@Tagada We understand that - but the average viewer (especially new people) will not. This is how things get taken out of context. There ought to be different events that happened that are neither of those categories.
Group Details Private
Council of Setons
The FAF leadership team
You can't have different prizes for 5th,6th and 7th,8th places since they are all equal in a single-elimination bracket.
Yeah that is a fair point... i will address that.
IRC channel, Challonge, maps for Group stage added!
@Femboy I like it - great job.
To me it feels it should be slightly faster especially now that the logo doesn't get constructed during the animation. E.g., the logo is in view immediately and the animation feels a bit long. At 0:42 the logo is displaced twice because the same logo is used by the background banner. I feel that is a bit much - but I'm not sure what to do about that
I do not think such a system would work in practice as it takes too long to converge while at the same time the system is easy to manipulate. Even when that is not intended. As an example, if you often play 1v1 ladder and 4v4+ custom games then you gain CPU rating from ladder where as you can lose them from the custom games, evening out on 100 or whatever number is desired at that point in time.
Running a separate benchmark map that simulates the game is the best approach in my opinion. The benchmark map would run at full speed. We could for example take the real time (system time at end - system time at start) it took to run the benchmark as your score. We still need to dive into the details of this - nothing is set in stone.
I should've updated my post - due to a miss communication the balance patch and the developers patch would be released on the same day (the 26th). As this is a bad idea and due to LoTS we decided to go for the balance patch and move back the developers patch after LoTS. It is now set to the 20th - it does the same as the Nvidia fix mod does (once activated). You can use that until the 20th.