FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Deceiver < Stinger < Atlantis / Czar Do you think this should be a bug or a feature?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    108 Posts 28 Posters 11.1k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C Offline
      clyf @BlackYps
      last edited by

      @blackyps

      We've arrived at lexical analysis. An inevitability to it. But we can do it together.

      From your quoted section:

      and given that you can not select the unit (even though when the game thinks you can, but can't)

      Background: when stingers with attached units are in carriers, the stinger can still be highlighted from outside the carrier as though it could be selected (but it can't be selected). You can test this for yourself or look at the photo Jip posted as an example.

      "The unit" in the paragraph in question refers to a unit which "the game thinks you can [select], but can't". The next sentence in the paragraph (that you omitted) refers to "the cargo of the unit".

      The unit is a stinger, carrying another unit, inside a carrier. As a context clue, the introductory section of that post (after the, you know, other stuff) mentions the engine being unable to properly process transports-within-transports or transports-within-cargo.

      From Jip's earlier comments, some five days prior:

      Being able to give constant stealth a CZAR because of this glitch can hardly be considered intended

      The interaction being discussed is clearly unintended. No other unit that enters the Atlantis has this bug for example, except for Stingers with cargo

      Zero interest in belaboring this point further.

      So. Is there a pot of gold for me at the end of this rainbow? I don't think you understood the point I was making before. It seems you also didn't understand the section you quoted to refute that point (that you didn't understand). You can't claim in good faith that I haven't articulated my arguments. Your MO is heavy on gotchas and it's diminishing my desire to continue this conversation. Where do we go from here?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • MazorNoobM Offline
        MazorNoob
        last edited by

        There's a difference between "unintended" as in explicitly not wanted and "unintended" as in emergent behaviour. Nobody patched out groundfiring subs even though it's also "clearly unintended", how is this different?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BlackYpsB Online
          BlackYps
          last edited by

          I'm sorry, but this thread is wasting my time

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • veteranasheV Offline
            veteranashe
            last edited by

            It's wasting everyone's time as the people who need to hear this aren't listening

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              clyf @BlackYps
              last edited by

              @blackyps

              Join the club.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BlackYpsB Online
                BlackYps
                last edited by

                What club

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bakiB Offline
                  baki
                  last edited by

                  can i join

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    clyf
                    last edited by

                    The "this thread is wasting my time club".

                    And of course, all are welcome.

                    Yps, despite our difference of opinion here you seem like an alright character, and I have great respect for the work you've put into the community. I think we've identified our points of divergence, exhaustively, and we can leave this conversation as it is, as a testament to the hazards of interpreting religious texts*.

                    *By that I mean Jip's posts, of course.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • BlackYpsB Online
                      BlackYps
                      last edited by

                      Thank you for the kind words. I appreciate it

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        Tryth
                        last edited by

                        I agree with @SpikeyNoob whatever he said I will back thanks

                        SpikeyNoobS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • SpikeyNoobS Offline
                          SpikeyNoob Global Moderator @Tryth
                          last edited by

                          @tryth said in Deceiver < Stinger < Atlantis / Czar Do you think this should be a bug or a feature?:

                          I agree with @SpikeyNoob whatever he said I will back thanks

                          Enjoy your £5!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • First post
                            Last post