tbh it happens quite often. Especially often when I've just won and I live the game on instead of closing immediately; I will look into it.
Posts made by Saphed
-
RE: POINTS issue
-
RE: "C-D1 \Rover\" Engineering Drone
Drone is fun and therefore buffing it would make the game even more fun.
-
RE: FAF Beta - Feedback
drone flies fast and clicks rocks, especially on mapgen. Also it's so cheap you can get it in 10 sec reasonably early. If your transport gets intie rushed and you lose the payload it's bad too
-
RE: FAF Beta - Feedback
how could you say drones on acu are useless without even a niche application?
-
RE: WD #3 - Ridiculous Balance Ideas
I know absolver technically isn't bad. I built 2 pieces in one game 2 years ago against a shielded base together with artillery and it was kinda efficient.
Absolver is too specific of a tool to be used in many games. It can crush shields, but it's projectile can't really reach specific moving targets like commanders or harbs. It's good only for bubble shields. Also it's t3, so most games won't get to the point where you'd build it. This is fine, but it's a shame to see such an interesting unit is so rarely.
People often complain about firebeetles being gone, but rarely about absolver bcuz it was never really a thing.
Absolver isn't bad but it's super niche.The(partial) solution:
make it t2, so that it could be used earlier- at tech when shields kick in and players could actually get more opportunities to use it throughout the game. Obv it would require to adj it's stats to be a bit more in line with t2, while kinda staying relevant later(like medusa or obsidian), or maybe just making t2 absolver from scratch just the way it was done to the antiair at t3(although I suppose adding units is a nono) -
RE: Weekly Discussion #23 - T2 MMLs
I guess they are like subs. Can get decent value in very specific scenarios but probably don't overbuild them
-
RE: What are subs for?
in my experience (1400-1600ish ladder) subs can be sometimes useful early on if you know what you are doing and don't overbuild. Not the main thing and not something you'd build every game, but especially since the opponent doesn't expect it you can get some free damage on frigs that are far from navy hq and if he can't react quickly enough for some other reason(air advantage, can't afford t2, not enough apm while u drop at his base or smth)
edit: also, it's a rare thing but as far as I remember some subs have laser whose range is greater than frigs and on certain maps that's the only way to raid certain mexes with navy early on
-
RE: Can we please stop the smurfing in tmm
I don't think it will hurt their insides that much. You do you
-
RE: Can we please stop the smurfing in tmm
tbh this league system is just a weird ui thing over the rating system. If your rating is lower than your league you get less league advancement and vice versa. It won't deviate much lol
-
RE: Invincible Percies on Adaptive Millenium
do you have a replay?
-
RE: Energy Storage adjacency
more mechanics is cool and all, but tbh it complicates things a bit. It would be cool to see more e storage adjacency use on 1v1s since it's already a very fun risk-reward mechanic, where you create easy targets for enemy for an economic gain, but the current ratio almost always doesn't really justify the risk which feels like a waste
-
fixing map readability
Hey guys,
there are some maps in faf that are played competitively, but are far from obvious to read for new players due to the scripts changing certain dynamics, that actually might make players playing them for the first time fall behind. Sometimes the more they know about the game, the more they will get hurt.Let me ilustrate it with an example:
Loki is a very popular , great classic map. Since I played it many times I know that buildings in the middle are basically useless- there is almost no mass to reclaim. Yet any capable player who didn't get to play it before will have a wrong image of the map(that comes from his valid game knowledge) and might consider grabbing the middle to fight for the mexes later as an actual strategical option, only to lose miserably as a consequence if he choses to do so.Proposed solution:
Would that be viable to replace all maps with scripts for ladder with their versions that display the script specifics in text?(something like text in adaptive acid lakes, but informing that the buildings are nerfed) -
RE: Shift-loading units into transports
from what I understand this functionality already is in the game. You just set up ferry from transports and than click on the ferry mark having units selected. You can give complex routes to ferries via shift, but that's not necessary. You can select transports once loaded and give them order just as if the ferry never existed
-
RE: T1 bombers are too good at hunting down expanding engineers
idea sounds interesting but increasing engie hp might make labs absolutely useless
-
RE: Let Nickname start with digit
@bluescreenof4z0t said in Let Nickname start with digit:
4z0t
-
RE: I want to start a noob support community, what do? Also, does anyone want to participate?
isn't it a bit broken if masters can see the whole map as observers?