FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login
    The current pre-release of the client ("pioneer" in the version) is only compatible to itself. So you can only play with other testers. Please be aware!

    T2 torpedo turrets are awful

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    32 Posts 13 Posters 1.0k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • SaverS Offline
      Saver @rampeer
      last edited by

      @rampeer

      Hello,
      I finished my terrace earlier today, so I had time for the mod. I tested the speed at 2.5 and found it to be too fast for what should be a stationary setup. I have therefore set the speed to 1.

      You can also test the mod yourself. It is now on FAF.
      mobile T2 Torpedo Launcher
      3a45d094-342d-4f4f-a2e9-0bf0fdbd69f3-Launcher.png

      auch mal fünf gerade sein lassen

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • B Offline
        Blade_Walker
        last edited by Blade_Walker

        Just FYI - all T2 torp defense also have personal stealth so if moveable they will not show on radar / sonar after you lose vision of them… this would actually make them more useful as (semi) static defense if they had very slow speed (0.1 is minimum I believe)

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          Sainse Balance Team @Blade_Walker
          last edited by

          @Blade_Walker it would be annoying to micro

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R Offline
            rampeer
            last edited by rampeer

            Will try with bots ASAP!

            Did not know t2 turrets have stealth (checked unit DB, it's true). But as it's a building, once spotted (by air scout, for example) the radar blip will always remain while it's in the zone of a radar - right? Sounds like a strange feature

            The more this thread goes on, the more I discover. They are half the price of a destroyer for about the same HP and DPS; not all factions' destroyers outrange T2 torps; they have steath. Maybe underutilization is just a meta thing?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R Offline
              rampeer @Sainse
              last edited by rampeer

              So, I played a couple of games with movable torp launchers. Here are my findings.

              @Saver Thank you a lot!

              @Sainse : you are correct. Despite being very slow, turning speed allows maneuvering them around enemies with ease (especially given stealth). Maybe nerfing turning speed will help that.

              To sum up:

              1. It's too easy to kite with them, given high turning speed. That's bad, as I described above.
              2. They seem fast enough and just shred T1 crap. Movespeed is enough to move turrets in range and intercept units trying to get these juicy engie kills. That's good.
              3. They seem too slow to be in right position during attack. Maybe it's good: their slow speed gives away their trajectory and position, and to effectively push using them, one has to decide: push now, and bombard engineers / factories using current army, OR: push a bit later, wait for T2 torps for extra power.
              4. T2 torps guarantee you safe retreat (after failed push, as they can kite, unless it's due to enemy T2 torp bombers). Another strategic use!

              So, I think it's beneficial buff, but it requires some tuning. Movable long-range bombardment tools with stealth are OP now.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                rampeer
                last edited by

                Dear balance team -- take a note, please.

                It might work.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TheWeakieT Offline
                  TheWeakie
                  last edited by

                  You do realise the entire identity of static defenses is that... they're static right? If they're too weak (which they aren't) they should be buffed in a more logical way

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                  • R Offline
                    rampeer
                    last edited by rampeer

                    You are right... it will a movable defence then! Other ways to buff seem to break the game in one way or another, as discussed above

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                    • T Offline
                      TankenAbard
                      last edited by TankenAbard

                      If the torp defense is mobile, and most of them have radar stealth, will they re-stealth once they are outside of vision range after some time? That alone could make them interesting, but depending on how fast they move, if they can fire while moving, etc, then why make subs? The range increase would destabilize naval balance for sure. Perhaps with all of the variables that exist in naval play, it shouldn't mimic the way land plays. Subs, amphibious, surface, hover and air can all play a part in the water. There are also no turrets that shoot at the surface that also float on the surface. I've seen mods that have things like that, it throws everything off. Shield towers don't exist on the water either.

                      Personally, I'd say increase their health, make them stick around for a while longer. No one wants to run up on a bunch of T2 torpedo turrets, shoot them at a distance because it's safe. What if it bought more time?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FtXCommandoF Offline
                        FtXCommando
                        last edited by

                        They’re literally already good

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Z Offline
                          zopniky
                          last edited by

                          I see them as really good situational options against UEF and Seraphim navies. It's especially important to note that for some time (as long as I can remember) folks have said that Sera navy is oppressive while any T2 TD will give you a reasonably powerful defensive option against T2 Sera navy if you sensibly combine them with TMD.

                          For a price of a half of a Destroyer you get about the same DPS, and a bit more HP.

                          Which is wild to think about because for the same price as one destroyer, you have a defensive option that can:

                          • fire on twice as many targets to deal with lower tech units (including subs!)
                          • have more HP than two equal tech naval units
                          • have the same DPS

                          They are easily outranged and destroyed by T2 ships.

                          For only Cybran and Aeon ships. At least for me, that's great faction diversity.
                          If you're against Cybran and/or Aeon navy then you can't rely on static defences to protect you from destroyers. Sure, every faction has cruisers but only UEF and Seraphim have cruisers that can similarly deal damage to torpedo launchers without being hit back - and those factions can't attack your T2 TD with destroyers without being immediately hit themselves.

                          T2 TD does one thing pretty well: make enemy navy lose momentum.

                          • Cybran and Aeon navy have to fight at full range
                            • If you're UEF, that's a good opportunity to micro shield boats to protect your T2 TD - spend your APM to preserve mass and make enemy mass decisions more taxing
                            • If you're UEF or Seraphim, you can threaten with cruisers
                            • If you're Cybran or Aeon you could be shooting back just the same
                          • Sera and UEF navy havy to rely on overwhelming TMD or fighting against T2 TD because they either attack into mass efficient weapons (that can't move, of course) or spend mass on cruisers which are, again, taxable due to the cost of TMD or the opportunity to make your own cruisers

                          I enjoy using T2 TD. I would like to know how making them movable or some other direct buff (range, damage, etc.) won't also make them that much more oppressive against UEF and Seraphim navy as a result. It's a situational tool that plays into understanding the unit mix of the factions you're playing with and against to make combat more complex.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • NoRest4TheWickedN Offline
                            NoRest4TheWicked
                            last edited by

                            Don't know if this helps but Cybran has t3 TLs and has 2 Experimentals with TLs 1 of which also has TD. Both the Amphibious tank and Brick have TLs. you have t1 and t2 subs with TLs Destroyers and BattleShips also have TLs Destroyers have TD and Walk on land. Cruisers Reflect Tac Missiles. Battleships have TMD Same with ACC. And Nuke subs have TLs. If you have an issue with Torpedoes or Navy Just play Cybran. Cybran is a terrifying force against Navy

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post