@blackheart said in Council of Setons EXPOSED - Part 1:
Ok, FtX is mean. Do you have any other points as well, or is this some last ditch attempt to bad PR him?
Wonder why he is mean?
Maybe because:
There is a guy running the show here who is perma-afk and who has failed to supply what he demands of FtX for the FAFlive channel, which FtX already supplied (financial overview and a sheet detailing where the FAF patreon money goes, for the past years). If you do the math, there should be a lot of money, and in best case it has been mismanaged, in worst case - draw your own conclusions.
There appears to be a conflict of interest on your end with the weird Sanctuary thing and the interests of FAF
There is in general complete apathy and 0 will from your end to move matters forward, its natural to get annoyed when your attempts to do something get locked by afk people who arent willing to do more than set up 1 meeting per 6 months
If you and your buddy big S wouldnt hide behind closed doors and also try to work on stuff more than 1 talk per half year FtX toxcity would disappear (yes yes, Ftx is impossible to work with, etc. - because he actually works).
I'm sure these are all valid complaints, but none of these issues excuse toxic behavior. Ftx has done a good job, but that doesn't mean he should be invulnerable to being called out on toxicity.
Normally hashing it out in private or with moderator involvement would be the most reasonable course of action, but this is a public office and it's important to come out with info about how the rest of the council feels about working with these individuals.