@Whatsisname said in Graphic Artist Wanted:
The tiers 1-5 with 5 being the lowest
is this really set in stone?
I don't think counting down as you go up in tiers is better....
we really need to stop it with this pseudo-clever stuff on faf (looks at the cpu score) it's really counter intuitive to most new fafers
I'm a fair Tier vs Tech person. Tier going lower for higher and higher for lower does make sense.
But if you check, not sure still is. But T for T1, T2, etc is listed as Tech 1 etc in game, I noticed that after getting FA installed awhile back but not sure if was updated or not. But Supcom did start out with Tier and I'm certain FA did as well, just not sure if either stayed that way.
But in terms of Tiers for the work, is really Subdivisions within a tier also, which again on rankings at a time, lower being higher and higher being lower makes sense.
The idea for here is a change for me though also, despite that difference, and I have to relist my listing for division layouts also but only about 15% done of the initial concept and rather I try to keep the icon above to further work on, I don't know, I have no other works in progress either also, so.
Thanks
@Khada_Jhin The reward part of the system in which we are trying to contribute works for, think is fairly limited, if not quite existent, for the purpose but an outcome at a time could still be taken all the same on recognition of course.
But if not mistaken, the avatar/icons are more for positions than ranking.
Hence Unit/Building Icons/Avatars seems reasonable.
Thanks
My point was, Division 1 should be higher ranked than division 3. Just like the places on podium etc.
Its a habit, especially with forums. Still think there is a more formal basis on regards to forum posts other than fancy messengers or texts.
@Khada_Jhin Understood
