zopniky 557
)
I see them as really good situational options against UEF and Seraphim navies. It's especially important to note that for some time (as long as I can remember) folks have said that Sera navy is oppressive while any T2 TD will give you a reasonably powerful defensive option against T2 Sera navy if you sensibly combine them with TMD.
For a price of a half of a Destroyer you get about the same DPS, and a bit more HP.
Which is wild to think about because for the same price as one destroyer, you have a defensive option that can:
They are easily outranged and destroyed by T2 ships.
For only Cybran and Aeon ships. At least for me, that's great faction diversity.
If you're against Cybran and/or Aeon navy then you can't rely on static defences to protect you from destroyers. Sure, every faction has cruisers but only UEF and Seraphim have cruisers that can similarly deal damage to torpedo launchers without being hit back - and those factions can't attack your T2 TD with destroyers without being immediately hit themselves.
T2 TD does one thing pretty well: make enemy navy lose momentum.
I enjoy using T2 TD. I would like to know how making them movable or some other direct buff (range, damage, etc.) won't also make them that much more oppressive against UEF and Seraphim navy as a result. It's a situational tool that plays into understanding the unit mix of the factions you're playing with and against to make combat more complex.
I'll sign up as a free agent.
FAF: zopniky, 1165
Discord: zopniky
I'll sign up as a free agent.
FAF: zopniky, 1165
Discord: zopniky
I see them as really good situational options against UEF and Seraphim navies. It's especially important to note that for some time (as long as I can remember) folks have said that Sera navy is oppressive while any T2 TD will give you a reasonably powerful defensive option against T2 Sera navy if you sensibly combine them with TMD.
For a price of a half of a Destroyer you get about the same DPS, and a bit more HP.
Which is wild to think about because for the same price as one destroyer, you have a defensive option that can:
They are easily outranged and destroyed by T2 ships.
For only Cybran and Aeon ships. At least for me, that's great faction diversity.
If you're against Cybran and/or Aeon navy then you can't rely on static defences to protect you from destroyers. Sure, every faction has cruisers but only UEF and Seraphim have cruisers that can similarly deal damage to torpedo launchers without being hit back - and those factions can't attack your T2 TD with destroyers without being immediately hit themselves.
T2 TD does one thing pretty well: make enemy navy lose momentum.
I enjoy using T2 TD. I would like to know how making them movable or some other direct buff (range, damage, etc.) won't also make them that much more oppressive against UEF and Seraphim navy as a result. It's a situational tool that plays into understanding the unit mix of the factions you're playing with and against to make combat more complex.
Also, if this is the U1500 tournament, should the instructions say to join "#U1500" instead?