Often when players get confused about this it's just because they die in a game early, join another one & win - then leave at the end of that to see their rating went down since the rating loss from the first game was more than the rating gain from the second game.
You can see the rating gain/loss on any specific game in the replay tab, don't try to guess which game won/lost rating from your overall rating.
tbh I'm a bit surprised there's no minor nerf to cybran frigs. Like a 2.5-5% increase in cost so you don't have to really revolutionise anything before taking a deeper look at navy, but at least not making them dominate so brutally in small ponds. They're currently 7% cheaper than the next cheapest frig (sera) while having 17% more surface dps, a minor cost increase won't change it being the best but would somewhat mitigate its lead.
The avatars look cool. They also match up with the faction colours.
I think this would be fun & I'd play more ladder bc of it.
You should've made cybran stun affect SAMs too, since we were robbed of chrono affecting air.
Not in favour.
Since seton's has a super evolved meta, players' relative performance on seton's can vary quite a lot from their 4v4 TMM rating. Therefore, games with normal players & setons players mixed in will be unbalanced, and being forced to learn setons if you want to not autolose on a map in tmm for a month (for every spot, too) isn't fun.
And then there's the other fact; people who haven't played setons much have avoided it for a reason.
Also seton's games go on a while which exacerbates everything else.
This is exactly like every "will [new game] kill [old game]" debate, e.g valorant & csgo. Talk about the supposed advantages of [new game] as much as you want, people will play the game they know & love for a long time yet.
@trueretard the dps value takes the DoT into account but the dmg value doesn't. Also true for splitting projectiles, like in the aeon T4 arty.