FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Pro
    The current pre-release of the client ("pioneer" in the version) is only compatible to itself. So you can only play with other testers. Please be aware!
    P
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 7
    • Groups 0

    Pro

    @Pro

    3
    Reputation
    1
    Profile views
    7
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    Pro Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Pro

    • RE: Challengers Cup (4v4)(u6000)

      I am signing up the team.

      Team name: Pro Team
      Pro ( Captain ) , global 1527 [discord tag: Pro ]
      b1adam , global 1399
      Strife , global 1422
      System_Failure , global 1572

      total combined team rating: 5920

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • proposal to address the problem of early connection losses in TMM

      Hello everyone. I was prompted to raise this issue by a situation I had recently. Surely each of you has had at least one such situation, that in a team game in matchmaker mode, a situation occurred in which at a very early stage of the game one of the players in the team lost the connection. Unfortunately, very often the causes of this problem are unknown because it also occurs when the players still have a very good connection to the internet but nevertheless lose the connection to the FAF servers. The issue I am getting at is the problem of awarding points after such a match. Namely, I mean such situations as not clicking the draw button by one of the players from a complete team in order to easily win in an unequal match. Unfortunately, the current system allows such behavior, which I think we will all unanimously consider unsportsmanlike. I think it's very unfair when after a hard and long hour of fighting you win and earn fair points for the ranking, only to lose all this effort in such a frustrating and unfair way. Of course, the fact that TMM uses the fullshare option is very good in this situation, but the problem is that it does not help unfortunately if you lose an ally at a very early stage of the game. I would say that the first 5-10 minutes are crucial here, when you are building up your base. I consider the first 5 minutes to be the absolutely critical period - this period cannot be compensated by the fullshare option because in principle, by that time the ally we lost had not yet managed to build anything that taking over could be an adequate compensation for the loss of the ACU. So I think this is a very important problem that requires attention and potential solutions that could eliminate the inequalities resulting from it in the future. My suggestion is the following solutions:

      1. If an ally is lost due to a loss of connection to the server within the first 5 minutes, the match should automatically be unranked. In turn, a preventive measure against the possibility of manipulating the rating resulting from deliberate disconnection to avoid opponents could be simply the possibility of receiving a ban for causing such a situation multiple times in a row.

      2. The second idea I picked up from Nomander is simply the potential to share the ACU with a second player on the team as an improvement to fullshare mode in case of a situation like the one I mentioned above

      To sum up, this is definitely a sore point that is worth taking a closer look at. I'm very curious about your thoughts and I'm waiting for your suggestions. Maybe you will come up with something even better.

      posted in Suggestions
      P
      Pro
    • RE: u1500 1v1 Tournament IV

      I sign up , rank 1107

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: U1100 1v1 Tournament IV

      I'm signing up for the tournament. My FAF name - Pro , 1v1 rating 1082

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: U1100 1v1 Tournament IV

      I was never a real 1600 in 1v1, the maximum I had was 1300 playing on snipes. Besides, it was a year ago and my form has already dropped.I think you should see my games instead of looking at the charts.

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro

    Latest posts made by Pro

    • RE: Challengers Cup (4v4)(u6000)

      I am signing up the team.

      Team name: Pro Team
      Pro ( Captain ) , global 1527 [discord tag: Pro ]
      b1adam , global 1399
      Strife , global 1422
      System_Failure , global 1572

      total combined team rating: 5920

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: Blocking players, dodge list in MM

      @LordVladimer
      on the one hand I understand your frustration because I have an unwritten list of weak players who I know will play poorly as always but on the other hand they shouldn't be deprived of the opportunity to find a game. The best way in such a situation that I can recommend to you are two versions:

      version 1: quick snipe the best player from the opposing team - this should make the game easier even with weak teammates on your side

      version 2: ignore your teammates and focus on eco as quickly as possible. thanks to this when they die you will take over their bases as a result of which you will have incomparably large resources compared to the opposing team which will make it easier for you to defeat them with, for example, a quick experiment or something like that

      posted in Suggestions
      P
      Pro
    • proposal to address the problem of early connection losses in TMM

      Hello everyone. I was prompted to raise this issue by a situation I had recently. Surely each of you has had at least one such situation, that in a team game in matchmaker mode, a situation occurred in which at a very early stage of the game one of the players in the team lost the connection. Unfortunately, very often the causes of this problem are unknown because it also occurs when the players still have a very good connection to the internet but nevertheless lose the connection to the FAF servers. The issue I am getting at is the problem of awarding points after such a match. Namely, I mean such situations as not clicking the draw button by one of the players from a complete team in order to easily win in an unequal match. Unfortunately, the current system allows such behavior, which I think we will all unanimously consider unsportsmanlike. I think it's very unfair when after a hard and long hour of fighting you win and earn fair points for the ranking, only to lose all this effort in such a frustrating and unfair way. Of course, the fact that TMM uses the fullshare option is very good in this situation, but the problem is that it does not help unfortunately if you lose an ally at a very early stage of the game. I would say that the first 5-10 minutes are crucial here, when you are building up your base. I consider the first 5 minutes to be the absolutely critical period - this period cannot be compensated by the fullshare option because in principle, by that time the ally we lost had not yet managed to build anything that taking over could be an adequate compensation for the loss of the ACU. So I think this is a very important problem that requires attention and potential solutions that could eliminate the inequalities resulting from it in the future. My suggestion is the following solutions:

      1. If an ally is lost due to a loss of connection to the server within the first 5 minutes, the match should automatically be unranked. In turn, a preventive measure against the possibility of manipulating the rating resulting from deliberate disconnection to avoid opponents could be simply the possibility of receiving a ban for causing such a situation multiple times in a row.

      2. The second idea I picked up from Nomander is simply the potential to share the ACU with a second player on the team as an improvement to fullshare mode in case of a situation like the one I mentioned above

      To sum up, this is definitely a sore point that is worth taking a closer look at. I'm very curious about your thoughts and I'm waiting for your suggestions. Maybe you will come up with something even better.

      posted in Suggestions
      P
      Pro
    • RE: u1500 1v1 Tournament IV

      I sign up , rank 1107

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: U1100 1v1 Tournament IV

      I was never a real 1600 in 1v1, the maximum I had was 1300 playing on snipes. Besides, it was a year ago and my form has already dropped.I think you should see my games instead of looking at the charts.

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: U1100 1v1 Tournament IV

      I'm signing up for the tournament. My FAF name - Pro , 1v1 rating 1082

      posted in Tournaments
      P
      Pro
    • RE: Remove rating from (default) scoreboard

      This is not good idea for me.why make your life difficult and remember players' ratings before the game?the ratings are there to assess on a regular basis who is playing more difficult or easier.

      posted in Suggestions
      P
      Pro