You guys just don't understand Aeon. It's not about killing the enemy commander. The Princess can only be appeased by stealing trees.
TREES FOR THE TREE GOD!
You guys just don't understand Aeon. It's not about killing the enemy commander. The Princess can only be appeased by stealing trees.
TREES FOR THE TREE GOD!
You must deceive the enemy, sometimes your allies, but you must always deceive yourself!
Tried looking into this, see also: https://github.com/FAForever/fa/pull/4218
It appears there are two solutions that are viable:
If you bet for option (2) then chances are it remains like this forever (pun intended). Option (1) can be done right away with the next balance patch. I highly encourage option (1) for the sake of consistency - it is a nice idea, but if it doesn't work then you've got to adapt.
A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned
@jip My main is Aeon and I vote to remove it. We can come up with a proper fix later, if ever.
@jip Wtf ? there is absolutely no sense to remove the cools features from Aeon units like this one.
If a feature breaks what a player expects then it isn't a feature - then it is broken.
A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned
@jip Removing one of the coolest thing of the Aeon just for the ai, I don't understand the point it makes no sense to me
This isn't about an AI, it is about unit behavior.
A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned
@Jip So if it is about units behavior it is even crazier like Aeon is the micro faction like u have to baby sit all your units (aurora, harbs, snipers, shields ans aa), i would just say skill issues if u wanna remove this for that reason
You can't answer 'skill issue' to 'inconsistent game design', it is not one of the options. Units need to behave as you expect them to. If they don't, then you need to fix that. One solution is removing the ability.
A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned
@jip Removing feature of a game??? Like it makes no sense to remove a thing which works as intended for skill issues problem like u attack move to reclaim and move order to fight, your point makes no sense
@jip Also a third option - increase the build rate of harbs so having them reclaiming is more likely to be useful (and less of an issue/delay when done by accident)
M27AI and M28AI developer; Devlogs and more general AI development guide:
https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v71-devlog
https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v87
@arma473 said in Can we fix harbingers?:
Could we add a toggle button with two states:
on: "while this unit is on patrol/attack move, it will consider reclaim/assist/repair"
off: "while this unit is on patrol/attack move, it will not reclaim/assist/repair"
Is something like this not possible? @Jip
like the reclaim ability / buildpower being toggleable like salems amphibious?
@Jip off the top of your head, do you think this could be solved by giving them a toggle button for their engineering capabilities? Like how movement for the Salem was solved.
Perhaps a little depth could be added by having the toggle just be the shields. They can't engineer while shields are up, but maybe boost them to 10 build power, just under t2.
You must deceive the enemy, sometimes your allies, but you must always deceive yourself!