@keyser you right, RAS takes different slot. Well tactical launcher then, for example
Sera nano-regen sucks for its price
yeah well that's good that you can't stack nano + tml, it would be way too op.
In general upgrades that cost more, add less hp/regen in comparison. Look at shields upgrade for example. The efficiency is lowered.
sera nano is a very good upgrade, that do shine for quite a big time on the battlefield.
It isn't linear like many of the other things in this and other games cause you also don't scale your army nor economy linearly.
UEF Nano is an early to early mid game upgrade, while Seraphim's Nano is a mid game upgrade. The fact that you can get Nano + t2 as Seraphim is huge due to extra HP and BP. So yes, both upgrades are strong and useful and no, Seraphim nano is not under powered at all, if it would have the efficiency as UEF nano it would be out right broken.
@herzer99 i got 1400 ladder as sera main
and EUF nanoregen guncom just destroys sera with no chance
sera has no land answer except t2 bunker-PDs
@keyser said in Sera nano-regen sucks for its price:
yeah well that's good that you can't stack nano + tml, it would be way too op.
In general upgrades that cost more, add less hp/regen in comparison. Look at shields upgrade for example. The efficiency is lowered.
sera nano is a very good upgrade, that do shine for quite a big time on the battlefield.
nano+tml is way too op?
so UEF com is OP. Good. How we gonna nerf it?
Keyser: nano+tml is op
also Keyser: waiting for proofs of it from other people
???
you said that this is op, not i
He was talking about Seraphim Nano + t2 + TML.
as UEF you can't get t2 + TML if you have nano and TML is useless without t2. Also can you stop repeating the same arguments that were already answered my at least 3 top rated players? It's just demotivating to come look and write here in the first place.