My thoughts about balance
-
@gabitii No he’s saying you guys don’t know how to use the units correctly
-
No single game thats played competitively is balanced towards the average player because it would result in either massively dumbing down the game or be completely imbalanced in way more maps and gamemodes than just a single map
-
@tryth said in My thoughts about balance:
@gabitii No he’s saying you guys don’t know how to use the units correctly
Honestly, from the gameplay of 2k+ mapgen players. I would say they are better not because they know how to use mobile units better, but because they do know way better how to balance resources. And I do not only mean having your resource bar to be perfect, but in the gameplay. How much resources you need to spend for defence, for example, lower rated players usually spend way more in defense then needed. They have a better experience in attacking gathering a critical mass, so that it will not be a mass donation. And also importatn mention they do know better of how much BP they need right now and how much BP they will be needing in a short future. It is not only about using units properly, it is about rightfully spending resources (not meant of balancing the resource bar). It is my perspective of how I see top players.
-
@thewheelie said in My thoughts about balance:
No single game thats played competitively is balanced towards the average player because it would result in either massively dumbing down the game or be completely imbalanced in way more maps and gamemodes than just a single map
What about my concrete suggestions on balance?
-
@gabitii it was already explained why dualgap is out of scope of balance discussions, i wont repeat it. Doesnt matter if half playerbase resides there, if it means that every other map gets fucked to make it more enjoyable for you, its not happening. Besides, if any sort of high rated game not on dualgap style map is good enough to understand more about how balance works outside of gap! Just queue like 3v3 or smth
-
@tomma said in My thoughts about balance:
@gabitii it was already explained why dualgap is out of scope of balance discussions, i wont repeat it. Doesnt matter if half playerbase resides there, if it means that every other map gets fucked to make it more enjoyable for you, its not happening. Besides, if any sort of high rated game not on dualgap style map is good enough to understand more about how balance works outside of gap! Just queue like 3v3 or smth
I do play mapgens and 3v3, specially lately, and I see not a big difference in navy gameplay on average water 20x20 mapgen and dual gap when it comes to navy. Except for in mapgen you might not have underwater mexes.
I played also setons for a while, yeah, that map is very special in terms of navy gameplay.
-
@gabitii i dunno then, perhaps you play with bad people so that you overestimate power of cybran destro! I do not claim to be good, but if you want to test it we can do that!
-
@tomma said in My thoughts about balance:
@gabitii i dunno then, perhaps you play with bad people so that you overestimate power of cybran destro! I do not claim to be good, but if you want to test it we can do that!
let's do it
-
@gabitii so you think you could beat me in a 1v1 if we both started with a paragon?
-
@gabitii let me update my client!!!
-
Your aurora problems overlook the fact Aeon has blaze and flare to address weaknesses of aurora when the weaknesses are too large for the strength. Your aurora suggestions are just normalizing the factions for no pertinent reason since Aeon t1-early t2 stage is hardly a problem.
Your t2 air diagnosis is just wrong, janus is not the most OP t2 air unit. Aeon has the best t2 air roster due to the sheer flexibility of their gunship in combination with all the mass concentration advantages janus brings in fighting air fights via swift wind. Corsairs and Notha across a large distribution of games are each capable of ending games in way more flexible ways than janus which will always require at least 6-8 prior to doing relevant damage. Especially since a janus play will always revolve around powerlocking, notha or corsair can simply bleed you by killing mexes which janus are pretty terrible at killing. Likewise they can go for ACUs.
Aeon gun was insane, two players can play exactly the same and Aeon will win with an ACU that has half HP. The gun existed as a solution when neither flare nor blaze solved the problem of aurora and Aeon t2 stage was using Asylums to keep aurora alive until you could harb rush.
