So what I'm reading here is that if me and a buddy queue 3v3, we can end a game at will if we both decide to just give up.
We can leave, sure, but we can also force a recall, regardless of what the 3rd player says or thinks.
I have still failed to understand from any of you why it is that 1/3rd of the vote doesn't matter.
The vote should be unanimous as 33% is still a large portion of the equation in 3v3 games.
I can understand the majority vote in 4v4 and larger team games as those are larger groups.
But it just doesn't make sense as to why it's forced in 3v3.
If the vote ends, you can just leave.
Either way, you end up getting out of the game, but one option allows the last player to keep on playing if they wish to.
How is this a bad thing if all 3 players got what they wanted?
The leavers leave and the stayer, stays?
~ Stryker