FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    18 Posts 10 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ThomasHiattT
      ThomasHiatt
      last edited by

      Nobody can tell you why GPG made the balance and game design decisions that they did. The FAF community has rationalized the lack of RAS SACUs in a number of ways that have already been mentioned in this thread.

      QuietJoyQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • maudlin27M
        maudlin27 @QuietJoy
        last edited by

        @scout_more_often You misunderstood me-you can eco by just building sera sacus with no mass fabs. IIRC its something like half as efficient as a RAS sacu but more than twice the combat effectiveness, when adjusting for build cost.

        M27AI and M28AI developer; Devlogs and more general AI development guide:
        https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v71-devlog
        https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v150

        QuietJoyQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • QuietJoyQ
          QuietJoy @FtXCommando
          last edited by

          @ftxcommando said in Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?:

          You said you can’t play teamgames with your favorite faction because you don’t have ras boys. This implies that you need them to win. This resulted in the reaction you got.

          Sera doesn’t get ras boys cuz they got a ton of diverse combat boys.

          I don't need them to win. I personally would like them in my arsenal as an option to help me win should i decide to utilise them.

          So the balance team decided to buff the Sacu combat boys and as a counterbalance to this boost remove the RAS option?

          Ok, so that was the thought process. But what if instead of that, Sera could make a plain Sacu with no buffs at all and then choose to add Ras to it. Doesn't stop players choosing to build the combat paths onto the plain Sacus should they wish.

          Good to get some conversation going!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • FtXCommandoF
            FtXCommando
            last edited by

            No, they don’t need ras sacu on top of advanced rambo, shield, and tml sacus. Some factions just flat out don’t even have a decent combat sacu at all (aeon) and honestly combat sacus are way more useful than ras sacus in the first place.

            Also sacus are being reworked anyway.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • QuietJoyQ
              QuietJoy @maudlin27
              last edited by

              @maudlin27 Well today I was this years old when I learnt that all Sera Sacus give a nice little mass boost, I see what you are saying, thanks for letting me know 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • QuietJoyQ
                QuietJoy @ThomasHiatt
                last edited by

                @thomashiatt So this is a GPG thing and not a FAF thing? I had no idea. I'd still personally lean towards wanting a Ras option but if the Sacus are currently being rebalanced then maybe it will happen 🙂

                Thanks all for your inputs 🙂

                Y 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • KaletheQuickK
                  KaletheQuick
                  last edited by

                  @scout_more_often I'm generally against this idea. I generally hate the sera, but I appreciate anything that makes it seem like their approach to this whole thing is from another place, 'alien' you could say.

                  At most I'd be down for some unit they could build that was a RAS unit. Keep it different solutions for the same problem.

                  You must deceive the enemy, sometimes your allies, but you must always deceive yourself!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • LightBearerL
                    LightBearer @QuietJoy
                    last edited by

                    @scout_more_often said in Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?:

                    I'd rather not have to lean on team-mates who are always strangers to me. I also need to ask for a T3 engineer asap to get my Gateway built and that's an expensive unit when they may only have one or two themselves. And they may not want a T3 Sera in return etc. And maybe they don't speak my language. There are many issues with this as you see......

                    I have little experience with this but I've played a few gap games and so I asked for a t1 cybran from the start and developed my own t3 alongside my sera tech. All I did was type a note marker on the cybran players base "T1 Engi please" Worked like a charm

                    Let there be light

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Y
                      Yeager @QuietJoy
                      last edited by

                      @scout_more_often said in Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?:

                      @thomashiatt So this is a GPG thing and not a FAF thing? I had no idea. I'd still personally lean towards wanting a Ras option but if the Sacus are currently being rebalanced then maybe it will happen 🙂

                      Thanks all for your inputs 🙂

                      This is not true. Original sera sacu did not have ras, but produced 5 mass and 500 energy right out of the gate. Therefore allowing sera to spam non-upgraded sacus for at least some sacu economy.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ZLOZ
                        ZLO @QuietJoy
                        last edited by

                        @scout_more_often said in Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?:

                        @maudlin27 said in Seraphim Support ACUs no RAS?:

                        The sera sacu can also be used to eco. It’s worse than a ras sacu at eco but much better for combat, so gives a useful ‘jack of all trades’ option

                        I genuinely understand that any Sacu can build mass fabs. I'm just curious why no RAS. I'm not saying it's a good or bad idea just curious.

                        As it was said, they were originally designed to have no RAS.
                        We can only guess... and i guess developers decided that RAS is boring and gave them more combat options instead.

                        Their teleport can be very usefull in lategame. Tho i guess developers didn't really anticipate that it can be easy to defend against singular teleporting sacus by overlapping shields

                        TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI" | http://www.youtube.com/user/dimatularus | http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post