Sub gameplay is just totally not based in reality. Early frigs don't care about subs because they kill BP in the water. You kill the frig, I just killed 50% of your bp, now I will have even more frigs which spread across the map which give me intel, passive AA damage, and kill your expansions. So long as frigates are the designated AA/Radar/HP of navy, they will basically always dominate subs in importance. Particularly since 6 t1 engies can emergency build a t1 torp launcher and halt any damage to BP that a sub could possibly do, can't do that against a frigate.
Giving UEF destro strong torp defense is a terrible idea just because cooper exists. Your suggestion is once against an uncreative normalization of factions rather than playing into the fact UEF has the most unit-mix centered navy of the 4 factions in T2 stage.
Your battleship analysis is just wrong, UEF BS is only going to get good at large quantities. This is just a commonly held opinion. Aeon BS is considered the best BS across maps just because it's rare to get senton style maps where you see 8+ battleships fighting each other. Aeon is the best in small quantities, especially in combination with a push leveraging their strong destro.
Aircraft carriers are good, they are huge HP for mass and give good AA. Include some aircraft carriers with some torp defense and torpaggedon has a real pain dealing with anything. Aircraft carriers are also much better at dealing with gunships thanks to the HP and range compared to cruisers, which are a common counter to deal with navy without losing mass in torps to random aa.
The destro stuff is just whatever. I had a game once where Yudi would keep microing his sera destros and passively building up numbers while repairing via resto field against Farm who kept making salems. At some point it was like 8 salems against 3 phim destros and they still couldn't manage to kill 1 of the destros because he would dodge enough damage that the regen + vet would keep the destros going. At some point Yudi matched the destro count and ran Farm over. This was on flood tabula too, not even a wide open navy map.
Aeon destro is a one-unit-does-all button that is harder to dodge than salem. It is better.
-
Aurora are bad in some cases but they are also very good in some cases. If you have a problem with this, you may address our good friend faction diversity
-
@waffelznoob The only way to make this man happy is to have 0 faction diversity and to make every single unit in every faction function the exact same and have the exact same stats. Change my mind.
-
He is me
-
@tryth But then what excuse will be used when you lose vs this perfect balance?
-
@exselsior if you could find an excuse then youd be a lot smarter than me
-
@ftxcommando said in My thoughts about balance:
Your aurora problems overlook the fact Aeon has blaze and flare to address weaknesses of aurora when the weaknesses are too large for the strength. Your aurora suggestions are just normalizing the factions for no pertinent reason since Aeon t1-early t2 stage is hardly a problem.
I literally named you all the weaknesses and strength. Strength are range and hover (which is a doubtable strength, more a feature). Weaknesses are low HP and low speed. I have not told you to normalize factions, I have never said that, even my suggestion on auroras was not aimed to normalize them.
Yes flares are strong when raiding, but they are too weak in tanks vs tanks battle. Regarding auroras it is not only my opinion, I heard also high rated map gen players saying they are bad.
Your t2 air diagnosis is just wrong, janus is not the most OP t2 air unit. Aeon has the best t2 air roster due to the sheer flexibility of their gunship in combination with all the mass concentration advantages janus brings in fighting air fights via swift wind. Corsairs and Notha across a large distribution of games are each capable of ending games in way more flexible ways than janus which will always require at least 6-8 prior to doing relevant damage. Especially since a janus play will always revolve around powerlocking, notha or corsair can simply bleed you by killing mexes which janus are pretty terrible at killing. Likewise they can go for ACUs.
Corsairs on mexes? For real? It is so ineffective, dude. U need like 3, and sometimes 4 corsairs to kill a single t2 mex. Notas yes.
Aeon gun was insane, two players can play exactly the same and Aeon will win with an ACU that has half HP. The gun existed as a solution when neither flare nor blaze solved the problem of aurora and Aeon t2 stage was using Asylums to keep aurora alive until you could harb rush.
I agree on that, I have never said it was ok. I just said that the nerf is way too hard. I would rather make advanced range same as normal range upgrade, cause it is too expensive for 5 ranges. It requires t2 pgen in most of cases and almost same as shield upgrade in mass.
