@jip said in 4v4 map list:
@noonecares said in 4v4 map list:
Looks like council or association once again hiding shit happening to faf.
We hid it in this forum post.
At least Mozart felt like he had to remove his maps because of this change. We, as the vault team, think it is wrong for a map author to be able to leverage the rating system to force a player to play some version of a map. Best to read the topic.
I suspect Chosen did it for the same reason.
Biass removed his maps for other reasons - I'm sure that is somewhere publicly available too.
This is not the whole story: we also had an incident where someone on the matchmaker team used and older version of a map because they saw it as "the better version." To the map-maker, this was not communicated and they felt like it should have been. It turned out that the map-maker DID NOT like this and it became a bit of a hectic thing.
Was the matchmaker team wrong in doing this? Not necessarily, although I think some communication beforehand should have been conducted.
To me, we have so little talent in good map-making that a better set of discussions should have been made, and the result is now the loss of a lot of content.
@NoOneCares that is my 2 cents. Others disagree with me but I think more communication would have been better.
There is more to the events that led up to this with Chosen's maps along some other authors not mentioned. My message to the community is this: please respect those who work on this project, keep in mind it is not paid for in any way, and we will flourish.