FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    What makes you more or less likely to join the 2v2 matchmaker queue?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    15 Posts 11 Posters 1.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Anachronism_A Offline
      Anachronism_
      last edited by Anachronism_

      The primary goal of this thread is to get more feedback for the matchmaker team.

      pfp credit to gieb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • maudlin27M Offline
        maudlin27
        last edited by

        The time it takes to find a game (less time = more likely to use), the map pool (too many naval maps like there were a month or two ago and I'm less likely to use it), and how long I think it'd take to find a game via hosting a custom game.
        The number of players seeking a match will also make me more likely to use it (since it indicates it's likely to be less time to find a game)

        The change giving people timeouts for disconnect failures also made me more likely to use it, since there's been a dramatic decrease in the number of failed games once a match has been found following that change compared to before.

        M27AI and M28AI developer; Devlogs and more general AI development guide:
        https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v71-devlog
        https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v150

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • C Offline
          Cyborg16
          last edited by

          I usually join all three, or only 1v1 or only 4v4.

          Probably the worst point about 2v2 is that you can have unbalanced teams (e.g. 1200 + 1800 vs two 1500) which can be quite significant; with 4v4 it's usually less of an issue simply due to having more players.

          MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • MoraxM Offline
            Morax @Cyborg16
            last edited by

            @cyborg16 said in What makes you more or less likely to join the 2v2 matchmaker queue?:

            I usually join all three, or only 1v1 or only 4v4.

            Probably the worst point about 2v2 is that you can have unbalanced teams (e.g. 1200 + 1800 vs two 1500) which can be quite significant; with 4v4 it's usually less of an issue simply due to having more players.

            Could not agree more, and tried to address this awhile back. @BlackYps @Sheikah can we please adjust? I am fairly certain this is a major factor in 2v2 issues still after this long:

            https://forum.faforever.com/topic/1431/tmm-rating-allowance-needs-to-use-ladder-1v1-matching-or-close-to-it?_=1671411166143

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              Sheikah
              last edited by

              BlackYps already made changes to add greater cost to rating disparity. See here https://forum.faforever.com/topic/4945/allow-us-to-pick-rating-brackets-for-tmm/58 and https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5170/matchmaker-update

              MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • X Offline
                Xayo
                last edited by Xayo

                I like team games. I like the split of responsibilities, the progress through all the tech stages, and adapting towards what my team needs.

                I find teams of 4-5 players ideal for this. With more players than that, my impact on the game becomes so tiny that the game result might as well be random. Any less, and it tends to lead to every player having to do everything (large mental drain -> not something I enjoy as relaxation after work), and games being more prone towards mostly t1 stage.

                So it's just a personal preference toward 4-5 player teams. 2v2 is too much like 1v1 for me. And I don't enjoy 1v1.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • MoraxM Offline
                  Morax @Sheikah
                  last edited by Morax

                  @sheikah said in What makes you more or less likely to join the 2v2 matchmaker queue?:

                  BlackYps already made changes to add greater cost to rating disparity. See here https://forum.faforever.com/topic/4945/allow-us-to-pick-rating-brackets-for-tmm/58 and https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5170/matchmaker-update

                  It does not appear to be working that well:

                  https://replay.faforever.com/18776829

                  Should a 2k+ really be getting paired with a 900? I will admittedly say I did not read the full context, but even so, after getting this reported and checking other games, it seems like it is not addressing the issue.

                  AmygdalaA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AmygdalaA Offline
                    Amygdala @Morax
                    last edited by Amygdala

                    @morax good chance that both teams are premades in the game you linked.
                    However i am not so sure about this beeing the case in this one https://replay.faforever.com/18757301

                    MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MoraxM Offline
                      Morax @Amygdala
                      last edited by Morax

                      @amygdala said in What makes you more or less likely to join the 2v2 matchmaker queue?:

                      @morax good chance that both teams are premades in the game you linked.
                      However i am not so sure about this beeing the case in this one https://replay.faforever.com/18757301

                      No, it's not a premade. Grimplex sent this to me as we were discussing:

                      b5bddc37-cc66-47ba-8557-4feb52ffcc46-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • RobustnessR Offline
                        Robustness
                        last edited by

                        random vs. team

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • AmygdalaA Offline
                          Amygdala
                          last edited by

                          Ah nevermind then, didnt know you got it from grimplex.
                          I agree that 900s shouldnt be thrown into battle with 2ks (like the above examples with grimplex and turin). The limit in rating difference should not be more than 500 points or so.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • BlackYpsB Offline
                            BlackYps
                            last edited by

                            Are you ready to defend the increase in search time that would cause?

                            MoraxM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • E Offline
                              Exselsior
                              last edited by Exselsior

                              If I see enough people in queue I typically click all three. Sometimes I'll just click ladder if there are fewer than two people in the 2v2 or 4 in the 4v4 queue.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • MoraxM Offline
                                Morax @BlackYps
                                last edited by

                                This post is deleted!
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • FemboyF Offline
                                  Femboy Promotions team
                                  last edited by

                                  The rating disparity, in 2v2 Im like a 1k so I get matched with other 1k people but I’m more around 1.5k so I just steamroll super hard and I feel really bad for everyone involved. However, 50% of the time I do get a quality match so it’s pretty decent but not like 4v4 where it always feels balanced

                                  FAF Website Developer

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • MoraxM Morax referenced this topic on
                                  • MoraxM Morax referenced this topic on
                                  • First post
                                    Last post