FAF Live & Viewership Feedback
-
- 15-30 minutes is most tempting for me to watch as I can combine that with household tasks.
- Analytical > fun, but fun is okay!
- Mid-level please, experimentals and epic games are over represented. I learn more from failed and successful rushes and cheeses.
-
-
As long as there are streamers to run it, i think stream can be quite long, if viewers are bored they can just cut it and come back later no ?
-
Fun and entertaining personality. That's a shame that people like Gyle, BRNK or Willow only make Youtube vids, I sometimes wish casual tourneys could be covered in their style, and keep the analytical stuff to competitive tourneys like Lots.
-
A mix of both I guess. I guess my ideal in term of casting would be what T90 does for AoE2. Pro stuff, serious tourneys and also casual / noob games. I think most of our streamers on FAF are either pros that only play and comment pro stuff (over 2k), or very casual teamgames. Mid range ladder and tmm (between 1200 and 2000) is almost never casted for instance.
-
-
What is a sufficient length for a stream? What is too short?
Stream length is kind of irrelevant tbh, I doubt most people are going to sit there and watch all 8h of a tournament. So basically what Aurico said.
This should be more of a concern for the players rather than the viewers, playing more than like 4h should be an exception for something big like LotS imo. 4h is already kind of a big time investment. Also BO1 leads to more whacky (=more interesting) games I think. -
@FemtoZetta yes, I asked a number of players their feelings as I detailed in the post, found most were frustrated or turned away by events going longer than 5 hours. This is a supplemental feedback thread to inquire with the viewers of the events.
-
-
I think what he means is that he comes and watches the stream for 15-30 minutes goes off to do some stuff around the house and so on for the whole stream. Anyway that's what I'm currently doing. Watch the stream for 10-30 minutes, do some stuff around the house, come watch the stream again while eating some food, do some other stuff around the house and so on.
So if anything I don't mind long streams, if anything I would be more worried about players and casters as they are after all nothing but amateurs so going on for 4-8 hours without break can be way too much for them handle.
-
Hey there, this is a thing...
So some context:
I am someone that doesn't play often but watches -every- stream I can, a bit of a fangirl for Faf at this point...What is a sufficient length for a stream? What is too short?3-4 hour streams are perfect. I've noticed streamers struggle with the periods of waiting between games, I guess they just need to structure things better for official casts?
I want to help, don't know how...When it comes to caster style, do you prefer a fun and entertaining personality or a deeply-analytical one?I use to enjoy the analytical streams when I was newer to FaF, as I learnt the players and what is going on I enjoy the "meme" or banter between players and the entertaining personalities more so.. Wheele, (Drunk) Jagged, Tagada for streams...
I honestly think a balance of Analytical and Personality is needed, however, the people I pointed out are often the ones in the tourny we watch... So I want to suggest the YouTubers please stream? - I would like to cast but don't have the internet speeds for quality video...What kind of content do you want to see on FAF Live? Strictly high-level play, a mix of high-level and average-joe events, anything and everything possible (the more the merrier)I watch -everything- I can... From Gyle, derp-memes and highlevel casts...
I do suggest there be more Avg Joe tournies, 1500-2000 bracket... - Yes I love watching the top 10 players constantly beat each other up, but it is rather hard to keep up with their quick nature, sometimes the casters even miss things.I'd also like to suggest a King of the Hill Tounry (In the glory of SC2 tourny that was hosted by The Great Totalbiscuit back in the day.)
I hope I've been helpful.. Dies
-Fidge-y~
-
@Fidget thanks! That was a great response and helps a lot to hear that kind of feedback.
-
I think there is a wide range of viewers too and they all like something different.
I think its great to have a variety of casters. A combination of an analytical one and a fun/background/flavor one might be good.
When you have a cast where two casters are both trying to analyze what is happening, it becomes hard to follow. If any, the second caster could point out action happening out of the main window if the main caster isn't noticing it, but otherwise it works.I think nobody will watch an 8 hour stream in one sitting, but people will join and leave throughout.
It's just terrible for the casters, so be sure to have a good rotation after every few matches.
In addition, even if the tournament takes 4 hours, there's a lot more content to go through afterwards, since theres 4-8 matches being played at the same time on average normally
-
What is a sufficient length for a stream? What is too short?
I'm never catching anything live so agree with what others have said, I'll just watch the stream at my own pace. Only thing I'd mention is the FAF Live channel has a lot of quite short streams as there's typically a restart or two due to technical issues. I understand this is because the stream is used by many different people so nobody is proficient, but working out those issue before starting would give a more polished feel.
Perhaps just a checklist provided by one of the experienced streamers to go through before beginning could help? (as Jip has suggested)When it comes to caster style, do you prefer a fun and entertaining personality or a deeply-analytical one?
Considering FAF Live typically has multiple casters at once I think the most important thing is for them to have an entertaining dynamic. CaptainKlutz and Jip did a good job of bouncing off each other for the Settling Scores cast. A pattern I've seen in other RTS casts is to have a "colour" caster paired with an analytical one, since that leads fairly naturally to a fun dynamic (as FTX suggested).
Another note on polish would be for the casters to take opportunity of 'empty' moments to introduce themselves to the chat, since people (or I at any rate) usually will know names but not voices.What kind of content do you want to see on FAF Live? Strictly high-level play, a mix of high-level and average-joe events, anything and everything possible (the more the merrier)
I personally prefer high-level, but think a mix would be best for the audience more broadly. Another consideration is that the players, casters and tournament directors are mostly drawn from higher level players, as they're the ones volunteering their time what they want to do is probably more important than what the audience to see. And of course as most FAF Live coverage has mostly been high level play to this point, this is also what the existing audience has self-selected for.
The FFA tournament a few months back was interesting to me, as an example of non high level 1v1 gameplay.
