Hey guys i dont like these changes

Thank you for making tournaments for lower rated players

some of those colors are too good to not add, add new colors i think its great

Hello everyone,

I’d like to propose the creation of an Oversight and Review Committee—a community-run body designed to provide independent oversight of the moderation team, and potentially other decision-making branches of the platform, if necessary.

The Problem:
Right now, there is no real way for community members to challenge or review moderation decisions, especially by anyone outside of the moderation team itself. This creates a closed system where actions, even if potentially unreasonable or inconsistent, go unchecked.

Without an independent mechanism for feedback or accountability, we risk eroding trust and alienating members who feel decisions are unfair or opaque.

The Solution: An Oversight and Review Committee
The Oversight and Review Committee would not act as a second layer of moderation, nor would it get involved in day-to-day enforcement. Instead, it would function as a periodic review panel that meets at set intervals (e.g., quarterly) to:

• Review accumulated concerns from the community

• Analyze larger trends or patterns in moderation actions

• Discuss major incidents that may indicate deeper issues

• Provide recommendations on improvements to transparency, communication, and fairness

This would create a constructive feedback loop rather than an adversarial relationship between moderators and the community.

Core Objectives of the Oversight and Review Committee:
Oversight & Evaluation: Look into recurring concerns or high-impact actions taken by moderation.

• Balance & Accountability: Offer checks on decision-making power without interfering in active moderation.

• Community Advocacy: Provide a structured way for community voices to be heard and reflected in governance.

• Policy Feedback: Suggest changes to moderation practices or guidelines based on observed patterns.

• Clarifying the Role:
  The committee would not handle appeals or individual cases.

It would meet infrequently and intentionally, focusing only on larger issues or repeated complaints.
Its role is to identify and address systemic concerns, not to undermine the moderation team’s authority.

Benefits of This Structure:
Builds Trust: By showing that moderation is open to oversight and reflection, we reinforce faith in the system.

Encourages Accountability: Encourages moderators and admins to act with consistency and clarity, knowing there’s an external lens on major actions.

• Fosters Community Involvement: Allows the broader community to have a voice in how the space is governed.

• Improves Transparency: Even just the existence of the ORC can lead to clearer processes and communication.

Call to Action:
Let’s open the floor for feedback:

Would an Oversight and Review Committee be a valuable addition to our community structure?

How should members of such a group be selected?

What responsibilities and limitations should they have?

This proposal isn’t about creating conflict—it’s about making sure the structures we rely on to guide the community are fair, transparent, and accountable. Let’s work together to make this happen.

I’ll be honest—I’m not 100% sure yet how the selection process for members should look (probably an election by association and is must be able a subject of change), but from here on out, I’m open to suggestions and ideas from anyone who wants to help shape this constructively.

Consider this post to be part one—a starting point for what will hopefully become a more structured and practical addition to our community governance. Let’s build this together.

Please provide feedback to this idea

that is awesome, as the clan lead i approve of the challenge

is it too late to sign up? TTDeli/ AngryDeli 1500 global

new players will rise, old players will go, cycle of life bro
Money will never be a solid motivator

Nuggets + Deli signing up 2k + 1,6k

Can we get statistics for ban amount, appeal and successrate of the appeal?

Sign me up chief, 1800

Deli here, signing out

@Swatoslav you mean sweatoslav and ikigamer eksddddddddd

Can we get statistics for ban amount, appeal and successrate of the appeal?

that is awesome, as the clan lead i approve of the challenge

@fedorafreak Dont sign this guy up

sing up, 2200 or so

Hello everyone,

I’d like to propose the creation of an Oversight and Review Committee—a community-run body designed to provide independent oversight of the moderation team, and potentially other decision-making branches of the platform, if necessary.

The Problem:
Right now, there is no real way for community members to challenge or review moderation decisions, especially by anyone outside of the moderation team itself. This creates a closed system where actions, even if potentially unreasonable or inconsistent, go unchecked.

Without an independent mechanism for feedback or accountability, we risk eroding trust and alienating members who feel decisions are unfair or opaque.

The Solution: An Oversight and Review Committee
The Oversight and Review Committee would not act as a second layer of moderation, nor would it get involved in day-to-day enforcement. Instead, it would function as a periodic review panel that meets at set intervals (e.g., quarterly) to:

• Review accumulated concerns from the community

• Analyze larger trends or patterns in moderation actions

• Discuss major incidents that may indicate deeper issues

• Provide recommendations on improvements to transparency, communication, and fairness

This would create a constructive feedback loop rather than an adversarial relationship between moderators and the community.

Core Objectives of the Oversight and Review Committee:
Oversight & Evaluation: Look into recurring concerns or high-impact actions taken by moderation.

• Balance & Accountability: Offer checks on decision-making power without interfering in active moderation.

• Community Advocacy: Provide a structured way for community voices to be heard and reflected in governance.

• Policy Feedback: Suggest changes to moderation practices or guidelines based on observed patterns.

• Clarifying the Role:
  The committee would not handle appeals or individual cases.

It would meet infrequently and intentionally, focusing only on larger issues or repeated complaints.
Its role is to identify and address systemic concerns, not to undermine the moderation team’s authority.

Benefits of This Structure:
Builds Trust: By showing that moderation is open to oversight and reflection, we reinforce faith in the system.

Encourages Accountability: Encourages moderators and admins to act with consistency and clarity, knowing there’s an external lens on major actions.

• Fosters Community Involvement: Allows the broader community to have a voice in how the space is governed.

• Improves Transparency: Even just the existence of the ORC can lead to clearer processes and communication.

Call to Action:
Let’s open the floor for feedback:

Would an Oversight and Review Committee be a valuable addition to our community structure?

How should members of such a group be selected?

What responsibilities and limitations should they have?

This proposal isn’t about creating conflict—it’s about making sure the structures we rely on to guide the community are fair, transparent, and accountable. Let’s work together to make this happen.

I’ll be honest—I’m not 100% sure yet how the selection process for members should look (probably an election by association and is must be able a subject of change), but from here on out, I’m open to suggestions and ideas from anyone who wants to help shape this constructively.

Consider this post to be part one—a starting point for what will hopefully become a more structured and practical addition to our community governance. Let’s build this together.

Please provide feedback to this idea

finally, sign me up boss

i sign up 2042

im with that guy