FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login
    The current pre-release of the client ("pioneer" in the version) is only compatible to itself. So you can only play with other testers. Please be aware!

    Optional Split Teams Option for TMM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    14 Posts 5 Posters 279 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      Firv @maudlin27
      last edited by

      @maudlin27 said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

      I quite like the idea, but my main concern would be the potential for abuse that would be hard to detect (e.g. you're on VC with your group, and one of you gets put on the enemy team, and decides to feed your group info)

      you can already do this right now just by queueing up as two seperate groups. So this change would not change anything for that regard

      maudlin27M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • N Offline
        Nuggets FAF Association Board @maudlin27
        last edited by

        @maudlin27 said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

        I quite like the idea, but my main concern would be the potential for abuse that would be hard to detect (e.g. you're on VC with your group, and one of you gets put on the enemy team, and decides to feed your group info)

        I see the argument but this "abuse" would mean no more faf stream is allowed as the enemy can spectate! Also no joining voice if your friend is in the opponent team?
        Basically completely irrelevant as this isn't something you can prevent.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • maudlin27M Offline
          maudlin27 @Firv
          last edited by

          @Firv said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

          you can already do this right now just by queueing up as two seperate groups. So this change would not change anything for that regard

          To not change anything means assuming the two separate groups will always be assigned to the same game which won't always be the case. The change would make things much easier and more reliable for someone seeking to do this. Whether that makes it a big enough issue to outweigh the benefits I dont know, but it clearly makes it easier and increases the risk of such behaviour.

          M27AI and M28AI developer:
          https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v81-devlog
          https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v294
          M28 trophy holders: Radde, Yew (Radde trophy, v285) and Zwaffel (Sladow trophy, v284)

          S F 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            Sainse Balance Team @maudlin27
            last edited by Sainse

            Very good idea by Strife. Upvote guys

            @maudlin27 said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

            The change would make things much easier and more reliable for someone seeking to do this.

            It won’t make it much easier. You underestimate how easy it already is lol. Just alt f4 whenever one group found game but other didn’t. Abuser also doesn’t need to “feed group info”, he can just intentionally lose and it’s game over

            maudlin27M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F Offline
              Firv @maudlin27
              last edited by

              @maudlin27 said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

              @Firv said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

              you can already do this right now just by queueing up as two seperate groups. So this change would not change anything for that regard

              To not change anything means assuming the two separate groups will always be assigned to the same game which won't always be the case. The change would make things much easier and more reliable for someone seeking to do this. Whether that makes it a big enough issue to outweigh the benefits I dont know, but it clearly makes it easier and increases the risk of such behaviour.

              you underestimate the player pool. When i queue up 4 with people we often do groups of 2. 9 out of 10 times we get a match against each other

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • maudlin27M Offline
                maudlin27 @Sainse
                last edited by maudlin27

                @Sainse said in Optional Split Teams Option for TMM:

                It won’t make it much easier. You underestimate how easy it already is lol. Just alt f4 whenever one group found game but other didn’t. Abuser also doesn’t need to “feed group info”, he can just intentionally lose and it’s game over

                Both of which would be more detectable, and are bannable

                M27AI and M28AI developer:
                https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v81-devlog
                https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v294
                M28 trophy holders: Radde, Yew (Radde trophy, v285) and Zwaffel (Sladow trophy, v284)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N Offline
                  Nuggets FAF Association Board
                  last edited by Nuggets

                  And this is also irrelevant to the topic. Everything has exploits, this is literally no different from hosting a global lobby. I dont see how there is an argument against this feature unless its a technical limitation

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    Strife
                    last edited by Strife

                    I think the main argument against split teams is an emotional one, that it makes TMM feel less like a "ranked game" and more like a custom game.

                    However, it may be one of the few, ways to significantly reduce waiting times without sacrificing game quality. Especially because players are likely to queue together with people of a similar rank.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N Offline
                      Nuggets FAF Association Board
                      last edited by

                      I think in reality it just means you wont queue with your buddy and instead say "lets queue at the same time" and then you have the chance of only you or him finding a game and the other has to wait

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F Offline
                        Firv
                        last edited by

                        it would be amazing if i could just queue up wiht 4 friends and we get either a 3 v 3 with an other rando or a 4 v 4 with 3 randoms. Now we queue up as a group of 3 and a group of 2 and sometimes only 1 group gets a game and the other are just stuck there waiting

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • S Offline
                          Sainse Balance Team @Strife
                          last edited by

                          @Strife custom games can be ranked as well, idk what you’re saying

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          • First post
                            Last post