FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login
    The current pre-release of the client ("pioneer" in the version) is only compatible to itself. So you can only play with other testers. Please be aware!

    Is an Idea about rankings at FAF with stats from Tourneys/tbh

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    15 Posts 8 Posters 804 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MrBeastM Offline
      MrBeast
      last edited by

      There I show an Idea about rankings, formed on Ftx-es stats posted,
      Thats stats would be changing and shows true skill pro scene of our community.

      Those idea was originally taken from CS:GO Team rankings, so...test.jpg
      So what u think about it:

      DONT BELIVE BH HE IS LIEING

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
      • MrBeastM Offline
        MrBeast
        last edited by MrBeast

        I think stats might be update and showed an not farmed rating as global/tmm/ladder, is real places at the scene.

        DONT BELIVE BH HE IS LIEING

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FtXCommandoF Offline
          FtXCommando
          last edited by

          It’s decent but currently could only really would work with 1v1 since it’s the only area with a consistent enough schedule to do a leaderboard off of.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • SwkollS Offline
            Swkoll
            last edited by

            This might merit it's own thread, but I ran the ELO algorithm on some major tourney matches since LoTS 2019 and got these ELOs:

            Nexus 1099.272909
            Tagada 1070.33372
            Espi 1060.08074
            Blackheart 1047.381412
            Petric 1044.282831
            TURBO2 1024.775141
            Blodir 1021.094128
            Swkoll 1010.023158
            Tex 1004.427425
            Shen 1003.998818
            Paralon 1003.335188
            Yudi 1002.167972
            Box 995.9772686
            Bennis 995.6637473
            WhiteOwl 995.61104
            NarNerdPower 995.3611353
            WoundedElk 995.0967664
            Bloodoath 995.0031833
            Raider 995
            keyser 994.8622503
            Thomas 991.235657
            Farms 990.694092
            Lucied 990.6756125
            Zlo 990.6425223
            Ryfun 990.6351441
            Death_Squad 990.0719798
            Isen 990.0698799
            Adjux 989.8622984
            Bully 985.9777318
            Aurico 985.5310263
            boom 985.5117396
            Smith 985.2848209
            Hybrid 980.8372869
            Jagged 977.9022702
            BlinChlk 976.6583887
            Blast 973.5038839
            Kot 970.030741
            Arch 964.6365672
            Turin 964.1520327
            Eternal 962.337489

            The dataset only has 196 series right now so it's very rough but it gives a rough idea of who has had good tourney performance in the last 2 years.

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • FemtoZettaF Offline
              FemtoZetta
              last edited by

              Does it get resetted every year or will it just be a permanent ladder?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                JazzFunkNoob @Swkoll
                last edited by

                @swkoll Did you use the same sigma as in chess? The distribution appears to be very tight. Or is it just the lack of games so far?

                SwkollS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • SwkollS Offline
                  Swkoll @JazzFunkNoob
                  last edited by

                  @harzer99 I used https://pypi.org/project/elo/ with 1000 default rating. Everyone just has very few games because there haven't been that many tourneys + I didn't bother going back past 2019 LotS.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MrBeastM Offline
                    MrBeast
                    last edited by

                    Not sure if this elos really told who is better, somehow it need to compare with true ladder winnings, maybe league seasons stats.

                    DONT BELIVE BH HE IS LIEING

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T Offline
                      Tagada Balance Team
                      last edited by

                      Ladder league results are misleading in terms of who is the best cause very few top 5 players participate in them.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • MrBeastM Offline
                        MrBeast
                        last edited by

                        and that is true too <(

                        DONT BELIVE BH HE IS LIEING

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          Tagada Balance Team
                          last edited by

                          I think that in terms of determining top 10 players it's best to only look at the big premiere events like Swkoll's invitationals and LoTS (and upcomming Mini Lots tourneys)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T Offline
                            Tagada Balance Team
                            last edited by

                            That's basically what Swkoll's Leadearboard does and for the top 8 players I think it's pretty accurate but it gets less accurate with the lower seeds.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MrBeastM Offline
                              MrBeast
                              last edited by

                              @tagada so is my stats there post I does is shows real statistics.Good

                              DONT BELIVE BH HE IS LIEING

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • BlackheartB Offline
                                Blackheart
                                last edited by

                                Sadly those elo stats are completely useless, the distribution is way too tight - this list says things like bennis vs nexus is only like 65-70% winrate for nexus.

                                Your best clue to see who is good is asking the top players, we have nothing else. It also varies a ton depending on form/rust/maps/etc.

                                Ban Anime

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • T Offline
                                  Tex
                                  last edited by

                                  No shit. But its a cool thing to look at the relative hierarchy for tournament matches.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                  • First post
                                    Last post