Sub gameplay is just totally not based in reality. Early frigs don't care about subs because they kill BP in the water. You kill the frig, I just killed 50% of your bp, now I will have even more frigs which spread across the map which give me intel, passive AA damage, and kill your expansions. So long as frigates are the designated AA/Radar/HP of navy, they will basically always dominate subs in importance. Particularly since 6 t1 engies can emergency build a t1 torp launcher and halt any damage to BP that a sub could possibly do, can't do that against a frigate.
You have right when talking about small maps, frig rush killing engies is very good, but when you are talking about bigger maps, frig is not as powerful cause it simply takes more time untill it reaches destination.
Giving UEF destro strong torp defense is a terrible idea just because cooper exists. Your suggestion is once against an uncreative normalization of factions rather than playing into the fact UEF has the most unit-mix centered navy of the 4 factions in T2 stage.
Ok may be my suggestion was not right and not the best, but you agree that there is a problem in UEF t2 navy, right?
Your battleship analysis is just wrong, UEF BS is only going to get good at large quantities. This is just a commonly held opinion. Aeon BS is considered the best BS across maps just because it's rare to get senton style maps where you see 8+ battleships fighting each other. Aeon is the best in small quantities, especially in combination with a push leveraging their strong destro.
Ok, I have not told that the problem is in UEF and Aeon Bships, I told that there is a problem in cybran t3 bships.
Aircraft carriers are good, they are huge HP for mass and give good AA. Include some aircraft carriers with some torp defense and torpaggedon has a real pain dealing with anything. Aircraft carriers are also much better at dealing with gunships thanks to the HP and range compared to cruisers, which are a common counter to deal with navy without losing mass in torps to random aa.
For real? You build Aircraft carriers for AA? The only Aircraft carrier that has a good AA is Atlantis, or the other are shit in relation mass/AA. All the aircrafts are nothing when taking into account that there is hover flaks. I never want to spend that much mass on AC when I can take engie from an ally and build hover flaks? Or drop an engie and build bunch of SAMS will be more effective. AC are just the units that are barely used.
The destro stuff is just whatever. I had a game once where Yudi would keep microing his sera destros and passively building up numbers while repairing via resto field against Farm who kept making salems. At some point it was like 8 salems against 3 phim destros and they still couldn't manage to kill 1 of the destros because he would dodge enough damage that the regen + vet would keep the destros going. At some point Yudi matched the destro count and ran Farm over. This was on flood tabula too, not even a wide open navy map.
I have not told you that sera destros are bad, vice versa, I told that they are OP and told that aeon destros are bad and that I do not support salem buff, because it was not needed. Irrelevant example
Aeon destro is a one-unit-does-all button that is harder to dodge than salem. It is better.
Oh really? Why though? They have the same muzzle velocity, like exactly same. -
@tryth said in My thoughts about balance:
@waffelznoob The only way to make this man happy is to have 0 faction diversity and to make every single unit in every faction function the exact same and have the exact same stats. Change my mind.
I have never told that, dude. I can give you an example where I find the balance perfect, it is t3 land. For me it is the most interesting gameplay, cause the factions are diverse, have their weaknesses and advantages, they are not copy paste and they are balanced very fine. Well done Balance Team on that!
-
@tryth said in My thoughts about balance:
@gabitii so you think you could beat me in a 1v1 if we both started with a paragon?
I have no idea about how to take your opinion seriously when you keep writing these meaningless sentences.
-
@gabitii Flares being weak vs tanks in direct engagement is besides the point, they only need to be good at raiding and being able to concentrate themselves so that they can take good trades vs tanks. Auroras being bad in generic teamgames is also expected, its the same reason other t1 tanks bad but even worse.
Additional range on acu is mega worth it because it allows you to oc units in t3 stage much more safely. Also like not that aeon is bad without that additional range, right? So being able to get it on too of all the nice stuff is strictly better.
