Nucleus genius and ddos of FAF. (ru original is below)

@cocucka said in Nucleus genius and ddos of FAF. (ru original is below):

@spikeynoob So why didnt u just rename him to e.g. player54861354 instead of ban?

solid idea.
But then he would not be able to log in cause he does now know his login now...
And if he can't log in then he can't see the message from moderator
Unless we gonna start using e-mail for our login

(i mean, yes it would work if you told him his new login... but it only works on case-to-case basis, and i am pretty sure nobody wants that, i really want just a standard procedure to avoid any bias or responsibility or accusations or mistakes or avoid me thinking about it instead of doing moderator stuff)

Also they would be stuck with the random name for 30 days if they had changed it recently.

Locking this as quality of discussion not exactly high nor productive, and as discussing moderation actions in public is not allowed (as we can see how well this thread is already doing). From the thread author hoping for someone to die of an illness is just over the line.

To briefly comment the first post, the moderation team is a team, actions are more often than not discussed as a team and thus taken as a team. Furthermore the appeal system is in place where you can get the team lead and moderation team to review any bans if you feel you've been mistreated contrary to the community rules and policies in place.

In this particular case the ban history does not consist solely of one moderator's actions, and the perma ban resulted eventually from repeatable (and unchanged) bad behavior and other offenses where many other community members have been affected. If anything I'd say FAF moderation is quite lenient and gives multiple chances for users to improve upon their behavior, perma bans are the last resort.