do not want that side effect, you can also use context based templates. In combination with a recent assembly patch by @Ctrl-K the templates even snap to extractor build sites.
-
If you want a simpler economy, play Supcom 2. There’s a reason we’re here and not playing that game. Getting rid of mass storages is game breaking. If you want games like this on FAF then that’s a sim mod and not a change to the core game.
-
im with that guy
-
-
@Jip just shoot at the mines. ))
I don't think that in reality your action is used. unless by complete nerds.
but there won't be any popularity if you make a game only for these people. -
@Exselsior without storages there were 6, with storages 9.
now there will be 9 without storages. so what? )) -
Yeah let's remove them, so, you can't raid them or lose due to tmls. Make mass infinite per player making only your skill to decide the game, but random mine loss
-
Dude is commenting on a forum for an rts game from 2007 and calling other people nerds. Nice
-
@Ctrl-K This is too much. You need to keep yourself within limits. )))))
-
@Exselsior I don't do any training.)) I just follow the game. Because of the nostalgia for Total Annihilation.
-
Hello.
I propose to remove the factory producer and inclination to consummate the unit.
This is not a secret and everyone does it. Therefore, it does not affect the game at all.
It only forces you to click more and pay attention to useless actions.
There will be no need to write and maintain scripts for consummation. The code will become simpler.You just need to increase the cost of the units and make engie consummate unit. And that's it.
I hope at least this proposal will pass.
-
I suggest we all go back to playing Pong, it's much simpler and doesn't confuse the masses.
-
@FtXCommando Excuse me. How old are you?
-
How does this thread exist?
-
Hello.
I propose to remove the game.
This is not a secret and everyone plays it. Therefore, it is not needed at all.
It only forces you to play for no good reason at all.
There will be no need to write and maintain any code. You can just remove it all.I hope at least this proposal will pass.
-
they also make,- we call them mines now- a more valuable target( like jip explained), even more in a highly dense mine cluster, also destroying storage will remove all the mass in it i think, which can be pretty crucial when you want to pump a t4 trough. its also part of the game tactics, bcs your base gets more complex and you have more to loose. the potential complexity of your main and side bases matter, bcs you need to think about your resource allocation and how much you may invest into defending it. they diversify your mass infrastructure and bring tactical depth to the game. the auto ring for the t2 upgrade is already pretty convenient.
-
@Conny_Action There is no point in accumulating resources.
It is possible to make the mine itself store resources. -
Why even generate ressources at all? Cant we just like.. get the units?? Why manage eco aswell?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login