• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login
FAForever Forums
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Login

A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
48 Posts 18 Posters 4.6k Views 1 Watching
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    FtXCommando
    last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 10:08

    Phim destro doesnt beat sub hunters. It would be OP if it did, why would you ever bother surfacing?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
    • M Offline
      MazorNoob
      last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 10:23

      I'm pretty sure last time I tested phim destroyer versus 2 sub hunters, it killed both with 30% of its health remaining. It actually did better than Cybran destroyer, which was left at around 25%.

      F 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 11:25 Reply Quote 0
      • W Offline
        wikingest @Yeager
        last edited by wikingest 2 Jan 2023, 10:31 1 Feb 2023, 10:30

        @yeager said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

        actually, every single unit in the sera navy loses mass to mass vs the cybran t2 sub

        After one of my comments, destroyers got fixed (althought you spoke about it much before me). So now destroyers (besides UEF) are supposed to win quite well against submarines. Supposed... I just ran a fast sandbox, and it seems that they are broken again. 1 Sera destro barely wins against 2 subhunters, but in bigger groups they get wrecked by subhunters. Althought maybe less than in the past...

        W Y 2 Replies Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 18:30 Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          FtXCommando @MazorNoob
          last edited by FtXCommando 2 Jan 2023, 11:28 1 Feb 2023, 11:25

          @mazornoob said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

          I'm pretty sure last time I tested phim destroyer versus 2 sub hunters, it killed both with 30% of its health remaining. It actually did better than Cybran destroyer, which was left at around 25%.

          In big numbers phim destro loses massively due to no torp defense while sub hunters have decent defense.

          The inability to deal with sub hunter spam is why phim t2 navy can never lose air.

          W 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 12:28 Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            MazorNoob
            last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:00

            Okay, I stand corrected. Good to know.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W Offline
              wikingest
              last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:01

              Since when Seraphim destros have no torp defence???

              F 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 12:05 Reply Quote 0
              • Z Offline
                ZLO
                last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:03

                don't sera t1 subs lose in 1v1 to any other t1 sub?

                TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI" | http://www.youtube.com/user/dimatularus | http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd

                F 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 12:16 Reply Quote 0
                • F Offline
                  FtXCommando @wikingest
                  last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:05

                  @wikingest said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                  Since when Seraphim destros have no torp defence???

                  It has torp defense, it’s just really bad. That’s why it can’t just viably be a sub, the submerging is a defense mechanic against close range swarms of uef destro or frigs.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F Offline
                    FtXCommando @ZLO
                    last edited by FtXCommando 2 Jan 2023, 12:17 1 Feb 2023, 12:16

                    @zlo said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                    don't sera t1 subs lose in 1v1 to any other t1 sub?

                    Idk about 1v1 but sera sub is the only really viable sub to do Yudi style sub spam gimmicks because of the torp defense. I don’t really think that’s a justification for the unit to stay what it is though since that isn’t really intended gameplay nor is it really any good just funny. A more defensively focused sub would be cool to play around with.

                    The fact sera has hover engies also means they aren’t insanely destroyed by a lack of early torp options, though it will be a pain to deal with underwater mexes though maps with them suck anyway psycho

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • W Offline
                      wikingest @FtXCommando
                      last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:28

                      @ftxcommando said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                      no torp defense

                      Yeah, I thought this was a lie. Sera destroyers surface to have more dps and range. And if they would not surface, Aeon destroyers would hard crush them.

                      Sera destros were quite good against subs, and I dont remember balance change, that states that one faction on t2 navy needs to solely count on air.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 12:35 Reply Quote 1
                      • I Offline
                        itsame_GULMO
                        last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:32

                        imho sera battleship is the best at ground firing subs thanks to his high rate of fire

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • F Offline
                          FtXCommando @wikingest
                          last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:35

                          @wikingest said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                          @ftxcommando said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                          no torp defense

                          Yeah, I thought this was a lie. Sera destroyers surface to have more dps and range. And if they would not surface, Aeon destroyers would hard crush them.

                          Sera destros were quite good against subs, and I dont remember balance change, that states that one faction on t2 navy needs to solely count on air.

                          They’ve never been good against t2 subs

                          W 1 Reply Last reply 1 Feb 2023, 12:42 Reply Quote 0
                          • M Offline
                            Mach
                            last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:38

                            imo underwater units shouldn't be able to get groundfired by surface weapon

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • W Offline
                              wikingest @FtXCommando
                              last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:42

                              @ftxcommando said in A small rework/ buff to sera t1 sub to rebalance their navy:

                              They’ve never been good against t2 subs

                              Yes they were good, I had similar results as @MazorNoob.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • F Offline
                                FtXCommando
                                last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 12:55

                                So you also saw they lose in real game numbers not some sandbox 1v1? Great.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W Offline
                                  wikingest
                                  last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 13:46

                                  So you recognise that you lied once more. And now you pretend, that unit statistics are different in sandbox? And we are supposed to believe it? 🙂

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • F Offline
                                    FtXCommando
                                    last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 13:47

                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • F Offline
                                      FemtoZetta
                                      last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 14:32

                                      Idk what you tested wikingest but Sera destros definitely lose to T2 subs in numbers. Starting at about 4 destros vs 8 subs (mass equivalent) like 3 subs survive the encounter, so it's a quite brutal loss for Sera and it just gets worse at higher numbers. Your hairsplitting just makes you seem dumb and uninformed.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W Offline
                                        wikingest
                                        last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 14:41

                                        @FemtoZetta Thats exactly what I said. I would recommend to read my comments first. Sera destros used to largely win against subs, and now they are losing. So it must be broken. Or have you seen a balance change that made Sera t2 navy depend entirely from air? Was there a balance decision to make sera destros weaker than subs lately?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • F Offline
                                          FemtoZetta
                                          last edited by 1 Feb 2023, 14:56

                                          Not sure what kind of earlier you talk about, but Sera destros have lost to T2 subs for years.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          14 out of 48
                                          • First post
                                            14/48
                                            Last post