Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Those idea was originally taken from CS:GO Team rankings, so... So what u think about it:
I think stats might be update and showed an not farmed rating as global/tmm/ladder, is real places at the scene.
It’s decent but currently could only really would work with 1v1 since it’s the only area with a consistent enough schedule to do a leaderboard off of.
This might merit it's own thread, but I ran the ELO algorithm on some major tourney matches since LoTS 2019 and got these ELOs:
Nexus 1099.272909 Tagada 1070.33372 Espi 1060.08074 Blackheart 1047.381412 Petric 1044.282831 TURBO2 1024.775141 Blodir 1021.094128 Swkoll 1010.023158 Tex 1004.427425 Shen 1003.998818 Paralon 1003.335188 Yudi 1002.167972 Box 995.9772686 Bennis 995.6637473 WhiteOwl 995.61104 NarNerdPower 995.3611353 WoundedElk 995.0967664 Bloodoath 995.0031833 Raider 995 keyser 994.8622503 Thomas 991.235657 Farms 990.694092 Lucied 990.6756125 Zlo 990.6425223 Ryfun 990.6351441 Death_Squad 990.0719798 Isen 990.0698799 Adjux 989.8622984 Bully 985.9777318 Aurico 985.5310263 boom 985.5117396 Smith 985.2848209 Hybrid 980.8372869 Jagged 977.9022702 BlinChlk 976.6583887 Blast 973.5038839 Kot 970.030741 Arch 964.6365672 Turin 964.1520327 Eternal 962.337489
The dataset only has 196 series right now so it's very rough but it gives a rough idea of who has had good tourney performance in the last 2 years.
Does it get resetted every year or will it just be a permanent ladder?
@swkoll Did you use the same sigma as in chess? The distribution appears to be very tight. Or is it just the lack of games so far?
@harzer99 I used https://pypi.org/project/elo/ with 1000 default rating. Everyone just has very few games because there haven't been that many tourneys + I didn't bother going back past 2019 LotS.
Not sure if this elos really told who is better, somehow it need to compare with true ladder winnings, maybe league seasons stats.
Ladder league results are misleading in terms of who is the best cause very few top 5 players participate in them.
and that is true too <(
I think that in terms of determining top 10 players it's best to only look at the big premiere events like Swkoll's invitationals and LoTS (and upcomming Mini Lots tourneys)
That's basically what Swkoll's Leadearboard does and for the top 8 players I think it's pretty accurate but it gets less accurate with the lower seeds.
@tagada so is my stats there post I does is shows real statistics.Good
Sadly those elo stats are completely useless, the distribution is way too tight - this list says things like bennis vs nexus is only like 65-70% winrate for nexus.
Your best clue to see who is good is asking the top players, we have nothing else. It also varies a ton depending on form/rust/maps/etc.
No shit. But its a cool thing to look at the relative hierarchy for tournament matches.