The ratio of rating to games

0

I ran into a couple of times with a problem that, in my opinion, faf is sick of. People who only play unrated games and have 0 games and 0 ratings. My question is whether this is adequate, players enter the map for the first time, not understanding anything in the game and meet a player with 381 games and maybe not 1 account and how to be, rating games are more honest in this regard. Since you can understand the rating, skill and number of games. And then it turns out a beginner comes in and gets the maximum humiliation from some 0.
In my understanding, the number of unrated games should be displayed. (kazbek analytics)
112344.PNG 12233434.PNG

0

I am rated 100 in 4 games (i m noob) and played with a 600 vs a 600 and a 1200.
We won pretty easy.

All my other games i am reckt in 6 min vs people rated between 0 and 400.
Is the rating a real thing?

EDIT : I am really bad so I make huge mistakes, maybe that one day my ennemy didn t notice, and my mate was in a holy day 🙂

0

Try to play that cart with this person u will understand all.

0

Unranked games are usually completely junk with very little relevance to ranked games or skill.

0

@jcvjcvjcvjcv Suppose a person plays the same card every day for six months, but there are no +/- in the rating, and in the number of games, if a beginner enters the card, then he is actually raped by a skill player, but the point is not yet, the balance writes adequate numbers , such as 91 or 86, despite the fact that a fairly high number of games have been played there. My opinion is the second account. As for the skill, check it yourself.

0

Yes, ratings can be distorted by playing the same thing over and over and over again.

Like I am definitely not worth my rating in an open land map.

0

I got my account banned for the same reason by playing on empty account without rating

0

@eternal said in The ratio of rating to games:

I got my account banned for the same reason by playing on empty account without rating

Well, the rule is "1 account per person", right?

0

It would be interesting to show number of unranked games, but... how helpful? For many people it will be survival or Thermo with t3 arty off.

Unfortunately there is no one-size-fits-all ranking system, but what we've got works for the most part for what it's intended for—ranking players that primarily play ranked games.

0

Lately, I've noticed a large number of low rank players with a small number of games. I ask them if they have a new computer and a new account and some of them agree. So their true rank is masked because they have a new account. Some of these players are really high rank players in disguise. I'm not complaining, just making an observation, so I'm ALWAYS leary of low rank/low game players.