What do you think? Sexy right?
-
I think its beautiful and interpret biass&ftx's remarks as jealousy
-
@Kenosis said in What do you think? Sexy right?:
maybe make them white
https://mega.nz/folder/Z1kRhBDC#IGMME02K5eJUDl0m10Br3w
This mutiple year old link is an archive to a number of design related books. I never read them, but if you're starting at this level you might find some value in having a look.
FULL-POWER-BENIS said in What do you think? Sexy right?:
I think its beautiful and interpret biass&ftx's remarks as jealousy
yeah when was that mate
-
-
Is probably MEME eligible, as such, signature requirements should be reasonable.
-
@biass nice meme, but read and use brain
-
ok beast
-
It's not by far the best or my best. Who here has made their own signatures avatars. I'm surprised no one noticed I used the fonts that came packed with the game, I think the signature is fine without the letters.
-
I've made signatures, tried to find a disc I had with a bunch on it. Loads of psd files. But couldn't find it yesterday.
Made an entire unit signature just with smudging once. Turned out ok.The font did look familiar but I was thinking something else.
Thanks
-
@Kenosis said in What do you think? Sexy right?:
@biass nice meme, but read and use brain
Surely the eyes are employed first?
-
@QuantumTyphoon said in What do you think? Sexy right?:
It's not by far the best or my best. Who here has made their own signatures avatars.
I'm happy to not have one sentence posts inflated in size due to very large signature images honestly.
The last thing I made was that promotional logo for LOTS.
@QuantumTyphoon said in What do you think? Sexy right?:
I'm surprised no one noticed I used the fonts that came packed with the game
The supcom typefaces only work in supcom because it is a 9 year old strategy game. You can find better familes for any other use. try fonts.google.com