If you genuinely think you're being insulted then you can make a report to the mod team, or create a ticket to discuss further with the mod team (e.g. if the report is discarded due to not meeting the reporting requirements involving sufficient evidence of a rule breach and you want to understand this further).

Rating manipulation is against FAF rules, so if the game was rated, and it was reported, and the mod reviewing the report thought it indicated manipulation (i.e. deliberately drawing a game that was won to lower your rating) then you could be at risk of a ban, but even in that scenario you could then appeal the ban and explain what happened.

Unless there's a pattern of it happening in other games then I'd have thought it relatively unlikely you'd be banned, and even more unlikely you'd remain banned on appeal, subject to if there's evidence contradicting this.

@Skrat said in New account in FAF:

@snoog I didn't ask questions that required endless discussion. But for some reason, no one can answer them.

Questions you've asked from another skim through them:

1. What could be the moderators' reasons for giving a player permission to create a new account?
2. The more secrecy there is, the more questions there are. Is not it so?
3. Should moderators delete my nickname history upon my request?
4. Can you ask to have your account deleted and come back on a new one a few years down the line?

Most have been answered already.

1. See Jip's first post for potential reasons (If I understood correct then in this situation a player returned who requested to have his account deleted a few years ago. That means he can't restore the old account. The only way to play again would be to create a new account.)
2. We've had seemingly near-endless threads and questions about moderation in spite of there being far more public information about how moderation is undertaken than a couple of years ago.
3. You can ask to have your account deleted.
4. As Jip already said, there's no guarantee but you're free to try.

I doubt you're going to be satisfied with these answers though since you seemed to think no-one had answered your questions.

As for "I'm not asking for more or less bureaucracy. I ask the moderators to be consistent and logical"
Actually you're asking for more bureaucracy, asking the moderators to be inconsistent, and dismissing logic given to you for why they might not want to do what you want (Jip and Giebmasse's posts). You seem to be asking that in the event that the moderators decide to allow someone who deleted their account to use a new account, the moderators make this information public (that's asking for more buraeucracy). It'd also mean an exception is made by the moderators against the normal approach of not making their decisions public and/or discussing specific cases (i.e. for them to be inconsistent).

Locking the thread as I don't think it's appropriate to publicly try and shame people, and I don't see anything positive coming from this thread.