Tactic for Dual Gap with 100% win rate (for 1-3 players)
-
I like it and should spice things up, however it is like with the early nuke rush and any other rush tactic - If the enemy is not brain-dead he will send a scout early, will see what you are going to do and tries to counter it.
-
@zokora I thought about that, but seems like this is not correct.
For Nuke-rush, yes. If you scouted that, just go in and destroy the silo.But for this tactic, even if enemy scouted it and know what we are going to do, they should perform quite a complex sequence of actions.
-
All 6 players should build shields and T2 AA Turrets. If only some players will build shield, bombers just will attack other players, who didn't built shield.
Furthermore, amount of shields and turrets should be "enough". 1 shield + 2 AA turret will not be enough to protect the base against 16 bombers. -
One, or even two air players should start to build T1 interceptors in large quantities, probably without upgrade MEX to T2, because 20 T1 interceptors will not be able to stop bombers run, because T2 planes also quite a string air-to-air fighters.
-
Even if all players have shields and AA turrets + bunch of T1 interceptors. Bombers may attack enemy fleet and shipyards, that will open a gate for allied navy which will enter a river and will be able to destroy shields and shot down enemy T1 planes.
Of course this tactics can be countered, it just seems too complex to perform, because coordination of 2 players should be countered with coordination of 2 other players.
-
-
If your opponent plays reactively and scouts an early t2 seraphim air factory then the only response is to spam interceptors. I don't think this particular tactic will work on games with higher rated players - Notha's are still very brutal on Dual Gap
. -
Just make Janus instead of Nothas, will become a way better strat. Also as players already mentioned, this only works if the enemy players can't scout or adapt and will instead just follow their own plan/BO no matter what their enemy does.
-
Just make Janus instead of Nothas, will become a way better strat
Visually I like Janus much more than Notha, also it have cool transformer wings, but unfortunately Janus have very low damage on small targets.
Single bomb of Notha will cause 1250 dmg to each MEX. While single run of Janus will cause approximately 500-800 damage to each MEX.Seems like the only advantage of Janus over Notha - it is a good performance against T1 spam of ground units.
-
@jip Yeah, that should work. However allied cruiser and strong anti air capabilities of Nothas, still a strong things.
I want to play against high-ranked players to figure it out. -
@Artaani Your goal should probably be to kill pgens not mexes...
-
@archsimkat Thought about that, but I tested "how much time is needed to rebuild lost buildings" and turned out that it is required 5 minutes to rebuild MEX-es and only 2 minutes to rebuild generators.
This is due the fact that generators repay its investments much faster than MEX-es.
-
Not having e lowers your mass and e income.
-
@archsimkat It´s dual gap you kinda always get E overflow from team
-
Well, when enemy team doesn't scout, any coordinated strategy works.
@kdrafa91 said in Tactic for Dual Gap with 100% win rate (for 1-3 players):
@archsimkat It´s dual gap you kinda always get E overflow from team
At 600-1000 rank, people cluster T1 pgens around E storage and Hydro; one bombers kills all. Removing almost all T2 pgens at same time will cripple team power output.
-
@jcvjcvjcvjcv If there´s overflow then the dude just pick his engies and starts spaming AA and you are fucked
I´ve seen two replays and when he goes for the mexes he usually gets almost all engies cause the engies are clustered arround the mexes upgrading and ringing, so he also strikes both the buildpower and mexes. People go to 1 mass income in a flash (and RIP Engies.
Also for what i´ve seen from the quick look i took he goes for other important buildings after, not only the mexes.
-
Nice strategy!
On Dual Gap, most any reasonable strategy with a coordinated team can win against a passive team. My point is part of your success is just using team tactics.
I'll see games where a high rated player joins and strat or nuke rushes, only lose because nobody follows through.. the opponent team just rebuilds.
-
1 t1 scout, at the beginning of the game, sees the Serafim t1 plant. Then, in the fog of war, it gets darker at 6 minutes. A person with a brain will make (without air plan,and anti-strat) 2 shields and 1 t2 anti-aircraft guns, or 4 t1 at different distances covering 4x4vs2. This meta consists only in the weak intellect of the players playing there, and they are not able to put up a T2 shield by requesting from those who have technology, or 10 interceptors to kill notes, at a distance due to reconnoitered notes without blocking the enemy or the existing radar around the perimeter. With all this, the responsibility completely weighs in the air, if a person cannot make 15 interceptors and knock down notes, and then realize the full advantage of the left reclaim and the dominance of the economy due to the T3 strat, then you are clearly playing at the level of normal AI.
-
@zxccursed Of course it can be countered, this is not imbalance tactic.
I just pointed at the fact, that it works for majority of games on Dual Gap.
